All Exams >
NDA >
General Knowledge for NDA >
All Questions
All questions of Central Government for NDA Exam
Which one of the following officials is not appointed by the President?- a)Judges of the Supreme Court
- b)Judges of the High Court
- c)District and Sessions Judges
- d)Attorney General of India
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following officials is not appointed by the President?
a)
Judges of the Supreme Court
b)
Judges of the High Court
c)
District and Sessions Judges
d)
Attorney General of India
|
Disha Chaudhary answered |
The district court is presided over by a district judge who is appointed by the state governor with on the advice of chief justice of that high court where as judges of high court and supreme court are appointed by the President
Who allocates portfolios among the ministers?- a)The Prime Minister
- b)The President at his discretion
- c)The President on the recommendation of the Prime Minister
- d)The Speaker by draw of lots
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Who allocates portfolios among the ministers?
a)
The Prime Minister
b)
The President at his discretion
c)
The President on the recommendation of the Prime Minister
d)
The Speaker by draw of lots
|
Aryan Khanna answered |
The Prime Minister is responsible for aiding and advising the President in the distribution of work of the Government to various ministries and offices and in terms of the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961. The coordinating work is generally allocated to the Cabinet Secretariat. While generally the work of the Government is divided into various Ministries, the Prime Minister may retain certain portfolios if they are not allocated to any member of the cabinet.
How many minimum number of times does the parliament have to meet in a year?- a)Once
- b)Twice
- c)Thrice
- d)There is no provision in this regard
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
How many minimum number of times does the parliament have to meet in a year?
a)
Once
b)
Twice
c)
Thrice
d)
There is no provision in this regard
|
Samaira nayar answered |
Minimum number of times Parliament has to meet in a year is thrice.
Constitutional Provisions:
Article 85 of the Indian Constitution mandates that the Parliament should meet at least twice a year, with a maximum gap of six months between two sessions.
However, the Parliament has been meeting thrice a year since 2000, as per the recommendations of the Standing Committee on Home Affairs.
The three sessions of Parliament are:
1. Budget Session: It is held from February to May, with a recess in between.
2. Monsoon Session: It is held from July to August.
3. Winter Session: It is held from November to December.
Importance of Parliament meetings:
1. Legislative work: Parliament meetings are essential for the passage of bills, discussion and debate on important issues, and the framing of laws.
2. Democratic accountability: Parliament meetings provide a platform for the elected representatives to question the government about its policies and decisions, and hold it accountable.
3. Representation: Parliament meetings provide an opportunity for the elected representatives to raise the issues and concerns of their constituents.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Parliament has to meet at least thrice a year as per the constitutional provisions. These meetings are crucial for the functioning of democracy and ensure that the government remains accountable to the people.
Constitutional Provisions:
Article 85 of the Indian Constitution mandates that the Parliament should meet at least twice a year, with a maximum gap of six months between two sessions.
However, the Parliament has been meeting thrice a year since 2000, as per the recommendations of the Standing Committee on Home Affairs.
The three sessions of Parliament are:
1. Budget Session: It is held from February to May, with a recess in between.
2. Monsoon Session: It is held from July to August.
3. Winter Session: It is held from November to December.
Importance of Parliament meetings:
1. Legislative work: Parliament meetings are essential for the passage of bills, discussion and debate on important issues, and the framing of laws.
2. Democratic accountability: Parliament meetings provide a platform for the elected representatives to question the government about its policies and decisions, and hold it accountable.
3. Representation: Parliament meetings provide an opportunity for the elected representatives to raise the issues and concerns of their constituents.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Parliament has to meet at least thrice a year as per the constitutional provisions. These meetings are crucial for the functioning of democracy and ensure that the government remains accountable to the people.
The Rajya Sabha is dissolved once in- a)2 years
- b)3 years
- c)6 years
- d)It is never dissolved
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
The Rajya Sabha is dissolved once in
a)
2 years
b)
3 years
c)
6 years
d)
It is never dissolved
|
|
Urvashi dubey answered |
The Rajya Sabha is the upper house of the Indian Parliament. It represents the states and union territories of India. Unlike the Lok Sabha, which is dissolved after completing its five-year term, the Rajya Sabha is a permanent house and is never dissolved.
Constitutional Provision:
Article 83(2) of the Constitution of India lays down the maximum term of the Lok Sabha to be five years from the date of its first meeting. However, Article 83(1) does not specify the term of the Rajya Sabha. It only mentions that the Rajya Sabha shall not be subject to dissolution.
Rajya Sabha Membership:
The Rajya Sabha consists of a maximum of 250 members. Twelve members are nominated by the President of India for their contributions to fields such as literature, art, and science. The remaining 238 members are elected by the legislative assemblies of the states and union territories. The members of the Rajya Sabha have a term of six years.
Vacancies in Rajya Sabha:
If a member of the Rajya Sabha resigns or dies during their term, their place is taken by another member who is elected or nominated to fill the vacancy. The term of the new member will be for the remaining period of the original member's term.
Conclusion:
To sum up, the Rajya Sabha is a permanent house of the Indian Parliament, and its members have a term of six years. It is never dissolved, and its functioning is not affected by the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. The Rajya Sabha plays a significant role in the Indian legislative process by providing a platform for the representation of states and union territories.
Constitutional Provision:
Article 83(2) of the Constitution of India lays down the maximum term of the Lok Sabha to be five years from the date of its first meeting. However, Article 83(1) does not specify the term of the Rajya Sabha. It only mentions that the Rajya Sabha shall not be subject to dissolution.
Rajya Sabha Membership:
The Rajya Sabha consists of a maximum of 250 members. Twelve members are nominated by the President of India for their contributions to fields such as literature, art, and science. The remaining 238 members are elected by the legislative assemblies of the states and union territories. The members of the Rajya Sabha have a term of six years.
Vacancies in Rajya Sabha:
If a member of the Rajya Sabha resigns or dies during their term, their place is taken by another member who is elected or nominated to fill the vacancy. The term of the new member will be for the remaining period of the original member's term.
Conclusion:
To sum up, the Rajya Sabha is a permanent house of the Indian Parliament, and its members have a term of six years. It is never dissolved, and its functioning is not affected by the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. The Rajya Sabha plays a significant role in the Indian legislative process by providing a platform for the representation of states and union territories.
Who is legally competent to declare war orconclude peace?- a)The President
- b)The Council of Ministers
- c)The Parliament
- d)The Prime Minister
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Who is legally competent to declare war orconclude peace?
a)
The President
b)
The Council of Ministers
c)
The Parliament
d)
The Prime Minister
|
Sakshi mehta answered |
The Legal Competency to Declare War or Conclude Peace
The power to declare war or make peace is a crucial aspect of the sovereignty of a nation. In most countries, this power is vested in the hands of a few individuals or institutions. In this regard, the President is legally competent to declare war or conclude peace. Here's why:
Constitutional Provisions
The Constitution of most countries provides for the division of powers between the various branches of government. In particular, it outlines the powers of the executive, legislative, and judiciary branches. The power to declare war or make peace falls under the executive branch. The President, as the head of the executive branch, is therefore legally competent to exercise this power.
Presidential Powers
The President has several powers that enable him to declare war or make peace. For instance, he is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. This means he has direct control over the military and can order them to engage in war or ceasefire. Additionally, the President has the power to negotiate treaties with other nations. This includes peace treaties that end an ongoing conflict.
Checks and Balances
While the President has the legal competency to declare war or make peace, this power is not absolute. Other institutions, such as the legislature, also have a role to play. For instance, Congress in the United States has the power to declare war. In other countries, the parliament may have to approve any treaty negotiated by the President before it becomes binding. This system of checks and balances ensures that no single branch of government has too much power.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the legal competency to declare war or make peace falls under the executive branch of government. The President, as the head of the executive, is therefore legally competent to exercise this power. However, other institutions, such as the legislature, also have a role to play in the decision-making process. Ultimately, the aim is to ensure that the power to declare war or make peace is exercised responsibly and with due consideration for the best interests of the nation.
The power to declare war or make peace is a crucial aspect of the sovereignty of a nation. In most countries, this power is vested in the hands of a few individuals or institutions. In this regard, the President is legally competent to declare war or conclude peace. Here's why:
Constitutional Provisions
The Constitution of most countries provides for the division of powers between the various branches of government. In particular, it outlines the powers of the executive, legislative, and judiciary branches. The power to declare war or make peace falls under the executive branch. The President, as the head of the executive branch, is therefore legally competent to exercise this power.
Presidential Powers
The President has several powers that enable him to declare war or make peace. For instance, he is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. This means he has direct control over the military and can order them to engage in war or ceasefire. Additionally, the President has the power to negotiate treaties with other nations. This includes peace treaties that end an ongoing conflict.
Checks and Balances
While the President has the legal competency to declare war or make peace, this power is not absolute. Other institutions, such as the legislature, also have a role to play. For instance, Congress in the United States has the power to declare war. In other countries, the parliament may have to approve any treaty negotiated by the President before it becomes binding. This system of checks and balances ensures that no single branch of government has too much power.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the legal competency to declare war or make peace falls under the executive branch of government. The President, as the head of the executive, is therefore legally competent to exercise this power. However, other institutions, such as the legislature, also have a role to play in the decision-making process. Ultimately, the aim is to ensure that the power to declare war or make peace is exercised responsibly and with due consideration for the best interests of the nation.
In which of the following legislatures can anon-member become the Presiding Officer?- a)Lok Sabha
- b)Rajya Sabha
- c)Vidhan Sabha
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
In which of the following legislatures can anon-member become the Presiding Officer?
a)
Lok Sabha
b)
Rajya Sabha
c)
Vidhan Sabha
d)
None of the above
|
Kriti malhotra answered |
Presiding Officer in Rajya Sabha
The Presiding Officer in any legislature refers to the person who is responsible for maintaining order and conducting the proceedings in the house. In India, the Presiding Officer is usually a member of the legislature who is elected to the position by the members of the house. However, in some cases, a non-member can also become the Presiding Officer.
In the case of the Rajya Sabha, a non-member can become the Presiding Officer. This is because the Presiding Officer of the Rajya Sabha is the Vice President of India, who is not required to be a member of the Rajya Sabha. The Vice President is elected by an Electoral College consisting of members of both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, as well as members of the Legislative Assemblies of the states.
The Vice President of India serves as the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, and is responsible for conducting the proceedings of the house, maintaining order, and interpreting the rules of the house. He or she also has the power to address the house and to adjourn or prorogue the session.
In summary, a non-member can become the Presiding Officer in the Rajya Sabha, as the position is held by the Vice President of India who is not required to be a member of the house.
The Presiding Officer in any legislature refers to the person who is responsible for maintaining order and conducting the proceedings in the house. In India, the Presiding Officer is usually a member of the legislature who is elected to the position by the members of the house. However, in some cases, a non-member can also become the Presiding Officer.
In the case of the Rajya Sabha, a non-member can become the Presiding Officer. This is because the Presiding Officer of the Rajya Sabha is the Vice President of India, who is not required to be a member of the Rajya Sabha. The Vice President is elected by an Electoral College consisting of members of both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, as well as members of the Legislative Assemblies of the states.
The Vice President of India serves as the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, and is responsible for conducting the proceedings of the house, maintaining order, and interpreting the rules of the house. He or she also has the power to address the house and to adjourn or prorogue the session.
In summary, a non-member can become the Presiding Officer in the Rajya Sabha, as the position is held by the Vice President of India who is not required to be a member of the house.
The executive power of the Indian Union is vested in the- a)President
- b)Parliament
- c)Prime Minister
- d)Council of Ministers
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The executive power of the Indian Union is vested in the
a)
President
b)
Parliament
c)
Prime Minister
d)
Council of Ministers
|
Meghana rane answered |
The Executive Power of the Indian Union
The Constitution of India provides for a Parliamentary form of government where the President is the head of the state and the Prime Minister is the head of the government. The executive power of the Indian Union is vested in the President, who exercises it either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with the Constitution.
Role and Powers of the President
The President of India is the ceremonial head of the state and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The President has the following powers and functions:
1. Executive Powers: The President is the head of the executive branch of the government and exercises executive powers in matters related to the appointment of the Prime Minister, Council of Ministers, Governors, Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, and other officials.
2. Legislative Powers: The President has the power to summon and prorogue sessions of Parliament, address both Houses of Parliament, and veto bills passed by Parliament.
3. Financial Powers: The President has the power to introduce Money Bills in Parliament, receive reports on the state of the economy, and appoint the Finance Commission.
4. Diplomatic Powers: The President represents India in international affairs and has the power to appoint ambassadors, receive foreign envoys, and sign treaties and agreements.
5. Emergency Powers: The President has the power to declare a state of emergency in case of internal or external threats to the security of the country.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the executive power of the Indian Union is vested in the President who exercises it directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with the Constitution. The President is the head of the executive branch of the government and has powers and functions related to executive, legislative, financial, diplomatic, and emergency matters.
The Constitution of India provides for a Parliamentary form of government where the President is the head of the state and the Prime Minister is the head of the government. The executive power of the Indian Union is vested in the President, who exercises it either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with the Constitution.
Role and Powers of the President
The President of India is the ceremonial head of the state and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The President has the following powers and functions:
1. Executive Powers: The President is the head of the executive branch of the government and exercises executive powers in matters related to the appointment of the Prime Minister, Council of Ministers, Governors, Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, and other officials.
2. Legislative Powers: The President has the power to summon and prorogue sessions of Parliament, address both Houses of Parliament, and veto bills passed by Parliament.
3. Financial Powers: The President has the power to introduce Money Bills in Parliament, receive reports on the state of the economy, and appoint the Finance Commission.
4. Diplomatic Powers: The President represents India in international affairs and has the power to appoint ambassadors, receive foreign envoys, and sign treaties and agreements.
5. Emergency Powers: The President has the power to declare a state of emergency in case of internal or external threats to the security of the country.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the executive power of the Indian Union is vested in the President who exercises it directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with the Constitution. The President is the head of the executive branch of the government and has powers and functions related to executive, legislative, financial, diplomatic, and emergency matters.
Which of the following states have equal representation in Lok Sabha?
- a)Assam, Jharkhand
- b)Bihar, Tamil Nadu
- c)Kerala, Odisha
- d)Haryana, Punjab
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following states have equal representation in Lok Sabha?
a)
Assam, Jharkhand
b)
Bihar, Tamil Nadu
c)
Kerala, Odisha
d)
Haryana, Punjab
|
Avantika Chakraborty answered |
- The maximum strength of the Lok Sabha House is 552 members - 530 members to represent the States, 20 members to represent the Union Territories, and 2 members to be nominated by the President from the Anglo-Indian Community.
- The Lok Sabha at present consists of 545 members i.e. 530 members are directly elected from the States and 13 from Union Territories, while the President of Indian nominates two members to represent the Anglo Indian Community.
- Uttar Pradesh has the highest number of Lok Sabha seats i.e. 80.
- Maharashtra has 48 Lok Sabha seats.
- Bihar has 40 Lok Sabha seats.
- Tamil Nadu has 39 Lok Sabha seats.
- Haryana has 10, whereas Punjab has 13.
- Kerala has 20, where as Odisha as 21.
- Assam and Jharkhand both have 14 each.
- Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan have 25 Lok Sabha seats each.
The President appoints all of the following but- a)Attorney General
- b)Chief Election Commissioner
- c)Advocate General
- d)Chief Justice of India
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The President appoints all of the following but
a)
Attorney General
b)
Chief Election Commissioner
c)
Advocate General
d)
Chief Justice of India
|
Urvashi nayar answered |
The President appoints all of the following but the Advocate General.
The Advocate General is not appointed by the President but by the Governor of the state. The Advocate General is the highest law officer of the state government and acts as its legal advisor. Let's understand why the President does not appoint the Advocate General by looking at the roles and responsibilities of each position.
1. Attorney General:
The Attorney General is the highest law officer of the country and is appointed by the President. The Attorney General represents the Government of India in legal matters and provides legal advice to the President and other government officials. The Attorney General also has the power to appear in any court of law in the country.
2. Chief Election Commissioner:
The Chief Election Commissioner is also appointed by the President. The Chief Election Commissioner is responsible for the conduct of elections in the country. This includes overseeing the preparation of electoral rolls, conducting free and fair elections, and enforcing the Model Code of Conduct during elections.
3. Chief Justice of India:
The Chief Justice of India is the highest-ranking judge in the country and is appointed by the President. The Chief Justice of India heads the Supreme Court and is responsible for the administration of justice in the country. The Chief Justice of India plays a crucial role in the appointment of judges to various courts, including the Supreme Court and High Courts.
4. Advocate General:
The Advocate General is appointed by the Governor of the state. The Advocate General represents the state government in legal matters and provides legal advice to the Governor and other state government officials. The Advocate General also represents the state government in court cases and defends its interests.
In conclusion, while the President appoints the Attorney General, Chief Election Commissioner, and Chief Justice of India, the Advocate General is appointed by the Governor of the state. This distinction is important to maintain the separation of powers between the central government and the state government.
The Advocate General is not appointed by the President but by the Governor of the state. The Advocate General is the highest law officer of the state government and acts as its legal advisor. Let's understand why the President does not appoint the Advocate General by looking at the roles and responsibilities of each position.
1. Attorney General:
The Attorney General is the highest law officer of the country and is appointed by the President. The Attorney General represents the Government of India in legal matters and provides legal advice to the President and other government officials. The Attorney General also has the power to appear in any court of law in the country.
2. Chief Election Commissioner:
The Chief Election Commissioner is also appointed by the President. The Chief Election Commissioner is responsible for the conduct of elections in the country. This includes overseeing the preparation of electoral rolls, conducting free and fair elections, and enforcing the Model Code of Conduct during elections.
3. Chief Justice of India:
The Chief Justice of India is the highest-ranking judge in the country and is appointed by the President. The Chief Justice of India heads the Supreme Court and is responsible for the administration of justice in the country. The Chief Justice of India plays a crucial role in the appointment of judges to various courts, including the Supreme Court and High Courts.
4. Advocate General:
The Advocate General is appointed by the Governor of the state. The Advocate General represents the state government in legal matters and provides legal advice to the Governor and other state government officials. The Advocate General also represents the state government in court cases and defends its interests.
In conclusion, while the President appoints the Attorney General, Chief Election Commissioner, and Chief Justice of India, the Advocate General is appointed by the Governor of the state. This distinction is important to maintain the separation of powers between the central government and the state government.
The President of India is elected by- a)Proportional representation by a list system
- b)Proportional representation by a single transferable vote.
- c)List system
- d)Single member territorial representation
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The President of India is elected by
a)
Proportional representation by a list system
b)
Proportional representation by a single transferable vote.
c)
List system
d)
Single member territorial representation
|
Nilesh Banerjee answered |
Election of President of India by Proportional representation by a single transferable vote
The President of India is the head of state of India and is elected by an Electoral College consisting of elected members of both the Houses of Parliament and of the Legislative Assemblies of States.
The election of the President of India is done through the system of Proportional representation by a single transferable vote.
Explanation:
Proportional representation by a single transferable vote is a system where voters rank candidates in order of preference, and candidates are elected based on the proportion of votes they receive. This system ensures that every vote counts and that candidates are elected based on the will of the people.
In the case of the Presidential election in India, the Electoral College comprises of elected members of both the Houses of Parliament and of the Legislative Assemblies of States. The value of the vote of each member of the Electoral College is determined by the population of the state they represent.
Under the system of Proportional representation by a single transferable vote, each member of the Electoral College casts their vote by ranking the candidates in order of preference. The candidate who receives a majority of the votes is declared the winner.
If no candidate receives a majority of votes, then the candidate with the least number of votes is eliminated, and their votes are transferred to the other candidates based on the preferences indicated by the voters. This process continues until a candidate receives a majority of the votes.
Conclusion:
Thus, the election of the President of India through the system of Proportional representation by a single transferable vote ensures that the President is elected based on the will of the people and that every vote counts.
The President of India is the head of state of India and is elected by an Electoral College consisting of elected members of both the Houses of Parliament and of the Legislative Assemblies of States.
The election of the President of India is done through the system of Proportional representation by a single transferable vote.
Explanation:
Proportional representation by a single transferable vote is a system where voters rank candidates in order of preference, and candidates are elected based on the proportion of votes they receive. This system ensures that every vote counts and that candidates are elected based on the will of the people.
In the case of the Presidential election in India, the Electoral College comprises of elected members of both the Houses of Parliament and of the Legislative Assemblies of States. The value of the vote of each member of the Electoral College is determined by the population of the state they represent.
Under the system of Proportional representation by a single transferable vote, each member of the Electoral College casts their vote by ranking the candidates in order of preference. The candidate who receives a majority of the votes is declared the winner.
If no candidate receives a majority of votes, then the candidate with the least number of votes is eliminated, and their votes are transferred to the other candidates based on the preferences indicated by the voters. This process continues until a candidate receives a majority of the votes.
Conclusion:
Thus, the election of the President of India through the system of Proportional representation by a single transferable vote ensures that the President is elected based on the will of the people and that every vote counts.
The members of Rajya Sabha are- a)Elected by the members of Lok Sabha
- b)Elected by elected members of State Legislative Assemblies
- c)Nominated by President and State Governors
- d)Elected by the voters of India
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The members of Rajya Sabha are
a)
Elected by the members of Lok Sabha
b)
Elected by elected members of State Legislative Assemblies
c)
Nominated by President and State Governors
d)
Elected by the voters of India
|
|
Anaya Patel answered |
The correct option is B.
A Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha (abbreviated: MP) is the representative of the Indian states to the one of the two houses of the Parliament of India (Rajya Sabha). Rajya Sabha MPs are elected by the electoral college of the elected members of the State Assembly with a system of proportional representation by a single transferable vote.
A Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha (abbreviated: MP) is the representative of the Indian states to the one of the two houses of the Parliament of India (Rajya Sabha). Rajya Sabha MPs are elected by the electoral college of the elected members of the State Assembly with a system of proportional representation by a single transferable vote.
In the event of vacancies in the offices of both the President and the Vice-President, who shall discharge the functions of the President till a new one is elected?- a)Speaker of the Lok Sabha
- b)Leader of the majority party in the Lok Sabha
- c)Chief Justice of India
- d)Senior-most Governor
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
In the event of vacancies in the offices of both the President and the Vice-President, who shall discharge the functions of the President till a new one is elected?
a)
Speaker of the Lok Sabha
b)
Leader of the majority party in the Lok Sabha
c)
Chief Justice of India
d)
Senior-most Governor
|
Harshita Nikumbh answered |
C)Chief Justice of India
The veto power of the President covers- a)Money Bills
- b)Non-Money Bills
- c)Constitutional Amendment Bills
- d)All Bills other than Money Bills and Constitutional Amendment Bills
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
The veto power of the President covers
a)
Money Bills
b)
Non-Money Bills
c)
Constitutional Amendment Bills
d)
All Bills other than Money Bills and Constitutional Amendment Bills
|
Arnav Saini answered |
The veto power of the President covers all Bills other than Money Bills and Constitutional Amendment Bills. This means that the President has the power to refuse to sign a Bill passed by the Parliament, thereby preventing it from becoming a law.
Explanation:
The Indian Constitution provides for three types of veto powers for the President of India. These are:
1. Absolute veto: This power allows the President to refuse to assent to a Bill passed by the Parliament. If the President exercises this power, the Bill is considered to be rejected outright and cannot be reintroduced in the Parliament.
2. Suspensive veto: This power allows the President to withhold his assent to a Bill passed by the Parliament, but only for a limited period of time. If the President does not give his assent within this period, the Bill is considered to be rejected.
3. Pocket veto: This power allows the President to withhold his assent to a Bill passed by the Parliament and not return it for reconsideration. If the President exercises this power, the Bill lapses and cannot be reintroduced in the Parliament.
However, these veto powers are not applicable to all types of Bills. The President does not have the power to veto Money Bills and Constitutional Amendment Bills.
Money Bills:
Money Bills are Bills that relate to financial matters, such as taxation, borrowing, expenditure, etc. These Bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha and cannot be amended or rejected by the Rajya Sabha. Once a Money Bill is passed by the Lok Sabha, it is deemed to have been passed by both Houses of Parliament. The President can only give his assent or withhold it, but cannot return a Money Bill for reconsideration.
Constitutional Amendment Bills:
Constitutional Amendment Bills are Bills that seek to amend the provisions of the Indian Constitution. These Bills require a special majority in both Houses of Parliament, i.e., two-thirds of the members present and voting, and a majority of the total membership of each House. Once a Constitutional Amendment Bill is passed by both Houses of Parliament, it is sent to the President for his assent. The President does not have the power to veto such Bills, but he can send them back for reconsideration if he has any doubts about their constitutionality.
Therefore, the President's veto power covers all Bills other than Money Bills and Constitutional Amendment Bills. This means that the President can refuse to sign any other type of Bill passed by the Parliament, thereby preventing it from becoming a law. However, this power is subject to certain limitations and safeguards, such as the need for the President to act on the advice of the Council of Ministers, the requirement to give reasons for withholding assent, and the possibility of the Parliament overriding the President's veto by a two-thirds majority in both Houses.
Explanation:
The Indian Constitution provides for three types of veto powers for the President of India. These are:
1. Absolute veto: This power allows the President to refuse to assent to a Bill passed by the Parliament. If the President exercises this power, the Bill is considered to be rejected outright and cannot be reintroduced in the Parliament.
2. Suspensive veto: This power allows the President to withhold his assent to a Bill passed by the Parliament, but only for a limited period of time. If the President does not give his assent within this period, the Bill is considered to be rejected.
3. Pocket veto: This power allows the President to withhold his assent to a Bill passed by the Parliament and not return it for reconsideration. If the President exercises this power, the Bill lapses and cannot be reintroduced in the Parliament.
However, these veto powers are not applicable to all types of Bills. The President does not have the power to veto Money Bills and Constitutional Amendment Bills.
Money Bills:
Money Bills are Bills that relate to financial matters, such as taxation, borrowing, expenditure, etc. These Bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha and cannot be amended or rejected by the Rajya Sabha. Once a Money Bill is passed by the Lok Sabha, it is deemed to have been passed by both Houses of Parliament. The President can only give his assent or withhold it, but cannot return a Money Bill for reconsideration.
Constitutional Amendment Bills:
Constitutional Amendment Bills are Bills that seek to amend the provisions of the Indian Constitution. These Bills require a special majority in both Houses of Parliament, i.e., two-thirds of the members present and voting, and a majority of the total membership of each House. Once a Constitutional Amendment Bill is passed by both Houses of Parliament, it is sent to the President for his assent. The President does not have the power to veto such Bills, but he can send them back for reconsideration if he has any doubts about their constitutionality.
Therefore, the President's veto power covers all Bills other than Money Bills and Constitutional Amendment Bills. This means that the President can refuse to sign any other type of Bill passed by the Parliament, thereby preventing it from becoming a law. However, this power is subject to certain limitations and safeguards, such as the need for the President to act on the advice of the Council of Ministers, the requirement to give reasons for withholding assent, and the possibility of the Parliament overriding the President's veto by a two-thirds majority in both Houses.
Generally, the Prime Minister is- a)not a member of Parliament
- b)a member of Lok Sabha
- c)a member of Rajya Sabha
- d)a member of the Lok Sabha as well as Rajya Sabha
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Generally, the Prime Minister is
a)
not a member of Parliament
b)
a member of Lok Sabha
c)
a member of Rajya Sabha
d)
a member of the Lok Sabha as well as Rajya Sabha
|
|
Dhruba Mehta answered |
The Prime Minister is a Member of Parliament and is responsible for leading the government and making major decisions. However, the Prime Minister does not have to be a member of the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha specifically.
Member of Parliament
The Prime Minister is a member of Parliament, which means they are elected to represent a certain constituency in either the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha. This allows them to participate in parliamentary debates and vote on legislation.
Leader of the Government
As the head of the government, the Prime Minister is responsible for making major decisions and leading the country. They work closely with other government officials to develop and implement policies that benefit the country.
No Specific Chamber Requirement
While the Prime Minister is a Member of Parliament, they do not have to be a member of a specific chamber. They can be a member of the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha, depending on their election. However, they do need to have the support of a majority of members in the Lok Sabha in order to form a government.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Prime Minister is a member of Parliament, but not necessarily a member of the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha specifically. They are responsible for leading the government and making major decisions, and work closely with other government officials to develop and implement policies.
Member of Parliament
The Prime Minister is a member of Parliament, which means they are elected to represent a certain constituency in either the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha. This allows them to participate in parliamentary debates and vote on legislation.
Leader of the Government
As the head of the government, the Prime Minister is responsible for making major decisions and leading the country. They work closely with other government officials to develop and implement policies that benefit the country.
No Specific Chamber Requirement
While the Prime Minister is a Member of Parliament, they do not have to be a member of a specific chamber. They can be a member of the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha, depending on their election. However, they do need to have the support of a majority of members in the Lok Sabha in order to form a government.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Prime Minister is a member of Parliament, but not necessarily a member of the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha specifically. They are responsible for leading the government and making major decisions, and work closely with other government officials to develop and implement policies.
The quorum of the Lok Sabha is fixed at- a)One-tenth of the total membership of the House.
- b)One-fourth of the total membership of the House.
- c)One-third of the total membership of the House.
- d)One-seventh of the total membership of the House.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The quorum of the Lok Sabha is fixed at
a)
One-tenth of the total membership of the House.
b)
One-fourth of the total membership of the House.
c)
One-third of the total membership of the House.
d)
One-seventh of the total membership of the House.
|
Kailash prakash answered |
Quorum of Lok Sabha
The quorum of the Lok Sabha is the minimum number of members required to be present in the House to transact business. The quorum is fixed by the Constitution of India under Article 100(3) and it is determined based on the total membership of the House.
Fixed Quorum
The fixed quorum of the Lok Sabha is one-tenth of the total membership of the House. Currently, the Lok Sabha has a total strength of 545 members, which means the quorum of the House is 55 members.
Importance of Quorum
The quorum is important to ensure that the House has enough members present to make decisions on important matters. If the quorum is not met, the House cannot transact any business, and the proceedings are adjourned.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the quorum of the Lok Sabha is fixed at one-tenth of the total membership of the House. It is important to ensure that the House has enough members present to make decisions on important matters.
The quorum of the Lok Sabha is the minimum number of members required to be present in the House to transact business. The quorum is fixed by the Constitution of India under Article 100(3) and it is determined based on the total membership of the House.
Fixed Quorum
The fixed quorum of the Lok Sabha is one-tenth of the total membership of the House. Currently, the Lok Sabha has a total strength of 545 members, which means the quorum of the House is 55 members.
Importance of Quorum
The quorum is important to ensure that the House has enough members present to make decisions on important matters. If the quorum is not met, the House cannot transact any business, and the proceedings are adjourned.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the quorum of the Lok Sabha is fixed at one-tenth of the total membership of the House. It is important to ensure that the House has enough members present to make decisions on important matters.
In which case is the President NOT bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers?- a)In deciding the removal of a Governor
- b)In deciding the question whether a member of Lok Sabha has become disqualified
- c)While exercising power to grant pardon
- d)In dismissing a civil servant without any enquiryand hearing on the ground of security of the State
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
In which case is the President NOT bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers?
a)
In deciding the removal of a Governor
b)
In deciding the question whether a member of Lok Sabha has become disqualified
c)
While exercising power to grant pardon
d)
In dismissing a civil servant without any enquiryand hearing on the ground of security of the State
|
Jhalak Bhargav answered |
If one goes through the 42nd and 44th amendment they will get to know that the president may consider the aid and advise of the council of ministers and act in accordance of it...but not necessarily ...he might not consider the advise and act according to his or her will
Who was the elected President of India unanimously?- a)Dr. S. Radha Krishnan
- b)V.V. Giri
- c)N. Sanjiva Reddy
- d)Gyani Zail Singh
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Who was the elected President of India unanimously?
a)
Dr. S. Radha Krishnan
b)
V.V. Giri
c)
N. Sanjiva Reddy
d)
Gyani Zail Singh
|
Shahid answered |
Because in the 7th Presidential election of India on 1977.
Even though 37 candidates filed their nominations, 36 of them were *rejected*, leading to Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy being the only President of India winning unopposed.
I hope this will help.❤
Who amongst the following CANNOT vote in the election of the President?- a)Speaker of the Lok Sabha
- b)Speaker of the Vidhan Sabha
- c)Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha
- d)Members nominated by the President in the Council of States
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Who amongst the following CANNOT vote in the election of the President?
a)
Speaker of the Lok Sabha
b)
Speaker of the Vidhan Sabha
c)
Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha
d)
Members nominated by the President in the Council of States
|
Akanksha kumar answered |
Explanation:
The election of the President of India is conducted through an Electoral College consisting of elected members of both Houses of Parliament and elected members of the Legislative Assemblies of States and Union Territories. However, there are certain officials who are not allowed to vote in the Presidential election, and they include:
1. Speaker of the Lok Sabha:
The Speaker of the Lok Sabha is the presiding officer of the lower house of Parliament. The Speaker is an elected member of the House and is expected to maintain impartiality and fairness in conducting the business of the House. However, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha is allowed to vote in the Presidential election, as he/she is an elected member of the House.
2. Speaker of the Vidhan Sabha:
The Speaker of the Vidhan Sabha is the presiding officer of the legislative assembly of a state. Similar to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, the Speaker of the Vidhan Sabha is an elected member of the House and is expected to maintain impartiality and fairness in conducting the business of the House. However, the Speaker of the Vidhan Sabha is allowed to vote in the Presidential election, as he/she is an elected member of the House.
3. Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha:
The Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha is the second-highest-ranking official of the lower house of Parliament. The Deputy Speaker is elected by the members of the House and is expected to assist the Speaker in conducting the business of the House. However, the Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha is allowed to vote in the Presidential election, as he/she is an elected member of the House.
4. Members nominated by the President in the Council of States:
The Council of States, also known as the Rajya Sabha, is the upper house of Parliament. The members of the Rajya Sabha are elected by the Legislative Assemblies of States and Union Territories. However, the President of India can nominate 12 members to the Rajya Sabha, who are experts in various fields such as science, art, literature, and social service. These nominated members are not allowed to vote in the Presidential election, as they are not elected members of the House.
Therefore, option D is the correct answer as members nominated by the President in the Council of States are not allowed to vote in the election of the President.
The election of the President of India is conducted through an Electoral College consisting of elected members of both Houses of Parliament and elected members of the Legislative Assemblies of States and Union Territories. However, there are certain officials who are not allowed to vote in the Presidential election, and they include:
1. Speaker of the Lok Sabha:
The Speaker of the Lok Sabha is the presiding officer of the lower house of Parliament. The Speaker is an elected member of the House and is expected to maintain impartiality and fairness in conducting the business of the House. However, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha is allowed to vote in the Presidential election, as he/she is an elected member of the House.
2. Speaker of the Vidhan Sabha:
The Speaker of the Vidhan Sabha is the presiding officer of the legislative assembly of a state. Similar to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, the Speaker of the Vidhan Sabha is an elected member of the House and is expected to maintain impartiality and fairness in conducting the business of the House. However, the Speaker of the Vidhan Sabha is allowed to vote in the Presidential election, as he/she is an elected member of the House.
3. Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha:
The Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha is the second-highest-ranking official of the lower house of Parliament. The Deputy Speaker is elected by the members of the House and is expected to assist the Speaker in conducting the business of the House. However, the Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha is allowed to vote in the Presidential election, as he/she is an elected member of the House.
4. Members nominated by the President in the Council of States:
The Council of States, also known as the Rajya Sabha, is the upper house of Parliament. The members of the Rajya Sabha are elected by the Legislative Assemblies of States and Union Territories. However, the President of India can nominate 12 members to the Rajya Sabha, who are experts in various fields such as science, art, literature, and social service. These nominated members are not allowed to vote in the Presidential election, as they are not elected members of the House.
Therefore, option D is the correct answer as members nominated by the President in the Council of States are not allowed to vote in the election of the President.
An Indian can contest election for a Legislative Assembly from- a)Any State
- b)Only the State in which he is a voter
- c)All states except Jammu and Kashmir
- d)All states even if he is not a voter in that State
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
An Indian can contest election for a Legislative Assembly from
a)
Any State
b)
Only the State in which he is a voter
c)
All states except Jammu and Kashmir
d)
All states even if he is not a voter in that State
|
Rounak Menon answered |
Explanation:
Introduction:
The Indian Constitution has made provisions for the election of members of the Legislative Assembly of each State. The Elections are held in accordance with the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Any Indian citizen who satisfies the qualification criteria can contest elections for the Legislative Assembly.
Qualifications to contest elections:
The Constitution of India has set the following qualifications for becoming a member of the Legislative Assembly:
1. The candidate must be a citizen of India.
2. The candidate must have attained the age of 25 years.
3. The candidate must be a voter in any constituency of the State for which he/she is contesting the election.
Answer:
The correct option is (b) Only the State in which he is a voter. It means that an Indian citizen can contest elections for the Legislative Assembly of only that State in which he/she is a registered voter. The Constitution of India has made it mandatory for a candidate to be a voter in the constituency for which he/she is contesting the election.
Reasoning:
The reason behind this criterion is to ensure that the candidate has a direct interest in the affairs of the constituency and has an understanding of the local issues and problems faced by the people. It also ensures that the candidate has some support in the constituency and is not an outsider who has no connection with the local people.
Exceptions:
There are no exceptions to this rule. However, there are provisions for a candidate to contest elections from more than one constituency, but he/she must fulfill the criteria of being a voter in each constituency.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, an Indian citizen can contest elections for the Legislative Assembly of only that State in which he/she is a registered voter. The Constitution of India has made it mandatory for a candidate to be a voter in the constituency for which he/she is contesting the election. This criterion ensures that the candidate has a direct interest in the affairs of the constituency and has an understanding of the local issues and problems faced by the people.
Introduction:
The Indian Constitution has made provisions for the election of members of the Legislative Assembly of each State. The Elections are held in accordance with the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Any Indian citizen who satisfies the qualification criteria can contest elections for the Legislative Assembly.
Qualifications to contest elections:
The Constitution of India has set the following qualifications for becoming a member of the Legislative Assembly:
1. The candidate must be a citizen of India.
2. The candidate must have attained the age of 25 years.
3. The candidate must be a voter in any constituency of the State for which he/she is contesting the election.
Answer:
The correct option is (b) Only the State in which he is a voter. It means that an Indian citizen can contest elections for the Legislative Assembly of only that State in which he/she is a registered voter. The Constitution of India has made it mandatory for a candidate to be a voter in the constituency for which he/she is contesting the election.
Reasoning:
The reason behind this criterion is to ensure that the candidate has a direct interest in the affairs of the constituency and has an understanding of the local issues and problems faced by the people. It also ensures that the candidate has some support in the constituency and is not an outsider who has no connection with the local people.
Exceptions:
There are no exceptions to this rule. However, there are provisions for a candidate to contest elections from more than one constituency, but he/she must fulfill the criteria of being a voter in each constituency.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, an Indian citizen can contest elections for the Legislative Assembly of only that State in which he/she is a registered voter. The Constitution of India has made it mandatory for a candidate to be a voter in the constituency for which he/she is contesting the election. This criterion ensures that the candidate has a direct interest in the affairs of the constituency and has an understanding of the local issues and problems faced by the people.
Which power is exclusive to the Rajya Sabha?- a)To initiate impeachment proceedings against the President
- b)To recommend the creation of new All India Services
- c)To remove the Vice-President
- d)All these powers
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which power is exclusive to the Rajya Sabha?
a)
To initiate impeachment proceedings against the President
b)
To recommend the creation of new All India Services
c)
To remove the Vice-President
d)
All these powers
|
Vikram answered |
Option C is also correct
The Lok Sabha has more powers vis a vis Rajya Sabha- a)In all matters
- b)In money matters only
- c)during amendment to the Constitution
- d)during the removal of the President
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The Lok Sabha has more powers vis a vis Rajya Sabha
a)
In all matters
b)
In money matters only
c)
during amendment to the Constitution
d)
during the removal of the President
|
|
Sharada verma answered |
The Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha are the two Houses of the Indian Parliament. While both Houses have significant powers, there are certain areas where one House has more powers than the other.
The correct answer to the question is option B, which states that the Lok Sabha has more powers than the Rajya Sabha in money matters only. This is because the Lok Sabha has more control over the finances of the country, as all money bills must originate in the Lok Sabha.
Explanation:
Money Bills:
- A money bill is a bill that only contains provisions related to taxation, borrowing of money by the government, expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India, or the imposition of fees or fines.
- The Constitution of India gives the Lok Sabha more powers than the Rajya Sabha when it comes to dealing with money bills.
- Money bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha, and once they are passed by the Lok Sabha, they are sent to the Rajya Sabha for its recommendations.
- The Rajya Sabha can either pass the bill, reject it or suggest changes to it. However, the Lok Sabha is not bound by the recommendations of the Rajya Sabha, and can either accept or reject them.
- If the Lok Sabha rejects the recommendations of the Rajya Sabha, the bill will be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the Lok Sabha.
Other Powers:
- While the Lok Sabha has more powers than the Rajya Sabha in money matters, both Houses have equal powers in most other matters.
- For example, both Houses have the power to initiate and pass bills, and to scrutinize the actions of the executive branch of the government.
- However, there are certain areas where one House has more powers than the other. For example, the Rajya Sabha has more powers than the Lok Sabha when it comes to impeaching the President of India.
- The Lok Sabha has more powers than the Rajya Sabha when it comes to amending the Constitution, as a constitutional amendment bill must be passed by both Houses with a two-thirds majority, but the Lok Sabha has more members than the Rajya Sabha.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, while both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha have significant powers, the Lok Sabha has more powers than the Rajya Sabha in money matters only. This is because the Lok Sabha has more control over the finances of the country, as all money bills must originate in the Lok Sabha.
The correct answer to the question is option B, which states that the Lok Sabha has more powers than the Rajya Sabha in money matters only. This is because the Lok Sabha has more control over the finances of the country, as all money bills must originate in the Lok Sabha.
Explanation:
Money Bills:
- A money bill is a bill that only contains provisions related to taxation, borrowing of money by the government, expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India, or the imposition of fees or fines.
- The Constitution of India gives the Lok Sabha more powers than the Rajya Sabha when it comes to dealing with money bills.
- Money bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha, and once they are passed by the Lok Sabha, they are sent to the Rajya Sabha for its recommendations.
- The Rajya Sabha can either pass the bill, reject it or suggest changes to it. However, the Lok Sabha is not bound by the recommendations of the Rajya Sabha, and can either accept or reject them.
- If the Lok Sabha rejects the recommendations of the Rajya Sabha, the bill will be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the Lok Sabha.
Other Powers:
- While the Lok Sabha has more powers than the Rajya Sabha in money matters, both Houses have equal powers in most other matters.
- For example, both Houses have the power to initiate and pass bills, and to scrutinize the actions of the executive branch of the government.
- However, there are certain areas where one House has more powers than the other. For example, the Rajya Sabha has more powers than the Lok Sabha when it comes to impeaching the President of India.
- The Lok Sabha has more powers than the Rajya Sabha when it comes to amending the Constitution, as a constitutional amendment bill must be passed by both Houses with a two-thirds majority, but the Lok Sabha has more members than the Rajya Sabha.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, while both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha have significant powers, the Lok Sabha has more powers than the Rajya Sabha in money matters only. This is because the Lok Sabha has more control over the finances of the country, as all money bills must originate in the Lok Sabha.
The Vice-President can be removed before his term by- a)the President at this discretion
- b)the two Houses of Parliament
- c)the Rajya Sabha with two-thirds majority
- d)the President with the consent of the majority ofthe State Legislatures
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The Vice-President can be removed before his term by
a)
the President at this discretion
b)
the two Houses of Parliament
c)
the Rajya Sabha with two-thirds majority
d)
the President with the consent of the majority ofthe State Legislatures
|
Nishant Upadhyay answered |
According to Article 67 (b) a Vice-President may be removed from his office by a resolution of the Council of Statespassed by a majority of all the then members of the Council and agreed to by the House of the People;but no resolution for the purpose of this clause shall be moved unless at least fourteen days' notice hasbeen given of the intention to move the resolution;
Which one of the following Bills is not introduced in Rajya Sabha?- a)Amendment Bill
- b)Ordinary Bill
- c)Money Bill
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following Bills is not introduced in Rajya Sabha?
a)
Amendment Bill
b)
Ordinary Bill
c)
Money Bill
d)
None of the above
|
|
Radhika joshi answered |
The correct answer is C as money bills are always passed in lok sabha.
Which one is regarded as the most active committee of the Cabinet?- a)Committee on economic affairs
- b)Committee on appointments
- c)Committee on foreign affairs
- d)Committee on political affairs
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one is regarded as the most active committee of the Cabinet?
a)
Committee on economic affairs
b)
Committee on appointments
c)
Committee on foreign affairs
d)
Committee on political affairs
|
Sagnik Patel answered |
The Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs is regarded as the most active committee of the Cabinet.
Explanation:
The Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs (CCPA) is a committee of the Cabinet of India, responsible for dealing with all political issues and matters relating to political management. It is considered the most active committee of the Cabinet due to its role in making important decisions related to political affairs.
Functions and Responsibilities of CCPA:
1. Political Management: The CCPA deals with all political issues and matters relating to political management.
2. Coordination between different Ministries: It ensures coordination between different Ministries and departments of the Government.
3. Cabinet meetings: It recommends the agenda for Cabinet meetings and ensures that all decisions of the Cabinet are implemented.
4. National Security: CCPA also deals with matters related to national security, internal security, and foreign policy.
5. Emergency Measures: It recommends emergency measures to be taken during natural calamities, national emergencies, and other crises.
Conclusion:
The Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs plays a crucial role in the functioning of the Indian government, and its decisions have a major impact on the country's political and governance landscape. Therefore, it is regarded as the most active committee of the Cabinet.
Explanation:
The Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs (CCPA) is a committee of the Cabinet of India, responsible for dealing with all political issues and matters relating to political management. It is considered the most active committee of the Cabinet due to its role in making important decisions related to political affairs.
Functions and Responsibilities of CCPA:
1. Political Management: The CCPA deals with all political issues and matters relating to political management.
2. Coordination between different Ministries: It ensures coordination between different Ministries and departments of the Government.
3. Cabinet meetings: It recommends the agenda for Cabinet meetings and ensures that all decisions of the Cabinet are implemented.
4. National Security: CCPA also deals with matters related to national security, internal security, and foreign policy.
5. Emergency Measures: It recommends emergency measures to be taken during natural calamities, national emergencies, and other crises.
Conclusion:
The Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs plays a crucial role in the functioning of the Indian government, and its decisions have a major impact on the country's political and governance landscape. Therefore, it is regarded as the most active committee of the Cabinet.
Who among the following DOES NOT hold office at the pleasure of the President?- a)Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission
- b)Attorney General of India
- c)Speaker of the Lok Sabha
- d)Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Who among the following DOES NOT hold office at the pleasure of the President?
a)
Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission
b)
Attorney General of India
c)
Speaker of the Lok Sabha
d)
Comptroller and Auditor General of India
|
Aishwarya nayar answered |
CAG is appointed by the President of India on advice of Union Cabinet under Article 76(1) of the Constitution and holds office during the pleasure of the President.
A candidate to become a member of LokSabha should not be below- a)21 years
- b)25 years
- c)30 years
- d)35 years
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
A candidate to become a member of LokSabha should not be below
a)
21 years
b)
25 years
c)
30 years
d)
35 years
|
|
Nisha verma answered |
Qualifications for Membership of Lok Sabha
To become a member of Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian Parliament, certain qualifications need to be fulfilled. One of these qualifications is the minimum age requirement. According to the Indian Constitution, a candidate aspiring to become a member of Lok Sabha should not be below 25 years of age. Let's understand the rationale behind this requirement.
Constitutional Provisions
The qualifications for membership of Lok Sabha are mentioned in Article 84 of the Indian Constitution. This article lays down the following conditions for eligibility:
1. Citizenship: The candidate must be a citizen of India.
2. Age: The candidate should not be less than 25 years of age.
3. Electoral Roll: The candidate must be registered as an elector for any parliamentary constituency.
4. Disqualifications: The candidate should not be disqualified under any law made by Parliament.
Reasoning behind the Age Requirement
The minimum age requirement of 25 years for Lok Sabha membership serves several purposes:
1. Maturity and Experience: By setting a minimum age, the Constitution ensures that the candidates have attained a certain level of maturity and experience. This ensures that the members can effectively participate in the legislative process and contribute to the governance of the country.
2. Education and Awareness: By the age of 25, most individuals have completed their higher education and have gained exposure to various socio-political issues. This requirement ensures that the candidates possess a certain level of education and awareness about the country's affairs.
3. Career Development: The age requirement allows individuals to establish themselves in their respective careers before entering politics. This ensures that the candidates bring diverse professional experiences and expertise to the Parliament, which can contribute to informed decision-making.
4. Stabilizing Factor: The age requirement acts as a stabilizing factor by preventing individuals who may not have the necessary maturity or understanding from holding important positions of power.
Conclusion
The minimum age requirement of 25 years for becoming a member of Lok Sabha is based on the principles of maturity, experience, education, and career development. It ensures that the candidates possess the necessary qualifications to effectively contribute to the legislative process and governance of the country.
To become a member of Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian Parliament, certain qualifications need to be fulfilled. One of these qualifications is the minimum age requirement. According to the Indian Constitution, a candidate aspiring to become a member of Lok Sabha should not be below 25 years of age. Let's understand the rationale behind this requirement.
Constitutional Provisions
The qualifications for membership of Lok Sabha are mentioned in Article 84 of the Indian Constitution. This article lays down the following conditions for eligibility:
1. Citizenship: The candidate must be a citizen of India.
2. Age: The candidate should not be less than 25 years of age.
3. Electoral Roll: The candidate must be registered as an elector for any parliamentary constituency.
4. Disqualifications: The candidate should not be disqualified under any law made by Parliament.
Reasoning behind the Age Requirement
The minimum age requirement of 25 years for Lok Sabha membership serves several purposes:
1. Maturity and Experience: By setting a minimum age, the Constitution ensures that the candidates have attained a certain level of maturity and experience. This ensures that the members can effectively participate in the legislative process and contribute to the governance of the country.
2. Education and Awareness: By the age of 25, most individuals have completed their higher education and have gained exposure to various socio-political issues. This requirement ensures that the candidates possess a certain level of education and awareness about the country's affairs.
3. Career Development: The age requirement allows individuals to establish themselves in their respective careers before entering politics. This ensures that the candidates bring diverse professional experiences and expertise to the Parliament, which can contribute to informed decision-making.
4. Stabilizing Factor: The age requirement acts as a stabilizing factor by preventing individuals who may not have the necessary maturity or understanding from holding important positions of power.
Conclusion
The minimum age requirement of 25 years for becoming a member of Lok Sabha is based on the principles of maturity, experience, education, and career development. It ensures that the candidates possess the necessary qualifications to effectively contribute to the legislative process and governance of the country.
The Speaker of Lok Sabha/Chairman of Rajya Sabha can- a)Participate in voting.
- b)Participate in voting, like other members.
- c)Both vote only in case of a tie.
- d)Only the Lok Sabha Speaker votes but the Chairman of Rajya Sabha cannot vote.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The Speaker of Lok Sabha/Chairman of Rajya Sabha can
a)
Participate in voting.
b)
Participate in voting, like other members.
c)
Both vote only in case of a tie.
d)
Only the Lok Sabha Speaker votes but the Chairman of Rajya Sabha cannot vote.
|
|
Kavya singhania answered |
The Speaker does not vote in the House except on those rare occasions when there is a tie at the end of a decision.
Chairman of Rajya Sabha has no vote except when there is a tie (article 100).
Chairman of Rajya Sabha has no vote except when there is a tie (article 100).
Which legislative power is enjoyed by the Governor?- a)He can summon or prorogue the State Legislature.
- b)He can appoint one-sixth of the members of the Legislative Council.
- c)He can nominate certain members of Anglo-Indian Community to the Legislative Assembly.
- d)All of these powers.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which legislative power is enjoyed by the Governor?
a)
He can summon or prorogue the State Legislature.
b)
He can appoint one-sixth of the members of the Legislative Council.
c)
He can nominate certain members of Anglo-Indian Community to the Legislative Assembly.
d)
All of these powers.
|
Malavika Rane answered |
The correct answer is option 'D', which states that the Governor enjoys all of these powers. Let's understand each of these powers in detail:
1. Summoning or Proroguing the State Legislature:
The Governor has the power to summon and prorogue the State Legislature. Summoning refers to calling a session of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council, while proroguing means ending a session. The Governor exercises this power on the advice of the Chief Minister or the State Cabinet. The summoning and proroguing of the legislature are essential for conducting legislative business, such as passing laws and discussing important issues.
2. Appointing one-sixth of the members of the Legislative Council:
The Governor appoints one-sixth of the members of the Legislative Council. The Legislative Council is the upper house of the State Legislature. The Governor exercises this power based on the recommendations of various stakeholders and in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution. These appointments are made to ensure representation from various sections of society and to provide expertise in specific fields.
3. Nominating certain members of the Anglo-Indian Community to the Legislative Assembly:
The Governor also has the power to nominate certain members of the Anglo-Indian Community to the Legislative Assembly. The Anglo-Indian Community represents the people of mixed Indian and European descent. This provision is made to ensure their representation in the legislative process. The Governor exercises this power based on the advice of the Chief Minister or the State Cabinet.
These powers are vested in the Governor to ensure the smooth functioning of the State Legislature and to maintain a balanced and representative legislative body. The Governor acts as the constitutional head and exercises these powers in accordance with the advice of the Chief Minister and the Council of Ministers. These powers help in maintaining the democratic fabric of the state and ensure the participation of various sections of society in the legislative process.
In conclusion, the Governor enjoys all of these powers: summoning or proroguing the State Legislature, appointing one-sixth of the members of the Legislative Council, and nominating certain members of the Anglo-Indian Community to the Legislative Assembly. These powers are essential for the effective functioning of the legislative process and ensuring representation from various sections of society.
1. Summoning or Proroguing the State Legislature:
The Governor has the power to summon and prorogue the State Legislature. Summoning refers to calling a session of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council, while proroguing means ending a session. The Governor exercises this power on the advice of the Chief Minister or the State Cabinet. The summoning and proroguing of the legislature are essential for conducting legislative business, such as passing laws and discussing important issues.
2. Appointing one-sixth of the members of the Legislative Council:
The Governor appoints one-sixth of the members of the Legislative Council. The Legislative Council is the upper house of the State Legislature. The Governor exercises this power based on the recommendations of various stakeholders and in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution. These appointments are made to ensure representation from various sections of society and to provide expertise in specific fields.
3. Nominating certain members of the Anglo-Indian Community to the Legislative Assembly:
The Governor also has the power to nominate certain members of the Anglo-Indian Community to the Legislative Assembly. The Anglo-Indian Community represents the people of mixed Indian and European descent. This provision is made to ensure their representation in the legislative process. The Governor exercises this power based on the advice of the Chief Minister or the State Cabinet.
These powers are vested in the Governor to ensure the smooth functioning of the State Legislature and to maintain a balanced and representative legislative body. The Governor acts as the constitutional head and exercises these powers in accordance with the advice of the Chief Minister and the Council of Ministers. These powers help in maintaining the democratic fabric of the state and ensure the participation of various sections of society in the legislative process.
In conclusion, the Governor enjoys all of these powers: summoning or proroguing the State Legislature, appointing one-sixth of the members of the Legislative Council, and nominating certain members of the Anglo-Indian Community to the Legislative Assembly. These powers are essential for the effective functioning of the legislative process and ensuring representation from various sections of society.
The only instance of the President exercising his power of veto related to- a)The Hindu Code Bill
- b)The PEPSU Appropriate Bill
- c)The Indian Post Office Amendment Bill
- d)The Dowry Prohibition Bill
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The only instance of the President exercising his power of veto related to
a)
The Hindu Code Bill
b)
The PEPSU Appropriate Bill
c)
The Indian Post Office Amendment Bill
d)
The Dowry Prohibition Bill
|
|
Shivangi sengupta answered |
The Exercise of Veto Power by the President:
The veto power of the President of India refers to the power of the President to reject a bill passed by the Parliament. The Indian Constitution grants the President three types of veto power, namely, absolute veto, suspensive veto, and pocket veto.
The Indian Post Office Amendment Bill:
Out of the many bills passed by the Parliament, the only instance of the President exercising his power of veto was related to the Indian Post Office Amendment Bill. This bill was passed by the Parliament in 1950, but the President exercised his suspensive veto power and sent it back to the Parliament for reconsideration.
Reasons for the Veto:
There were several reasons for the President's veto. Firstly, the bill proposed to transfer the control of the post office from the central government to the state governments, which was against the principles of national unity and integration. Secondly, the bill aimed to establish a separate postal service for the state of Hyderabad, which was not in the interest of the country as a whole. Thirdly, the bill proposed to establish a separate postal service for the state of Jammu and Kashmir, which was not acceptable to the President as it was against the principles of national integration.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Indian Post Office Amendment Bill was the only instance of the President exercising his power of veto. The President's veto was based on the grounds of national unity and integration, which are of utmost importance for the functioning of a democracy. The exercise of veto power by the President is a crucial aspect of the Indian Constitution, which ensures that the interests of the country as a whole are safeguarded.
The veto power of the President of India refers to the power of the President to reject a bill passed by the Parliament. The Indian Constitution grants the President three types of veto power, namely, absolute veto, suspensive veto, and pocket veto.
The Indian Post Office Amendment Bill:
Out of the many bills passed by the Parliament, the only instance of the President exercising his power of veto was related to the Indian Post Office Amendment Bill. This bill was passed by the Parliament in 1950, but the President exercised his suspensive veto power and sent it back to the Parliament for reconsideration.
Reasons for the Veto:
There were several reasons for the President's veto. Firstly, the bill proposed to transfer the control of the post office from the central government to the state governments, which was against the principles of national unity and integration. Secondly, the bill aimed to establish a separate postal service for the state of Hyderabad, which was not in the interest of the country as a whole. Thirdly, the bill proposed to establish a separate postal service for the state of Jammu and Kashmir, which was not acceptable to the President as it was against the principles of national integration.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Indian Post Office Amendment Bill was the only instance of the President exercising his power of veto. The President's veto was based on the grounds of national unity and integration, which are of utmost importance for the functioning of a democracy. The exercise of veto power by the President is a crucial aspect of the Indian Constitution, which ensures that the interests of the country as a whole are safeguarded.
The term of the Lok Sabha can be extended beyond its normal term of five years- a)by the President at his discretion
- b)by the President on the recommendation of the Election Commission
- c)by the President during all types of emergencies
- d)by the President during a national emergency only
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
The term of the Lok Sabha can be extended beyond its normal term of five years
a)
by the President at his discretion
b)
by the President on the recommendation of the Election Commission
c)
by the President during all types of emergencies
d)
by the President during a national emergency only
|
|
Sayali kapoor answered |
D is the correct option.During an emergency, the term of the Lok Sabha can be successively extended by intervals of up to one year, but not beyond six months after the state of emergency has been revoked.
Any charge for the impeachment of the President may be initiated- a)only in Rajya Sabha
- b)only in Lok Sabha
- c)only in joint session of Parliament
- d)in either House of Parliament
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Any charge for the impeachment of the President may be initiated
a)
only in Rajya Sabha
b)
only in Lok Sabha
c)
only in joint session of Parliament
d)
in either House of Parliament
|
Pranab Goyal answered |
Introduction:
The process of impeachment is a constitutional mechanism to remove the President of India from office if they are found guilty of violating the Constitution. The charge for the impeachment of the President can be initiated in either House of Parliament.
Explanation:
The Constitution of India provides for the impeachment of the President under Article 61. According to this article, the President can be impeached for violation of the Constitution. The process of impeachment involves several steps and requires the support of both Houses of Parliament.
Impeachment Process:
The process of impeachment can be initiated in either House of Parliament, i.e., the Rajya Sabha (Upper House) or the Lok Sabha (Lower House). The process begins with the introduction of a resolution containing the charges against the President. This resolution can be initiated by either House of Parliament.
Resolution in Either House:
The Constitution does not specify which House can initiate the resolution. Therefore, the charge for the impeachment of the President may be initiated in either House of Parliament. It is up to the Members of Parliament to decide in which House they want to introduce the resolution.
Approval by Special Majority:
Once the resolution is introduced, it must be passed by a special majority in the House where it was initiated. A special majority means a majority of the total membership of that House and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.
Investigation by a Committee:
If the resolution is passed by the House where it was initiated, it is then transmitted to the other House. The other House then investigates the charges against the President. For this purpose, a committee is constituted to investigate the charges. This committee presents its report to the House.
Vote in the Other House:
After the investigation, the resolution is put to vote in the other House. If the resolution is passed by a special majority in the second House as well, the President is considered impeached and removed from office.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the charge for the impeachment of the President can be initiated in either House of Parliament. The impeachment process involves the introduction of a resolution containing the charges, investigation by a committee, and voting in both Houses of Parliament. The support of a special majority is required for the resolution to pass in each House.
The process of impeachment is a constitutional mechanism to remove the President of India from office if they are found guilty of violating the Constitution. The charge for the impeachment of the President can be initiated in either House of Parliament.
Explanation:
The Constitution of India provides for the impeachment of the President under Article 61. According to this article, the President can be impeached for violation of the Constitution. The process of impeachment involves several steps and requires the support of both Houses of Parliament.
Impeachment Process:
The process of impeachment can be initiated in either House of Parliament, i.e., the Rajya Sabha (Upper House) or the Lok Sabha (Lower House). The process begins with the introduction of a resolution containing the charges against the President. This resolution can be initiated by either House of Parliament.
Resolution in Either House:
The Constitution does not specify which House can initiate the resolution. Therefore, the charge for the impeachment of the President may be initiated in either House of Parliament. It is up to the Members of Parliament to decide in which House they want to introduce the resolution.
Approval by Special Majority:
Once the resolution is introduced, it must be passed by a special majority in the House where it was initiated. A special majority means a majority of the total membership of that House and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.
Investigation by a Committee:
If the resolution is passed by the House where it was initiated, it is then transmitted to the other House. The other House then investigates the charges against the President. For this purpose, a committee is constituted to investigate the charges. This committee presents its report to the House.
Vote in the Other House:
After the investigation, the resolution is put to vote in the other House. If the resolution is passed by a special majority in the second House as well, the President is considered impeached and removed from office.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the charge for the impeachment of the President can be initiated in either House of Parliament. The impeachment process involves the introduction of a resolution containing the charges, investigation by a committee, and voting in both Houses of Parliament. The support of a special majority is required for the resolution to pass in each House.
The President of India can return the advice ofthe Cabinet for reconsideration- a)once only
- b)twice only
- c)any number of times
- d)not even once
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The President of India can return the advice ofthe Cabinet for reconsideration
a)
once only
b)
twice only
c)
any number of times
d)
not even once
|
|
Advait Banerjee answered |
The President of India is the head of the state and has various powers and responsibilities under the Constitution of India. One of the powers of the President is to return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration.
Explanation:
• The Cabinet is a group of senior ministers who advise the President on various matters of governance.
• The President is bound by the advice of the Cabinet, but he/she can return it for reconsideration if there are any reservations or concerns.
• The President can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration only once. This means that if the Cabinet resubmits the same advice, the President must accept it.
• However, the President can also seek further clarification or information from the Cabinet before deciding whether to accept or reject the advice.
Importance:
• The power of the President to return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration is an important check on the powers of the executive.
• It ensures that the Cabinet's advice is carefully considered and scrutinized before it is acted upon.
• It also allows the President to exercise his/her own judgment and discretion in matters of governance.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the President of India can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration only once. This power is an important check on the powers of the executive and allows the President to exercise his/her own judgment and discretion in matters of governance.
Explanation:
• The Cabinet is a group of senior ministers who advise the President on various matters of governance.
• The President is bound by the advice of the Cabinet, but he/she can return it for reconsideration if there are any reservations or concerns.
• The President can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration only once. This means that if the Cabinet resubmits the same advice, the President must accept it.
• However, the President can also seek further clarification or information from the Cabinet before deciding whether to accept or reject the advice.
Importance:
• The power of the President to return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration is an important check on the powers of the executive.
• It ensures that the Cabinet's advice is carefully considered and scrutinized before it is acted upon.
• It also allows the President to exercise his/her own judgment and discretion in matters of governance.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the President of India can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration only once. This power is an important check on the powers of the executive and allows the President to exercise his/her own judgment and discretion in matters of governance.
The first Joint Meeting of the Council of States and the House of People was held to discuss the- a)Bank Nationalization Bill
- b)Dowry Abolition Bill
- c)Gold Control Bill
- d)Hindu Code Bill
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The first Joint Meeting of the Council of States and the House of People was held to discuss the
a)
Bank Nationalization Bill
b)
Dowry Abolition Bill
c)
Gold Control Bill
d)
Hindu Code Bill
|
|
Nikhila desai answered |
The first Joint Meeting of the Council of States and the House of People was held to discuss the Dowry Abolition Bill.
The Dowry Abolition Bill was a significant piece of legislation aimed at eliminating the practice of dowry in India. The bill sought to prohibit the giving or receiving of dowry in marriages, as it was seen as a social evil that perpetuated gender inequality and financial exploitation of women.
Reason for the importance of the Dowry Abolition Bill:
- Dowry has been a longstanding issue in India, leading to various social problems such as domestic violence, harassment, and even dowry deaths.
- The bill aimed to address the root cause of dowry-related issues by making the practice illegal and punishable by law.
- It was a step towards promoting gender equality and empowering women in society.
Significance of holding the Joint Meeting:
- The decision to hold the Joint Meeting of the Council of States and the House of People indicated the importance and urgency of addressing the issue of dowry.
- It signified a collective effort by both houses of the parliament to discuss and deliberate on the implications of the Dowry Abolition Bill.
- The Joint Meeting allowed for a comprehensive discussion involving members from both houses, ensuring a thorough examination of the bill.
In conclusion, the first Joint Meeting of the Council of States and the House of People was convened to discuss the Dowry Abolition Bill, showcasing the government's commitment to tackling social issues and promoting gender equality in India.
Which one is NOT a parliamentary term?- a)Countdown
- b)Starred question
- c)Vote on account
- d)Question hour
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one is NOT a parliamentary term?
a)
Countdown
b)
Starred question
c)
Vote on account
d)
Question hour
|
|
Diksha bhatia answered |
**Explanation:**
In parliamentary systems of government, various terms and procedures are used to conduct legislative business. These terms have specific meanings and are used to regulate the functioning of the parliament.
Let's analyze each option to determine the correct answer:
a) Countdown: This term is not directly related to parliamentary procedures or terms. It generally refers to the act of counting down to a specific event or deadline. Therefore, this option is not a parliamentary term.
b) Starred question: In parliamentary systems, questions are an important tool for lawmakers to seek information from the government. A starred question is a type of question that requires an oral answer from the concerned minister on the floor of the house. These questions are marked with a star to distinguish them from other types of questions. Thus, starred question is a parliamentary term.
c) Vote on account: A vote on account is a provision that allows the government to obtain parliamentary approval for a limited period of expenditure before the full budget is presented. It is a mechanism to ensure the continuity of government spending in the interim period. Therefore, vote on account is a parliamentary term.
d) Question hour: Question hour is a specific period during the parliamentary session where Members of Parliament can ask questions to ministers and hold them accountable for their actions. It is an important part of parliamentary democracy and allows for the scrutiny of government policies and actions. Thus, question hour is a parliamentary term.
Based on the above analysis, we can conclude that option 'A' (Countdown) is not a parliamentary term.
In parliamentary systems of government, various terms and procedures are used to conduct legislative business. These terms have specific meanings and are used to regulate the functioning of the parliament.
Let's analyze each option to determine the correct answer:
a) Countdown: This term is not directly related to parliamentary procedures or terms. It generally refers to the act of counting down to a specific event or deadline. Therefore, this option is not a parliamentary term.
b) Starred question: In parliamentary systems, questions are an important tool for lawmakers to seek information from the government. A starred question is a type of question that requires an oral answer from the concerned minister on the floor of the house. These questions are marked with a star to distinguish them from other types of questions. Thus, starred question is a parliamentary term.
c) Vote on account: A vote on account is a provision that allows the government to obtain parliamentary approval for a limited period of expenditure before the full budget is presented. It is a mechanism to ensure the continuity of government spending in the interim period. Therefore, vote on account is a parliamentary term.
d) Question hour: Question hour is a specific period during the parliamentary session where Members of Parliament can ask questions to ministers and hold them accountable for their actions. It is an important part of parliamentary democracy and allows for the scrutiny of government policies and actions. Thus, question hour is a parliamentary term.
Based on the above analysis, we can conclude that option 'A' (Countdown) is not a parliamentary term.
The Parliament works through numerousc ommittees, whose members are- a)either appointed by the Speaker or elected byt he House.
- b)appointed by the Speaker.
- c)appointed by the Council of Ministers.
- d)appointed by the Minister for Parliamentary Affairs.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The Parliament works through numerousc ommittees, whose members are
a)
either appointed by the Speaker or elected byt he House.
b)
appointed by the Speaker.
c)
appointed by the Council of Ministers.
d)
appointed by the Minister for Parliamentary Affairs.
|
Rajat Das answered |
The correct answer is option 'A' - The members of the committees in Parliament are either appointed by the Speaker or elected by the House. Let's understand this answer in detail:
**Introduction to Committees in Parliament:**
In a parliamentary system, committees play a crucial role in the functioning of the legislature. These committees are smaller groups of Members of Parliament (MPs) who are responsible for examining and scrutinizing various aspects of legislation, government policies, and other matters of public importance. They are instrumental in ensuring thorough discussions, analysis, and oversight of government actions.
**Appointment and Election Process:**
The members of the committees are selected through a process involving both appointment and election. The specific process may vary depending on the committee and the parliament. However, in general, the following methods are used:
1. **Appointment by the Speaker:** The Speaker of the House has the authority to appoint members to various committees. The Speaker typically considers factors such as party representation, expertise, seniority, and other relevant considerations while making these appointments. This ensures a balanced representation of MPs from different parties and backgrounds.
2. **Election by the House:** In some cases, committees are formed through an election process conducted within the House. MPs have the opportunity to nominate themselves or other members for specific committee positions. The election is usually conducted through a voting process, and the candidates who secure the highest number of votes are elected to the respective committees.
**Purpose of Appointment and Election:**
The appointment and election of committee members serve different purposes:
1. **Expertise and Representation:** The appointment process allows the Speaker to ensure that committees comprise members with expertise and knowledge in relevant fields. This helps in effective scrutiny and examination of various matters.
2. **Democratic Participation:** The election process allows MPs to actively participate in the selection of committee members. It provides an opportunity for members to represent their interests and contribute to the decision-making process.
**Conclusion:**
In conclusion, the correct answer is option 'A' - the members of committees in Parliament are either appointed by the Speaker or elected by the House. This dual process ensures a well-rounded representation of MPs and allows for both expertise and democratic participation in the committee system. The committees play a vital role in the functioning of Parliament by examining legislation, policies, and other matters, thereby enhancing the scrutiny and oversight functions of the legislature.
**Introduction to Committees in Parliament:**
In a parliamentary system, committees play a crucial role in the functioning of the legislature. These committees are smaller groups of Members of Parliament (MPs) who are responsible for examining and scrutinizing various aspects of legislation, government policies, and other matters of public importance. They are instrumental in ensuring thorough discussions, analysis, and oversight of government actions.
**Appointment and Election Process:**
The members of the committees are selected through a process involving both appointment and election. The specific process may vary depending on the committee and the parliament. However, in general, the following methods are used:
1. **Appointment by the Speaker:** The Speaker of the House has the authority to appoint members to various committees. The Speaker typically considers factors such as party representation, expertise, seniority, and other relevant considerations while making these appointments. This ensures a balanced representation of MPs from different parties and backgrounds.
2. **Election by the House:** In some cases, committees are formed through an election process conducted within the House. MPs have the opportunity to nominate themselves or other members for specific committee positions. The election is usually conducted through a voting process, and the candidates who secure the highest number of votes are elected to the respective committees.
**Purpose of Appointment and Election:**
The appointment and election of committee members serve different purposes:
1. **Expertise and Representation:** The appointment process allows the Speaker to ensure that committees comprise members with expertise and knowledge in relevant fields. This helps in effective scrutiny and examination of various matters.
2. **Democratic Participation:** The election process allows MPs to actively participate in the selection of committee members. It provides an opportunity for members to represent their interests and contribute to the decision-making process.
**Conclusion:**
In conclusion, the correct answer is option 'A' - the members of committees in Parliament are either appointed by the Speaker or elected by the House. This dual process ensures a well-rounded representation of MPs and allows for both expertise and democratic participation in the committee system. The committees play a vital role in the functioning of Parliament by examining legislation, policies, and other matters, thereby enhancing the scrutiny and oversight functions of the legislature.
Which committee of Parliament is concerned with the regularity and economy in government expenditure?- a)Public Accounts Committee
- b)Estimates Committee
- c)Committee on Public Undertakings
- d)All of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which committee of Parliament is concerned with the regularity and economy in government expenditure?
a)
Public Accounts Committee
b)
Estimates Committee
c)
Committee on Public Undertakings
d)
All of the above
|
Jithin Mehra answered |
Answer:
The correct answer is option 'A' - Public Accounts Committee.
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is a committee of Parliament in India that is concerned with the regularity and economy in government expenditure. It is one of the oldest and most important committees of the Parliament and plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency and accountability in the financial matters of the government.
Role and Functions of the Public Accounts Committee:
1. Examining Audit Reports: The PAC examines the Audit Reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India, which highlight instances of financial irregularities, wasteful expenditure, and non-compliance with rules and regulations.
2. Scrutinizing Government Expenditure: The PAC scrutinizes the expenditure of the government and ensures that it is in line with the approved budgetary provisions. It examines the accounts showing the appropriation of sums granted by Parliament and suggests measures to improve the economy and efficiency in government expenditure.
3. Reviewing Performance Audit: The PAC also reviews the Performance Audit Reports of the CAG, which assess the efficiency and effectiveness of government programs and schemes. It examines whether the objectives of these programs are being achieved and if there is any scope for improvement.
4. Summoning Witnesses: The PAC has the power to summon witnesses and examine them under oath. It can call government officials, ministers, and other stakeholders to provide evidence and explanations regarding the financial matters under scrutiny.
5. Reporting to Parliament: After examining the Audit Reports and conducting its inquiries, the PAC presents its findings and recommendations to Parliament. These reports are then discussed and debated in the Parliament, which helps in ensuring accountability and transparency in government expenditure.
Overall, the Public Accounts Committee plays a crucial role in ensuring regularity and economy in government expenditure. It acts as a watchdog and holds the government accountable for its financial decisions and actions. By examining audit reports, scrutinizing government expenditure, and reviewing performance audits, the PAC contributes to the efficient and effective use of public funds.
The correct answer is option 'A' - Public Accounts Committee.
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) is a committee of Parliament in India that is concerned with the regularity and economy in government expenditure. It is one of the oldest and most important committees of the Parliament and plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency and accountability in the financial matters of the government.
Role and Functions of the Public Accounts Committee:
1. Examining Audit Reports: The PAC examines the Audit Reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India, which highlight instances of financial irregularities, wasteful expenditure, and non-compliance with rules and regulations.
2. Scrutinizing Government Expenditure: The PAC scrutinizes the expenditure of the government and ensures that it is in line with the approved budgetary provisions. It examines the accounts showing the appropriation of sums granted by Parliament and suggests measures to improve the economy and efficiency in government expenditure.
3. Reviewing Performance Audit: The PAC also reviews the Performance Audit Reports of the CAG, which assess the efficiency and effectiveness of government programs and schemes. It examines whether the objectives of these programs are being achieved and if there is any scope for improvement.
4. Summoning Witnesses: The PAC has the power to summon witnesses and examine them under oath. It can call government officials, ministers, and other stakeholders to provide evidence and explanations regarding the financial matters under scrutiny.
5. Reporting to Parliament: After examining the Audit Reports and conducting its inquiries, the PAC presents its findings and recommendations to Parliament. These reports are then discussed and debated in the Parliament, which helps in ensuring accountability and transparency in government expenditure.
Overall, the Public Accounts Committee plays a crucial role in ensuring regularity and economy in government expenditure. It acts as a watchdog and holds the government accountable for its financial decisions and actions. By examining audit reports, scrutinizing government expenditure, and reviewing performance audits, the PAC contributes to the efficient and effective use of public funds.
Who reserves the right to convene a joint session of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha?- a)Speaker of the Lok Sabha
- b)Chairman of the Rajya Sabha
- c)The President
- d)The Prime Minister
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Who reserves the right to convene a joint session of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha?
a)
Speaker of the Lok Sabha
b)
Chairman of the Rajya Sabha
c)
The President
d)
The Prime Minister
|
|
Shubham Desai answered |
The correct answer is option 'C' - The President.
Explanation:
The Constitution of India provides for a bicameral legislature at the central level, consisting of two houses - the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). These two houses have distinct powers and functions, but in certain circumstances, they can come together in a joint session.
A joint session of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha is convened under specific circumstances, such as:
1. When a Bill has been passed by one house but is rejected or amended by the other house: In such a situation, if both houses cannot reach a consensus through a process of negotiation, the President may summon a joint session to resolve the deadlock. The joint session is called to consider and pass the Bill, and the decision is taken by a simple majority of the members present and voting.
2. When the President desires to address both houses: The President of India, as the head of the state, has the power to address both houses of Parliament assembled together. This may occur at the commencement of the first session after each general election, at the beginning of the first session of each year, or at any other time the President deems necessary.
The power to convene a joint session lies with the President, and they exercise this power on the advice of the Council of Ministers. The President acts as the constitutional head and guardian of the legislative process, ensuring the smooth functioning of Parliament.
It is important to note that the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha do not have the authority to convene a joint session on their own. The decision to convene a joint session is ultimately made by the President, who acts on the advice of the government.
In conclusion, the President reserves the right to convene a joint session of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha under specific circumstances outlined in the Constitution of India.
Explanation:
The Constitution of India provides for a bicameral legislature at the central level, consisting of two houses - the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). These two houses have distinct powers and functions, but in certain circumstances, they can come together in a joint session.
A joint session of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha is convened under specific circumstances, such as:
1. When a Bill has been passed by one house but is rejected or amended by the other house: In such a situation, if both houses cannot reach a consensus through a process of negotiation, the President may summon a joint session to resolve the deadlock. The joint session is called to consider and pass the Bill, and the decision is taken by a simple majority of the members present and voting.
2. When the President desires to address both houses: The President of India, as the head of the state, has the power to address both houses of Parliament assembled together. This may occur at the commencement of the first session after each general election, at the beginning of the first session of each year, or at any other time the President deems necessary.
The power to convene a joint session lies with the President, and they exercise this power on the advice of the Council of Ministers. The President acts as the constitutional head and guardian of the legislative process, ensuring the smooth functioning of Parliament.
It is important to note that the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha do not have the authority to convene a joint session on their own. The decision to convene a joint session is ultimately made by the President, who acts on the advice of the government.
In conclusion, the President reserves the right to convene a joint session of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha under specific circumstances outlined in the Constitution of India.
A Governor can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration- a)once only
- b)twice only
- c)any number of times
- d)not even once
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
A Governor can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration
a)
once only
b)
twice only
c)
any number of times
d)
not even once
|
|
Rajni chauhan answered |
Governor and Cabinet reconsideration
Overview:
The Governor is the head of the state and is assisted by the Council of Ministers. The Council of Ministers is also known as the Cabinet. The Cabinet is responsible for advising the Governor on various matters. However, there may be instances where the Governor may not agree with the Cabinet's advice. In such cases, the Governor can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration.
Explanation:
The Constitution of India provides for the Governor to act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. However, the Governor is not bound to accept the advice of the Council of Ministers. In case the Governor does not agree with the advice of the Council of Ministers, the Governor can return the advice for reconsideration.
The Governor can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration only once. This means that the Governor can send back the advice to the Cabinet with his/her suggestions and comments. The Cabinet will then reconsider the advice in light of the Governor's suggestions and comments and send it back to the Governor for his/her consideration.
If the Governor still does not agree with the advice, he/she can either give his/her assent to the advice or withhold it. If the Governor withholds his/her assent, the matter may be referred to the President of India for his/her decision.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Governor can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration only once. This is an important power of the Governor that ensures that the advice of the Council of Ministers is carefully considered before any decision is taken.
Overview:
The Governor is the head of the state and is assisted by the Council of Ministers. The Council of Ministers is also known as the Cabinet. The Cabinet is responsible for advising the Governor on various matters. However, there may be instances where the Governor may not agree with the Cabinet's advice. In such cases, the Governor can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration.
Explanation:
The Constitution of India provides for the Governor to act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. However, the Governor is not bound to accept the advice of the Council of Ministers. In case the Governor does not agree with the advice of the Council of Ministers, the Governor can return the advice for reconsideration.
The Governor can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration only once. This means that the Governor can send back the advice to the Cabinet with his/her suggestions and comments. The Cabinet will then reconsider the advice in light of the Governor's suggestions and comments and send it back to the Governor for his/her consideration.
If the Governor still does not agree with the advice, he/she can either give his/her assent to the advice or withhold it. If the Governor withholds his/her assent, the matter may be referred to the President of India for his/her decision.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the Governor can return the advice of the Cabinet for reconsideration only once. This is an important power of the Governor that ensures that the advice of the Council of Ministers is carefully considered before any decision is taken.
The Legislative Council in a State can be abolished by Parliament on the recommendation of- a)The Governor
- b)Legislative Assembly
- c)The President
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The Legislative Council in a State can be abolished by Parliament on the recommendation of
a)
The Governor
b)
Legislative Assembly
c)
The President
d)
None of these
|
Kavya Sharma answered |
option b is correct because it requires parliament approval after legislative assembly recommendation for abolishment or creation of the council.The size of the legislative council cannot be more than one-third the membership of the legislative assembly.However; its size cannot be less than 40 members (except in Jammu and Kashmir, where there are 36 by an Act of Parliament.
After which Amendment in Article 74 was the word ‘may’ replaced with ‘shall’ is to clarify that the President shall exercise his functions in accordance with the advice of the council ofministers?- a)40th
- b)42nd
- c)44th
- d)39th
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
After which Amendment in Article 74 was the word ‘may’ replaced with ‘shall’ is to clarify that the President shall exercise his functions in accordance with the advice of the council ofministers?
a)
40th
b)
42nd
c)
44th
d)
39th
|
|
Nivedita desai answered |
"aid and advice" added to describe the function of the Council of Ministers to the President of India?
The word "aid and advice" was added to Article 74 by the 42nd Amendment in 1976.
The word "aid and advice" was added to Article 74 by the 42nd Amendment in 1976.
The minimum age for the Governor of a State is- a)25 years
- b)35 years
- c)30 years
- d)40 years
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The minimum age for the Governor of a State is
a)
25 years
b)
35 years
c)
30 years
d)
40 years
|
|
Malavika Rane answered |
Minimum age for the Governor of a State is 35 years
The correct answer is option 'B', which states that the minimum age for the Governor of a State is 35 years. Let's explore the reasoning behind this.
Explanation:
The Governor is the constitutional head of a state and holds a significant position in the governance of the state. The Constitution of India has laid down certain qualifications for a person to be eligible for the post of Governor. The minimum age requirement is one such qualification.
Constitutional provisions:
The qualifications for the Governor of a State are mentioned in Article 157 of the Indian Constitution. According to this article, a person must possess the following qualifications to be eligible for the post:
1. He/she must be a citizen of India.
2. He/she must have completed the age of 35 years.
Reasoning:
The minimum age requirement of 35 years for the Governor of a State is set to ensure that the person appointed to this position has sufficient maturity, experience, and knowledge to handle the responsibilities associated with the role. The Governor is responsible for various functions, such as:
1. Executive powers: The Governor exercises executive powers on behalf of the President of India. These powers include the appointment and removal of various state officials, approval of ordinances, and summoning and proroguing the state legislature.
2. Legislative powers: The Governor plays a crucial role in the state legislative process. He/she addresses the state legislature, gives assent to bills passed by the state legislature, and can send bills for reconsideration.
3. Constitutional guardian: The Governor acts as a constitutional guardian and ensures that the state government functions in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.
Given the importance of these functions, it is necessary for the Governor to have attained a certain level of maturity and experience. The minimum age requirement of 35 years helps ensure that individuals appointed to this position have gained sufficient knowledge and experience in public affairs.
Therefore, option 'B' - 35 years - is the correct answer as per the constitutional provisions and the reasoning explained above.
The correct answer is option 'B', which states that the minimum age for the Governor of a State is 35 years. Let's explore the reasoning behind this.
Explanation:
The Governor is the constitutional head of a state and holds a significant position in the governance of the state. The Constitution of India has laid down certain qualifications for a person to be eligible for the post of Governor. The minimum age requirement is one such qualification.
Constitutional provisions:
The qualifications for the Governor of a State are mentioned in Article 157 of the Indian Constitution. According to this article, a person must possess the following qualifications to be eligible for the post:
1. He/she must be a citizen of India.
2. He/she must have completed the age of 35 years.
Reasoning:
The minimum age requirement of 35 years for the Governor of a State is set to ensure that the person appointed to this position has sufficient maturity, experience, and knowledge to handle the responsibilities associated with the role. The Governor is responsible for various functions, such as:
1. Executive powers: The Governor exercises executive powers on behalf of the President of India. These powers include the appointment and removal of various state officials, approval of ordinances, and summoning and proroguing the state legislature.
2. Legislative powers: The Governor plays a crucial role in the state legislative process. He/she addresses the state legislature, gives assent to bills passed by the state legislature, and can send bills for reconsideration.
3. Constitutional guardian: The Governor acts as a constitutional guardian and ensures that the state government functions in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.
Given the importance of these functions, it is necessary for the Governor to have attained a certain level of maturity and experience. The minimum age requirement of 35 years helps ensure that individuals appointed to this position have gained sufficient knowledge and experience in public affairs.
Therefore, option 'B' - 35 years - is the correct answer as per the constitutional provisions and the reasoning explained above.
A person born to Indian parents on 01-01- 1990 became eligible for the Legislative Assembly elections of his State in- a)2008
- b)2009
- c)2010
- d)2015
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
A person born to Indian parents on 01-01- 1990 became eligible for the Legislative Assembly elections of his State in
a)
2008
b)
2009
c)
2010
d)
2015
|
|
Bhoomika patel answered |
The eligibility to contest in Legislative Assembly elections in India is determined by the Constitution of India and the relevant laws of each state. To understand why the correct answer is option 'D' (2015), we need to consider the age requirement and the duration of residency.
1. Age requirement:
To be eligible to contest in Legislative Assembly elections in most states, a person must be at least 25 years old. The person in question was born on 01-01-1990, so we need to determine when they would turn 25.
- On 01-01-2015, the person would have turned 25 years old. Therefore, they would have met the age requirement to be eligible for the Legislative Assembly elections.
2. Duration of residency:
In addition to the age requirement, a person must also fulfill the residency requirement. This typically involves being a resident of the state for a minimum period of time, which varies from state to state.
Since the question does not mention any specific state, we cannot determine the exact residency requirement. However, it is safe to assume that the person would have had sufficient time to meet the residency requirement by 2015, considering that they were born to Indian parents.
Therefore, based on the age requirement and assuming the person meets the residency requirement, the correct answer is option 'D' (2015).
It is important to note that the eligibility criteria for Legislative Assembly elections may vary slightly from state to state. However, the age requirement of 25 years is generally consistent across states. To determine the exact eligibility of a person in a specific state, it is necessary to refer to the laws and regulations of that particular state.
1. Age requirement:
To be eligible to contest in Legislative Assembly elections in most states, a person must be at least 25 years old. The person in question was born on 01-01-1990, so we need to determine when they would turn 25.
- On 01-01-2015, the person would have turned 25 years old. Therefore, they would have met the age requirement to be eligible for the Legislative Assembly elections.
2. Duration of residency:
In addition to the age requirement, a person must also fulfill the residency requirement. This typically involves being a resident of the state for a minimum period of time, which varies from state to state.
Since the question does not mention any specific state, we cannot determine the exact residency requirement. However, it is safe to assume that the person would have had sufficient time to meet the residency requirement by 2015, considering that they were born to Indian parents.
Therefore, based on the age requirement and assuming the person meets the residency requirement, the correct answer is option 'D' (2015).
It is important to note that the eligibility criteria for Legislative Assembly elections may vary slightly from state to state. However, the age requirement of 25 years is generally consistent across states. To determine the exact eligibility of a person in a specific state, it is necessary to refer to the laws and regulations of that particular state.
The President of India is elected by- a)Proportional representation by a list system
- b)Proportional representation by a single transferable vote.
- c)List system
- d)Single member territorial representation
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The President of India is elected by
a)
Proportional representation by a list system
b)
Proportional representation by a single transferable vote.
c)
List system
d)
Single member territorial representation
|
|
Sakshi mehta answered |
Election of President of India
The President of India is the head of state and the commander-in-chief of the Indian Armed Forces. The President is elected by an Electoral College that consists of:
- Members of both Houses of Parliament
- Members of the Legislative Assemblies of all States
- Members of the Legislative Assemblies of the Union Territories of Delhi and Puducherry.
Proportional Representation by Single Transferable Vote (STV)
The President is elected by a system of Proportional Representation by Single Transferable Vote (STV). This means that voters rank the candidates in order of preference, and the winning candidate needs to reach a certain quota of votes to win.
The STV system is used to ensure that the President is elected with broad support from a diverse range of voters. It also allows for a more nuanced expression of voter preferences, as voters can rank their preferred candidates in order of preference.
Other Methods of Election
In the past, the President of India was elected by a system of Proportional Representation by a List System, which involved voters choosing a party or coalition and the party selecting the President from a list of candidates.
There have also been proposals to elect the President by a system of Single Member Territorial Representation, where voters would elect their local representative who would then vote for the President on their behalf. However, this proposal has not been implemented.
Conclusion
Thus, the correct answer to the question is option B - Proportional Representation by Single Transferable Vote (STV), which is the current method of electing the President of India.
The President of India is the head of state and the commander-in-chief of the Indian Armed Forces. The President is elected by an Electoral College that consists of:
- Members of both Houses of Parliament
- Members of the Legislative Assemblies of all States
- Members of the Legislative Assemblies of the Union Territories of Delhi and Puducherry.
Proportional Representation by Single Transferable Vote (STV)
The President is elected by a system of Proportional Representation by Single Transferable Vote (STV). This means that voters rank the candidates in order of preference, and the winning candidate needs to reach a certain quota of votes to win.
The STV system is used to ensure that the President is elected with broad support from a diverse range of voters. It also allows for a more nuanced expression of voter preferences, as voters can rank their preferred candidates in order of preference.
Other Methods of Election
In the past, the President of India was elected by a system of Proportional Representation by a List System, which involved voters choosing a party or coalition and the party selecting the President from a list of candidates.
There have also been proposals to elect the President by a system of Single Member Territorial Representation, where voters would elect their local representative who would then vote for the President on their behalf. However, this proposal has not been implemented.
Conclusion
Thus, the correct answer to the question is option B - Proportional Representation by Single Transferable Vote (STV), which is the current method of electing the President of India.
Who can dissolve the Lok Sabha before the expiry of it normal term of five years?- a)The President
- b)The Prime Minister
- c)The President on the recommendation of the Prime Minister
- d)The President on the recommendation of the Speaker
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Who can dissolve the Lok Sabha before the expiry of it normal term of five years?
a)
The President
b)
The Prime Minister
c)
The President on the recommendation of the Prime Minister
d)
The President on the recommendation of the Speaker
|
Mira das answered |
Explanation:
The dissolution of the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian Parliament, before the completion of its normal term of five years can only be done by the President on the recommendation of the Prime Minister. This is stated in Article 85(2)(b) of the Constitution of India.
Article 85(2)(b):
According to this provision, the President has the power to dissolve the Lok Sabha before the expiry of its term, if the Prime Minister advises him to do so.
The President's Role:
The President of India is the head of state and the first citizen of the country. Although he/she is a constitutional figurehead, the President performs some important functions, including the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. However, the President cannot exercise this power on his/her own and requires the recommendation of the Prime Minister.
Prime Minister's Role:
The Prime Minister is the head of government and the leader of the ruling political party or coalition in the Lok Sabha. The Prime Minister holds significant powers and responsibilities, including the power to advise the President on matters relating to the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
Recommendation of the Prime Minister:
In order for the President to dissolve the Lok Sabha before the completion of its term, the Prime Minister must recommend it. This means that the Prime Minister, who is accountable to the Lok Sabha, initiates the process of dissolution by advising the President to exercise his/her power.
Significance:
The provision for the dissolution of the Lok Sabha allows for early elections to be conducted in the country. It provides a mechanism for the government to seek a fresh mandate from the people if it feels that the current political situation warrants it.
Overall, the power to dissolve the Lok Sabha before the completion of its term lies with the President, but it can only be exercised on the recommendation of the Prime Minister. This ensures that the decision to dissolve the Lok Sabha is a political one, taken by the executive branch of the government.
The dissolution of the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian Parliament, before the completion of its normal term of five years can only be done by the President on the recommendation of the Prime Minister. This is stated in Article 85(2)(b) of the Constitution of India.
Article 85(2)(b):
According to this provision, the President has the power to dissolve the Lok Sabha before the expiry of its term, if the Prime Minister advises him to do so.
The President's Role:
The President of India is the head of state and the first citizen of the country. Although he/she is a constitutional figurehead, the President performs some important functions, including the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. However, the President cannot exercise this power on his/her own and requires the recommendation of the Prime Minister.
Prime Minister's Role:
The Prime Minister is the head of government and the leader of the ruling political party or coalition in the Lok Sabha. The Prime Minister holds significant powers and responsibilities, including the power to advise the President on matters relating to the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
Recommendation of the Prime Minister:
In order for the President to dissolve the Lok Sabha before the completion of its term, the Prime Minister must recommend it. This means that the Prime Minister, who is accountable to the Lok Sabha, initiates the process of dissolution by advising the President to exercise his/her power.
Significance:
The provision for the dissolution of the Lok Sabha allows for early elections to be conducted in the country. It provides a mechanism for the government to seek a fresh mandate from the people if it feels that the current political situation warrants it.
Overall, the power to dissolve the Lok Sabha before the completion of its term lies with the President, but it can only be exercised on the recommendation of the Prime Minister. This ensures that the decision to dissolve the Lok Sabha is a political one, taken by the executive branch of the government.
If a vote of ‘no confidence’ is passed by the legislature against the Prime Minister,- a)only the Cabinet resigns
- b)only the Prime Minister has to resign
- c)The Prime Minister, Cabinet Ministers and allother Ministers have to resign
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
If a vote of ‘no confidence’ is passed by the legislature against the Prime Minister,
a)
only the Cabinet resigns
b)
only the Prime Minister has to resign
c)
The Prime Minister, Cabinet Ministers and allother Ministers have to resign
d)
None of the above
|
|
Nilanjan Sen answered |
Explanation:
Consequences of a Vote of 'No Confidence' against the Prime Minister:
- The Prime Minister, Cabinet Ministers, and all other Ministers have to resign: If a vote of 'no confidence' is passed against the Prime Minister by the legislature, it signifies that the legislators have lost faith in the leadership of the Prime Minister and the government. In such a scenario, not only the Prime Minister but also the entire Cabinet, which consists of Cabinet Ministers, and all other Ministers holding portfolios have to resign. This is because the government as a whole is deemed unfit to continue leading the country.
- Collective responsibility of the government: In parliamentary systems of government, there is a principle of collective responsibility. This means that the government operates as a collective entity, and all members of the Cabinet and other Ministers are collectively responsible for the decisions and actions of the government. Therefore, if a vote of 'no confidence' is passed against the Prime Minister, it reflects a lack of confidence in the entire government and not just the Prime Minister individually.
- Constitutional implications: The resignation of the Prime Minister and the entire government following a vote of 'no confidence' can have significant constitutional implications. It may lead to the formation of a new government, through the appointment of a new Prime Minister and the reconstitution of the Cabinet. Alternatively, it may necessitate the calling of fresh elections to allow the electorate to choose a new government.
Therefore, in the event of a vote of 'no confidence' being passed against the Prime Minister, the resignation of the Prime Minister, Cabinet Ministers, and all other Ministers is the likely outcome, as per the principles of parliamentary democracy and collective responsibility.
Consequences of a Vote of 'No Confidence' against the Prime Minister:
- The Prime Minister, Cabinet Ministers, and all other Ministers have to resign: If a vote of 'no confidence' is passed against the Prime Minister by the legislature, it signifies that the legislators have lost faith in the leadership of the Prime Minister and the government. In such a scenario, not only the Prime Minister but also the entire Cabinet, which consists of Cabinet Ministers, and all other Ministers holding portfolios have to resign. This is because the government as a whole is deemed unfit to continue leading the country.
- Collective responsibility of the government: In parliamentary systems of government, there is a principle of collective responsibility. This means that the government operates as a collective entity, and all members of the Cabinet and other Ministers are collectively responsible for the decisions and actions of the government. Therefore, if a vote of 'no confidence' is passed against the Prime Minister, it reflects a lack of confidence in the entire government and not just the Prime Minister individually.
- Constitutional implications: The resignation of the Prime Minister and the entire government following a vote of 'no confidence' can have significant constitutional implications. It may lead to the formation of a new government, through the appointment of a new Prime Minister and the reconstitution of the Cabinet. Alternatively, it may necessitate the calling of fresh elections to allow the electorate to choose a new government.
Therefore, in the event of a vote of 'no confidence' being passed against the Prime Minister, the resignation of the Prime Minister, Cabinet Ministers, and all other Ministers is the likely outcome, as per the principles of parliamentary democracy and collective responsibility.
Which of the following is appointed by the President?- a)Judges of the High Courts
- b)Lt. Governors of Union Territories
- c) Chief Justice of India
- d)All the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following is appointed by the President?
a)
Judges of the High Courts
b)
Lt. Governors of Union Territories
c)
Chief Justice of India
d)
All the above
|
|
Rajveer Sen answered |
The President's Appointment Powers:
The President of India holds significant powers and responsibilities, including the power to appoint various key positions in the country. Some of the important appointments made by the President include judges of the High Courts, Lt. Governors of Union Territories, and the Chief Justice of India.
Judges of the High Courts:
- The President appoints judges of the High Courts in consultation with the Chief Justice of India and the Governor of the respective state.
- The President has the authority to appoint judges to ensure the independence and impartiality of the judiciary.
- The appointment process involves careful consideration of the candidate's qualifications, experience, and integrity.
Lt. Governors of Union Territories:
- The President appoints the Lt. Governors of Union Territories (UTs) on the advice of the Union Council of Ministers.
- The Lt. Governor acts as the representative of the President in the UTs and exercises the powers and functions delegated to them.
- The appointment of the Lt. Governor is crucial in ensuring effective governance and administration in the UTs.
Chief Justice of India:
- The President appoints the Chief Justice of India, the highest-ranking judicial officer in the country.
- The appointment is made based on the recommendation of the outgoing Chief Justice of India.
- The Chief Justice of India plays a crucial role in leading and managing the judicial system and ensuring its independence and impartiality.
The Significance of Presidential Appointments:
- The President's appointment powers are essential for maintaining the balance of power and ensuring the smooth functioning of the government.
- These appointments are crucial in upholding the principles of separation of powers and checks and balances.
- The President's role in appointing judges, Lt. Governors, and the Chief Justice of India helps ensure the independence, efficiency, and effectiveness of these positions.
Overall, the President's appointment powers are vital for ensuring the proper functioning of the judiciary, administration, and governance in the country. The appointments of judges of the High Courts, Lt. Governors of Union Territories, and the Chief Justice of India are significant decisions that require careful consideration and consultation, allowing for an efficient and independent system of governance.
The President of India holds significant powers and responsibilities, including the power to appoint various key positions in the country. Some of the important appointments made by the President include judges of the High Courts, Lt. Governors of Union Territories, and the Chief Justice of India.
Judges of the High Courts:
- The President appoints judges of the High Courts in consultation with the Chief Justice of India and the Governor of the respective state.
- The President has the authority to appoint judges to ensure the independence and impartiality of the judiciary.
- The appointment process involves careful consideration of the candidate's qualifications, experience, and integrity.
Lt. Governors of Union Territories:
- The President appoints the Lt. Governors of Union Territories (UTs) on the advice of the Union Council of Ministers.
- The Lt. Governor acts as the representative of the President in the UTs and exercises the powers and functions delegated to them.
- The appointment of the Lt. Governor is crucial in ensuring effective governance and administration in the UTs.
Chief Justice of India:
- The President appoints the Chief Justice of India, the highest-ranking judicial officer in the country.
- The appointment is made based on the recommendation of the outgoing Chief Justice of India.
- The Chief Justice of India plays a crucial role in leading and managing the judicial system and ensuring its independence and impartiality.
The Significance of Presidential Appointments:
- The President's appointment powers are essential for maintaining the balance of power and ensuring the smooth functioning of the government.
- These appointments are crucial in upholding the principles of separation of powers and checks and balances.
- The President's role in appointing judges, Lt. Governors, and the Chief Justice of India helps ensure the independence, efficiency, and effectiveness of these positions.
Overall, the President's appointment powers are vital for ensuring the proper functioning of the judiciary, administration, and governance in the country. The appointments of judges of the High Courts, Lt. Governors of Union Territories, and the Chief Justice of India are significant decisions that require careful consideration and consultation, allowing for an efficient and independent system of governance.
The satisfaction of President for any provision means- a)Satisfaction of the President in person
- b)Satisfaction of the President in a constitutional sense i.e. the satisfaction of his council of ministers
- c)Both A and B
- d)Satisfaction on the basis of recommendations of the Governor
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The satisfaction of President for any provision means
a)
Satisfaction of the President in person
b)
Satisfaction of the President in a constitutional sense i.e. the satisfaction of his council of ministers
c)
Both A and B
d)
Satisfaction on the basis of recommendations of the Governor
|
|
Om Chaudhary answered |
The Satisfaction of the President for any provision
The satisfaction of the President for any provision refers to the requirement of the President's satisfaction in order to give assent to a particular provision or legislation. The correct answer to the given question is option 'B', which states that it is the satisfaction of the President in a constitutional sense, i.e., the satisfaction of his council of ministers.
Explanation:
The Constitution of India grants the President certain powers and functions, including the power to give assent to bills passed by Parliament. However, there are certain provisions in the Constitution that require the President's satisfaction before giving his assent. This means that the President must be satisfied that the provision meets certain criteria or requirements before he can give his approval.
Satisfaction of the President in a constitutional sense:
In the context of the question, the satisfaction of the President refers to his satisfaction in a constitutional sense, which means that it is the satisfaction of his council of ministers. The President acts on the advice of the council of ministers in most matters, including the giving of assent to bills. Therefore, when a provision requires the President's satisfaction, it means that the council of ministers must be satisfied with the provision before it is presented to the President for his assent.
Importance of the council of ministers:
The council of ministers plays a crucial role in the functioning of the President's office. They are responsible for advising the President on various matters, including the giving of assent to bills. The Constitution vests the executive power of the Union in the President, but this power is to be exercised on the aid and advice of the council of ministers. Therefore, the satisfaction of the President is essentially the satisfaction of his council of ministers.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the satisfaction of the President for any provision refers to the requirement of the President's satisfaction before giving his assent to a particular provision or legislation. This satisfaction is based on the advice and satisfaction of his council of ministers. Thus, option 'B' is the correct answer to the given question.
The satisfaction of the President for any provision refers to the requirement of the President's satisfaction in order to give assent to a particular provision or legislation. The correct answer to the given question is option 'B', which states that it is the satisfaction of the President in a constitutional sense, i.e., the satisfaction of his council of ministers.
Explanation:
The Constitution of India grants the President certain powers and functions, including the power to give assent to bills passed by Parliament. However, there are certain provisions in the Constitution that require the President's satisfaction before giving his assent. This means that the President must be satisfied that the provision meets certain criteria or requirements before he can give his approval.
Satisfaction of the President in a constitutional sense:
In the context of the question, the satisfaction of the President refers to his satisfaction in a constitutional sense, which means that it is the satisfaction of his council of ministers. The President acts on the advice of the council of ministers in most matters, including the giving of assent to bills. Therefore, when a provision requires the President's satisfaction, it means that the council of ministers must be satisfied with the provision before it is presented to the President for his assent.
Importance of the council of ministers:
The council of ministers plays a crucial role in the functioning of the President's office. They are responsible for advising the President on various matters, including the giving of assent to bills. The Constitution vests the executive power of the Union in the President, but this power is to be exercised on the aid and advice of the council of ministers. Therefore, the satisfaction of the President is essentially the satisfaction of his council of ministers.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the satisfaction of the President for any provision refers to the requirement of the President's satisfaction before giving his assent to a particular provision or legislation. This satisfaction is based on the advice and satisfaction of his council of ministers. Thus, option 'B' is the correct answer to the given question.
The Constitution provides for the nomination of two members to the Lok Sabha by the President to represent the- a)Parsis
- b)Men of eminence
- c)Business community
- d)Anglo-Indians
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
The Constitution provides for the nomination of two members to the Lok Sabha by the President to represent the
a)
Parsis
b)
Men of eminence
c)
Business community
d)
Anglo-Indians
|
|
Garima malhotra answered |
Nomination of Members to the Lok Sabha
The Lok Sabha, as the lower house of India's Parliament, plays a crucial role in the legislative process. The Constitution provides specific provisions regarding the nomination of members.
Constitutional Provision
- Article 331 of the Indian Constitution allows the President to nominate up to two members of the Lok Sabha.
- This nomination is specifically aimed at representing the Anglo-Indian community, which was once a distinct cultural group in India.
Significance of the Nomination
- The intention behind this provision was to ensure that the interests of the Anglo-Indian community were represented in the Lok Sabha.
- This community has a unique historical background, and their representation was deemed important for the diversity of Indian parliamentary democracy.
Current Status
- It is important to note that the provision for nominating Anglo-Indians was effectively rendered obsolete by the 104th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019.
- The amendment removed the provision for the nomination of Anglo-Indians, indicating a shift in focus towards more inclusive representation of other communities.
Conclusion
- While the correct answer to the question is option 'D' (Anglo-Indians), it's essential to recognize the evolving nature of representation in India's parliamentary system.
- The changes reflect the dynamic socio-political landscape of the country, as the Constitution adapts to contemporary needs and demographics.
The Lok Sabha, as the lower house of India's Parliament, plays a crucial role in the legislative process. The Constitution provides specific provisions regarding the nomination of members.
Constitutional Provision
- Article 331 of the Indian Constitution allows the President to nominate up to two members of the Lok Sabha.
- This nomination is specifically aimed at representing the Anglo-Indian community, which was once a distinct cultural group in India.
Significance of the Nomination
- The intention behind this provision was to ensure that the interests of the Anglo-Indian community were represented in the Lok Sabha.
- This community has a unique historical background, and their representation was deemed important for the diversity of Indian parliamentary democracy.
Current Status
- It is important to note that the provision for nominating Anglo-Indians was effectively rendered obsolete by the 104th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019.
- The amendment removed the provision for the nomination of Anglo-Indians, indicating a shift in focus towards more inclusive representation of other communities.
Conclusion
- While the correct answer to the question is option 'D' (Anglo-Indians), it's essential to recognize the evolving nature of representation in India's parliamentary system.
- The changes reflect the dynamic socio-political landscape of the country, as the Constitution adapts to contemporary needs and demographics.
Chapter doubts & questions for Central Government - General Knowledge for NDA 2025 is part of NDA exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the NDA exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for NDA 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Central Government - General Knowledge for NDA in English & Hindi are available as part of NDA exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for NDA Exam by signing up for free.
General Knowledge for NDA
183 videos|262 docs|61 tests
|
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up
within 7 days!
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup