All questions of The Interview for Class 12 Exam

An Interview is a supremely serviceable medium of communication

An interview is a supremely serviceable medium of communication because it serves multiple purposes and offers numerous benefits. It can be seen as a noble medium of interaction and introspection, allowing individuals to connect, exchange ideas, and learn from each other. Let's explore the reasons why an interview is considered a valuable communication tool.

Effective Communication:
- Interviews provide a structured platform for effective communication. The interviewer and interviewee engage in a dialogue, allowing them to convey thoughts, ideas, and information clearly and concisely.
- Through well-crafted questions and active listening, interviews enable the exchange of meaningful and relevant information, promoting understanding and comprehension between the parties involved.

Information Gathering:
- An interview allows for the collection of accurate and comprehensive information. By asking targeted questions, interviewers can gather insights, opinions, and experiences from the interviewee, providing valuable data for research, journalism, or decision-making processes.
- This information can be used to create informative articles, reports, or studies, benefiting a wide range of industries and society as a whole.

Knowledge Sharing:
- Interviews provide a platform for experts, professionals, or individuals with unique experiences to share their knowledge. This sharing of expertise can be instrumental in educating and enlightening others.
- Through interviews, valuable insights, perspectives, and lessons learned can be disseminated, contributing to personal growth, professional development, and the advancement of various fields.

Introspection and Self-Reflection:
- Interviews can be a powerful tool for introspection and self-reflection. They allow individuals to delve into their thoughts, experiences, and motivations, prompting them to analyze and articulate their own beliefs and values.
- By answering thought-provoking questions, interviewees can gain a deeper understanding of themselves, their goals, and their aspirations. This introspection can lead to personal growth, self-awareness, and the ability to make informed decisions.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, an interview is a supremely serviceable medium of communication because it facilitates effective communication, information gathering, knowledge sharing, and introspection. It serves as a noble platform for individuals to connect, exchange ideas, and learn from one another. Whether it is in journalism, research, or personal development, interviews play a vital role in fostering understanding, promoting growth, and advancing society.

Lewis Carroll was said to have a just horror of the interviewer and he never consented to be interviewed, Caroline, the wife of Rudyard Kipling said that an interview is vile, crime and all offence. No respectable person, would ask it, much less give it.

Umberto Eco says that he has philosophical interests which reflect in all his writings : fiction and non-fiction. In this way, he does the same thing, though he seems to pursue various activities : writing notes for newspapers, novels, teaching, writing essays, children’s books etc.

The American publisher thought that the novel The Name of the Rose won't sell in America because it was a country where nobody had seen a cathedral or studied Latin. The novel, however, sold two or three million copies in the U.S. Umberto Eco rightly pointed out that the success is a mystery.

Between 10 to 15 million copies of the novel have been sold. In a way it has reached only a small percentage of readers. This shows that readers do not want easy experiences. The novel deals with a period of medieval history.

Umberto Eco, an Italian author and philosopher, is known for his significant contributions to literature. He has written numerous novels throughout his career, and the correct answer is option 'D', which states that he has written 5 novels.

Below is a detailed explanation of Umberto Eco's novels:

1. The Name of the Rose:
Published in 1980, "The Name of the Rose" is Umberto Eco's most famous novel. It is a historical mystery set in an Italian monastery in the 14th century. The story revolves around a Franciscan friar who investigates a series of mysterious deaths in the monastery.

2. Foucault's Pendulum:
Released in 1988, "Foucault's Pendulum" is a complex and intellectual novel that explores various conspiracy theories. It follows the journey of three editors who create a fictional conspiracy theory that eventually spirals out of control.

3. The Island of the Day Before:
Published in 1994, "The Island of the Day Before" is a philosophical and historical novel. It tells the story of a 17th-century Italian nobleman who becomes stranded on an island just outside the international date line.

4. Baudolino:
Released in 2000, "Baudolino" is a historical novel set in the 12th century. It follows the adventures of Baudolino, a young man who becomes involved in various historical events and encounters famous figures such as Frederick Barbarossa.

5. The Prague Cemetery:
Published in 2010, "The Prague Cemetery" is a dark and satirical novel that explores themes of conspiracy, forgery, and anti-Semitism. It follows the story of Simone Simonini, a forger who becomes involved in various historical events leading up to the creation of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

In conclusion, Umberto Eco has written a total of 5 novels, each showcasing his unique style and intellectual depth. These novels have garnered critical acclaim and have solidified Eco's position as one of the most influential writers of his time.

Regarding the conduction of an interview, some believe that in its highest forms, the interview is a valuable source of truth. In practice, it is nothing but a simple art. It is like stealing one’s soul. People hate the interview and call it as an unwarranted intrusion into their lives.

There is no one reason for the huge success of the novel “The Name of the Rose’. Umberto Eco himself calls its success a mystery. It is possible that this detective story that delved into metaphysics, theology and medieval history, interested the readers because the time in which it was written was most appropriate, neither a decade earlier nor a decade later.

Umberto Eco has manDenis Brain has appropriately said that almost everything reaches us through one man asking questions of another. Hence the interviewer holds a position of unprecedented power and influence. Every famous person has a right to his or her privacy. Interviewers sometimes embarrass celebrities with very personal questions.y philosophical interests. He pursues them through his academic works and novels. Even his children’ works are about non-violence and peace. They are the same bunch of ethical and philosophical interests. Eco wrote more than 40 scholarly works on non-fiction. Eco considers himself ‘a university professor who writes novels (only) on Sundays’. He prefers to be called an academician.

Umberto Eco firstly considered himself as an academic scholar because he was a professor and wrote many academic texts while he wrote his first novel at the age of 50 accidently.

Eco's academic writing style was distinctive and special because of his realistic narrative style with trial and errors.

1. Realistic Narrative Style:
Eco's academic writing style was characterized by a realistic narrative approach. He often presented his arguments and ideas in a narrative form, using examples, anecdotes, and real-life situations to illustrate his points. This made his writing style engaging and relatable to readers.

2. Trial and Error:
Another distinctive feature of Eco's writing style was his willingness to explore different ideas and perspectives through a process of trial and error. He was not afraid to present multiple viewpoints or consider alternative interpretations of a topic. This approach gave his writing a sense of intellectual curiosity and open-mindedness.

3. Attention to Detail:
Eco's writing style also stood out because of his meticulous attention to detail. He was known for his extensive research and comprehensive analysis of various subjects. His writing was rich in references, citations, and evidence, which added depth and credibility to his arguments.

4. Clarity and Precision:
Although Eco's writing style was complex and scholarly, he maintained clarity and precision in his language. He avoided unnecessary jargon or obscure terminology, making his ideas accessible to a wide range of readers. His writing was characterized by logical reasoning and clear explanations, ensuring that readers could follow his arguments easily.

5. Interdisciplinary Approach:
Eco's academic writing style was interdisciplinary in nature. He drew insights and ideas from various fields such as semiotics, philosophy, literature, and cultural studies. This interdisciplinary approach enriched his writing, allowing him to make connections and offer unique perspectives on complex topics.

In conclusion, Eco's academic writing style was distinctive due to his realistic narrative style with trial and errors. His ability to present complex ideas in a relatable and engaging manner, combined with meticulous attention to detail and clarity of language, made his writing highly influential and respected in academic circles.

Some primitive cultures believed that photographing a person is no less than stealing his/her soul out of the body and rendering him incomplete and slighted.

There are several celebrities mentioned in this chapter like Rudyard Kipling, V.S. Naipaul, H.G. Wells, Saul Bellow and etc. who dislike interviews very strongly. They never became ready to be interviewed. Most of them considered interviews as an unwarranted intrusion into their lives. They did not want to reveal the secrets of their personal lives.

They want to be challenged,” he told the Guardian in 2011. While his first novel was not published until 1980, Eco said he had always had a “narrative impulse” and began writing stories at the age of 10 or 12. Eco's first book published at the age of 22.

Umberto Eco prefers himself to be called an academician rather than a novelist. He wrote more than 40 philosophical writings against just five novels. He started writing novels just by accident and that too at a late age of 50. Modesty and honesty are the signs of a great writer like Eco. Mukund Padmanabhan asks the reason behind the huge success of ‘The Name of the Rose’. Umberto honestly replies that the success of this novel is a mystery even to him. Perhaps, he wrote it at an appropriate time. Had it been written 10 years before or after, perhaps it wouldn’t have been such a huge success.

Eco replies that just like the universe has empty spaces, our lives too, have a lot of empty spaces or 'interstices', as he calls them. Whenever he has a few moments to spare in between two different tasks, instead of wasting them, he uses the time to write.

He write the novels on sunday because he was free on that day. He think very much free on that day.

Umberto Eco has many philosophical interests. He pursues them through his academic works and novels. Even his children’ works are about non-violence and peace. They are the same bunch of ethical and philosophical interests. Eco wrote more than 40 scholarly works on non-fiction. Eco considers himself ‘a university professor who writes novels (only) on Sundays’. He prefers to be called an academician.

Many celebrities consider the interview ‘an unwarranted intrusion’ in their lives. But it has become a commonplace feature of journalism. It is a great serviceable medium of communication. We get the most vivid impressions of our contemporaries only through interviews. Everything reaches us in the simplest and true form when one asks questions of another.

Umberto Eco’s famous novel ‘The Name of the Rose’ is a very ‘serious novel’ But it enjoyed a mass audience. The interviewer wants to know the reason of its huge success. Even journalists and publishers are puzzled. People like what is served to them. If they are given to read even serious novels, they will read them. They accepted and digested a serious novel like ‘The Name of the Rose’. Its ‘timing’ was perfect. About 10 to 15 million copies of the novel were sold.

The novel "The Name of The Rose" by Umberto Eco achieved immense success due to a combination of several factors. These factors include its mystic elements, the incorporation of metaphysics and medieval history, and the unique blend of detective style and theology.

1. Mystic Elements:
The inclusion of mystic elements in the novel captivated readers and added an air of intrigue. The story is set in a monastery during the Middle Ages, where mysterious deaths occur. The presence of mysticism and the unknown creates an aura of suspense and engages the readers throughout the narrative.

2. Metaphysics and Medieval History:
"The Name of The Rose" delves into metaphysics and explores philosophical concepts such as semiotics, hermeneutics, and the nature of truth. The novel also provides a rich portrayal of the medieval period, depicting the social, cultural, and religious aspects of that time. This combination of metaphysical exploration and historical context appeals to readers interested in intellectual and historical subjects.

3. Detective Style:
The novel adopts a detective-style narrative, with the protagonist, William of Baskerville, tasked with solving a series of mysterious deaths in the abbey. This detective framework engages readers who enjoy suspenseful, investigative plots. The inclusion of clues, red herrings, and an unraveling of the truth keeps readers engaged and eager to uncover the secrets of the story.

4. Theology:
The novel intertwines theology with the detective plot, creating a unique and thought-provoking reading experience. It explores theological debates, religious conflicts, and the power struggles within the Church during the Middle Ages. The inclusion of theological themes adds depth and complexity to the storyline, appealing to readers interested in religious and philosophical discussions.

In conclusion, the huge success of "The Name of The Rose" can be attributed to the combination of its mystic elements, incorporation of metaphysics and medieval history, and the unique blend of detective style and theology. This multifaceted approach appeals to readers with diverse interests, creating a captivating and intellectually stimulating reading experience.

Umberto Eco feels elevated on calling him a professor. People think that he is doing many things but he concludes of doing himself the same thing. It is because that Umberto Eco had some philosophical interest which he followed in his novels and other academic work. His children books are based on peace and non-violence. There is a touch of philosophical and ethical interest as well.

Lewis Carroll was said to have a just horror of the interviewer and he never consented to be interviewed, Caroline, the wife of Rudyard Kipling said that an interview is vile, crime and all offence. No respectable person, would ask it, much less give it.

Umberto shares a secret with the interviewer. He thinks that if we eliminate the empty spaces from the universe, the world will shrink. It will become as big as a fist. Similarly, we have a lot of empty spaces or ‘interstices’ in our lives. He works in these spaces and uses them to his advantage.

Umberto Eco was essentially an academician who pursued his scholarly pursuits through academic writings. He wrote about forty non¬fictions and as he himself says, ‘he became a novelist by accident’. That was the reason he started writing novels at the age of almost fifty. Eco considers himself ‘a university professor who writes novels (only) on Sundays’. He is not even very sure about any one single reason for the huge success of his novel ‘The Name of the Rose’. He feels perhaps the timing of the novel’s publication was the most important factor of its success. The fact that at one level it appears to be a detective yarn but also delves into metaphysics, theology and medieval history also adds to its appeal. Though the novel is quite a heavy reading experience, it attracted a mass audience and made Eco popular more as a novelist rather than an academic scholar.

The Interview is an excerpt from Christopher's introduction to The Penguin Book of Interviews, which is a book of interviews compiled by Christopher Silvester.

In modern times, the chief source of information on personalities is the interviewer, who, through his power and influence, gathers information and provides us with the best possible information on the interviewees.

V.S. Naipaul vehemently condemns the cause of the interview. He believes that it is more than losing something from our body. He says that through interviews many would lose a part of our self. In reality, it is horrific for the interviewing candidate. This is the cause why people refuse to give their consent for an interview.

There are several celebrities mentioned in this chapter like Rudyard Kipling, V.S. Naipaul, H.G. Wells, Saul Bellow and etc. who dislike interviews very strongly. They never became ready to be interviewed. Most of them considered interviews as an unwarranted intrusion into their lives. They did not want to reveal the secrets of their personal lives.

Most of the celebrity writers shun interviews as they feel that interviews leave a disparaging effect on their personalities. They consider them as an encroachment on their privacy. Writers like V.S. Naipaul feel they are being wounded by interviews and thus losing a part of themselves.

Interview is considered as a reliable source of truth. Contemporaries and their success can be read through the interviews. A very important part of journalism is interview now a days.

Umberto Eco points out towards empty space in this universe. According to him if the empty space is eliminated from the universe, and as well as from the atoms, this universe will turn as big as our fist. In the same way, our lives are full of empty spaces. Umberto Eco calls them interstices. Eco says: “ Suppose you are coming over to my place on the third floor. You are in an elevator from the first to third floor and I am waiting for you. This is an interstice.”

Author of the Lesson ‘The Interview’
The author of the lesson ‘The Interview’ is Christopher Silvester (1959).

Explanation:
The lesson 'The Interview' is a part of the English textbook for Class 12. The author of this lesson is Christopher Silvester (1959). Let's delve into more details about the author and his works.

About Christopher Silvester:
- Christopher Silvester is a British author and journalist born in 1959.
- He has written several books and articles on various subjects, including literature, politics, and travel.
- Silvester's works have been published in reputable newspapers and magazines such as The Guardian, The Independent, and The Spectator.
- He has also authored books like 'The Penguin Book of Interviews' and 'Christopher Silvester's Guide to the London Literary World'.
- Silvester is known for his expertise in conducting interviews and his ability to capture the essence of the interviewees' personalities and experiences.

Importance of ‘The Interview’ Lesson:
- 'The Interview' is a lesson that focuses on the art of interviewing and its significance in the field of journalism.
- It provides insights into the techniques, challenges, and ethical considerations involved in conducting interviews.
- The lesson presents various interview scenarios and analyzes the different approaches taken by journalists.
- It also explores the impact of interviews on interviewees and the responsibility of the interviewer to portray their subjects accurately and fairly.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, Christopher Silvester (1959) is the author of the lesson 'The Interview'. His expertise in conducting interviews and his extensive writing experience contribute to the lesson's significance in understanding the art of interviewing in journalism.

In his interview with Mukand Padmanabhan, Umberto Eco points out that he is a university professor who writes novels on Sundays. Though he readily participates in academic conferences but he has no interest to attend to the meetings of Pen Clubs and the writers. He is very much clear about himself and identifies himself with the academic community. One can estimate that Eco is a modest cooperative and firm in his convictions. He does not call himself a successful novelist. Through his interview with Mukund we get aspects of his writings, style and ideas. Even then most of the people take him to be a novelist because of the huge success of his novel “The Name of the Rose” yet he remains committed to his regular professional academic work. In his novels for children one can find non-violence and peace.

Introduction:
Most celebrity writers despise being interviewed because of the unwarranted intrusion in their life. This intrusion often leads to their privacy being hurt. This answer will explain in detail why being interviewed is despised by celebrity writers.

Unwanted Intrusion:
When celebrities become writers, they are often interviewed by journalists who want to know more about their personal lives and experiences. These interviews can delve into personal and sensitive topics that the celebrities may not be comfortable discussing publicly. The intrusion into their personal space can be overwhelming and invasive, making them despise the entire interview process.

Limited Control over Narrative:
During interviews, celebrities may find themselves at the mercy of the journalist's agenda. They often have limited control over the narrative that is being presented to the public. Journalists have the power to shape the story and emphasize certain aspects while downplaying or omitting others. This lack of control can be frustrating for celebrity writers who may feel misrepresented or misunderstood.

Pervasive Public Scrutiny:
Celebrity writers already face a significant amount of public scrutiny due to their fame. Being interviewed further exposes them to judgment and criticism from the public. The fear of being misquoted or having their words taken out of context adds to their apprehension towards interviews. The constant scrutiny can be mentally and emotionally exhausting, leading to a disdain for being interviewed.

Privacy Concerns:
Privacy is a major concern for celebrity writers. Being in the public eye already means that aspects of their personal lives are often exposed. Interviews can further infringe upon their privacy as journalists dig for sensational or intimate details. Celebrity writers value their privacy and may despise interviews because they feel it violates their right to keep certain aspects of their lives private.

Maintaining Authenticity:
Celebrity writers may also despise interviews because they feel it hinders their ability to maintain authenticity. The pressure to be interesting or captivating during interviews can lead to a sense of performance rather than genuine expression. This can be frustrating for writers who value sincerity in their work and prefer to let their writing speak for itself.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, most celebrity writers despise being interviewed due to the unwanted intrusion in their life and the subsequent hurt to their privacy. The lack of control over the narrative, pervasive public scrutiny, and concerns about maintaining authenticity further contribute to their disdain for interviews.

The interview held between Eco and Padamnabhan reveals several facts about Padamnabhan's career and interests. Let's go through each option and see which facts are being showcased in the interview.

a) He takes pride in being an academician, a university Professor first:
In the interview, Padamnabhan mentions that he has been a professor for many years and still teaches at the university. He emphasizes the importance of being an academician and mentions that he takes pride in his profession. This indicates that being an academician and a university professor is his primary focus and priority.

b) Being a novelist is a secondary thing for him:
Padamnabhan mentions that writing novels is something he does in his free time. It is not his main profession or source of income. This suggests that being a novelist is a secondary pursuit for him, and his primary focus is on his academic career.

c) He uses his free time for writing novels:
During the interview, Padamnabhan mentions that he writes novels in his spare time. He explains that he enjoys writing and finds it to be a creative outlet. This indicates that he utilizes his free time for writing novels, further highlighting that it is not his primary occupation.

d) All these:
Based on the information provided in the interview, all of the above facts are being showcased. Padamnabhan takes pride in being an academician and a university professor first, and being a novelist is a secondary pursuit for him. He uses his free time for writing novels as a creative outlet. Therefore, option D is the correct answer as it encompasses all the facts mentioned in the interview.

The expression 'thumbprints on his windpipe' means an aggressive invasion into the private views and utterances of the interviewee, ft is also suggestive of answers being forced out of the person who is being interviewed.

Interview is a medium of interaction and introspection. It is a structured conversation between two or more people with the purpose of gathering information, sharing ideas, and evaluating the qualifications of the interviewee.

Importance of Interviews:
- Interaction: Interviews allow for direct interaction between the interviewer and interviewee, enabling a deeper understanding of the individual's thoughts, experiences, and qualifications.
- Information Gathering: Interviews are a valuable tool for gathering information, insights, and perspectives on a particular topic or individual.
- Assessment: Interviews help assess the skills, knowledge, and suitability of a candidate for a job, program, or any other opportunity.
- Introspection: Interviews also provide an opportunity for self-reflection and introspection, as individuals may be asked to reflect on their experiences, strengths, weaknesses, and goals.

Types of Interviews:
- Job Interviews: Conducted by employers to evaluate a candidate's qualifications for a specific job role.
- Journalistic Interviews: Conducted by journalists to gather information for news articles, reports, or broadcasts.
- Research Interviews: Conducted by researchers to gather data for studies, surveys, or academic research.
- Panel Interviews: Involving multiple interviewers to assess a candidate from different perspectives.
- Virtual Interviews: Conducted remotely using video conferencing tools, especially in situations where in-person meetings are not feasible.
In conclusion, interviews serve as a crucial medium for communication, information exchange, evaluation, and self-reflection. It is a valuable tool in various fields such as recruitment, journalism, research, and personal development.

Many celebrities consider the interview ‘an unwarranted intrusion’ in their lives. But it has become a commonplace feature of journalism. It is a great serviceable medium of communication. We get the most vivid impressions of our contemporaries only through interviews. Everything reaches us in the simplest and true form when one asks questions of another.

Charles Dodgson, a mathematician at Christ Church, Oxford, first told his surreal story to the daughters of dean Henry Liddell as they rowed down the Thames. After the boating trip, 10-year-old Alice Liddell badgered Dodgson to write it down and Alice in Wonderland - under the pseudonym Lewis Carroll - was born.