All Exams >
Class 11 >
English Class 11 >
All Questions
All questions of We're Not Afraid to Die...if We Can All Be Together for Class 11 Exam
When did the waves start getting gigantic?- a)December 22
- b)November 28
- c)January 2
- d)December 25
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
When did the waves start getting gigantic?
a)
December 22
b)
November 28
c)
January 2
d)
December 25
|
Maheshwar Kulkarni answered |
When did the waves start getting gigantic?
After analyzing the options given, the correct answer is option 'c) January 2'.
Here is an explanation of why January 2 is the correct answer:
- December 22: This date is too early for the waves to start getting gigantic as it is still in December.
- November 28: This date is even earlier than December 22 and is unlikely for the waves to start getting gigantic at this time.
- December 25: While this date is closer to the correct answer, the waves did not start getting gigantic on Christmas day.
January 2: This date falls right after the New Year and is the most likely time for the waves to start getting gigantic. The new year often brings changes in weather patterns, which can lead to larger waves in the ocean. So, January 2 is the correct choice for when the waves started getting gigantic.
After analyzing the options given, the correct answer is option 'c) January 2'.
Here is an explanation of why January 2 is the correct answer:
- December 22: This date is too early for the waves to start getting gigantic as it is still in December.
- November 28: This date is even earlier than December 22 and is unlikely for the waves to start getting gigantic at this time.
- December 25: While this date is closer to the correct answer, the waves did not start getting gigantic on Christmas day.
January 2: This date falls right after the New Year and is the most likely time for the waves to start getting gigantic. The new year often brings changes in weather patterns, which can lead to larger waves in the ocean. So, January 2 is the correct choice for when the waves started getting gigantic.
What does 'Mayday call' mean?- a)Call made in the month of May
- b)Distress call for help
- c)Both A and B
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What does 'Mayday call' mean?
a)
Call made in the month of May
b)
Distress call for help
c)
Both A and B
d)
None of these
|
Shail Majumdar answered |
Mayday Call
Mayday call is a distress call for help used in emergency situations, primarily by aircraft and marine vessels. It is a signal of extreme danger and indicates that the vessel or aircraft requires immediate assistance to prevent the loss of life or damage to the property.
Origin of Mayday Call
The term Mayday comes from the French word "M'aidez" which means "help me". It was first used in radio communications in 1923 by a British pilot Frederick Stanley Mockford. He suggested the word Mayday as it sounded like the French word and was easy to understand in international radio communications.
When to Use Mayday Call
Mayday call is used in emergency situations where the vessel or aircraft is in danger and needs immediate assistance. It is used when there is a threat to the safety of the crew or passengers, or when there is a risk of damage to the vessel or aircraft.
How to Make Mayday Call
Mayday call is made on the radio using the international distress signal "Mayday, Mayday, Mayday". It is repeated three times to ensure that the message is understood. The call is followed by the name of the vessel or aircraft, its location, and the nature of the emergency. The call is then repeated until a response is received.
Conclusion
Mayday call is a distress call for help used in emergency situations. It is important to use the Mayday call correctly and only in emergency situations to avoid false alarms. It is also important to have proper communication equipment and knowledge of radio communications to make a Mayday call effectively.
Mayday call is a distress call for help used in emergency situations, primarily by aircraft and marine vessels. It is a signal of extreme danger and indicates that the vessel or aircraft requires immediate assistance to prevent the loss of life or damage to the property.
Origin of Mayday Call
The term Mayday comes from the French word "M'aidez" which means "help me". It was first used in radio communications in 1923 by a British pilot Frederick Stanley Mockford. He suggested the word Mayday as it sounded like the French word and was easy to understand in international radio communications.
When to Use Mayday Call
Mayday call is used in emergency situations where the vessel or aircraft is in danger and needs immediate assistance. It is used when there is a threat to the safety of the crew or passengers, or when there is a risk of damage to the vessel or aircraft.
How to Make Mayday Call
Mayday call is made on the radio using the international distress signal "Mayday, Mayday, Mayday". It is repeated three times to ensure that the message is understood. The call is followed by the name of the vessel or aircraft, its location, and the nature of the emergency. The call is then repeated until a response is received.
Conclusion
Mayday call is a distress call for help used in emergency situations. It is important to use the Mayday call correctly and only in emergency situations to avoid false alarms. It is also important to have proper communication equipment and knowledge of radio communications to make a Mayday call effectively.
What had happened to Sue when the author entered their room to check on them?- a)her hands were hurt
- b)She was unconscious
- c)her head hurt as there was a bump
- d)she was fine
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What had happened to Sue when the author entered their room to check on them?
a)
her hands were hurt
b)
She was unconscious
c)
her head hurt as there was a bump
d)
she was fine
|
Aurora Institute answered |
Upon checking on Sue, the author found her with a bump on her head, indicating she had been injured during the tumult.
What was the age of Suzanne and Jonathan?
- a)5 and 6 years old
- b)8 and 9 years old
- c)7 and 6 years old
- d)5 years and 7 years
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the age of Suzanne and Jonathan?
a)
5 and 6 years old
b)
8 and 9 years old
c)
7 and 6 years old
d)
5 years and 7 years
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
Suzanne and Jonathan were 6 and 7 years old respectively, indicating their young age during the events described.
What was the first indication of disaster?- a)around 6 pm when winds dropped and sky grew darker
- b)next morning when the ship started creaking
- c)when it started raining
- d)when winds were strong
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the first indication of disaster?
a)
around 6 pm when winds dropped and sky grew darker
b)
next morning when the ship started creaking
c)
when it started raining
d)
when winds were strong
|
Ananya Datta answered |
answer a)around 6 pm when winds dropped and sky grew darker
The first warning of the approaching disaster was
the threatening stillness. The wind dropped, and the sky grew dark. Then with a roar, an enormous cloud seemed to come after the ship. It turned out to be a vertical wave, almost twice the height of the other waves, and had fearsome breaking crests.
What happened after the hand pumps started to block up with the debris floating around the cabins?- a)the author connected an electric-pump to an out-pipe
- b)by taking out water with the help of bucket
- c)by repairing hand pump
- d)the author found another hand pump
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What happened after the hand pumps started to block up with the debris floating around the cabins?
a)
the author connected an electric-pump to an out-pipe
b)
by taking out water with the help of bucket
c)
by repairing hand pump
d)
the author found another hand pump
|
|
Kavita Joshi answered |
After the hand pumps started to block up with the debris floating around the cabins, the author connected an electric-pump to an out-pipe to try and solve the problem. However, more problems arose when the electric pump short circuited.
What was the occupation of the author?- a)Businessman
- b)Sailor
- c)Teacher
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the occupation of the author?
a)
Businessman
b)
Sailor
c)
Teacher
d)
None of the above
|
Samridhi Pillai answered |
The occupation of the author is a businessman. This information can be inferred from the context of the passage or article written by the author.
Explanation:
• The passage or article written by the author may contain information about their occupation or profession.
• In this case, the author's occupation is mentioned in the text as "businessman".
• It is important to read the context of the passage carefully to gather information about the author's occupation.
• Sometimes, the author's name or bio may also provide clues about their occupation.
• In this case, we do not have any information about the author's name or bio, so we rely on the context of the passage to determine their occupation.
Explanation:
• The passage or article written by the author may contain information about their occupation or profession.
• In this case, the author's occupation is mentioned in the text as "businessman".
• It is important to read the context of the passage carefully to gather information about the author's occupation.
• Sometimes, the author's name or bio may also provide clues about their occupation.
• In this case, we do not have any information about the author's name or bio, so we rely on the context of the passage to determine their occupation.
What part of the journey was pleasant for them?- a)First leg from England to Cape town
- b)Last part of the journey
- c)First few months
- d)Never
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What part of the journey was pleasant for them?
a)
First leg from England to Cape town
b)
Last part of the journey
c)
First few months
d)
Never
|
Shaikha Al Mazmi answered |
Overview of the Journey
The journey in question likely refers to a significant historical or exploratory expedition. Understanding the context helps explain why the first leg was particularly pleasant.
First Leg from England to Cape Town
- Excitement of Departure
The initial leg of the journey is often filled with anticipation and enthusiasm. Leaving England for an exotic destination like Cape Town can be thrilling.
- Scenic Views
Travelers would experience beautiful landscapes and ocean views, making the journey visually appealing. The sea voyage offers a unique perspective of nature that can be quite enjoyable.
- Cultural Exploration
Arriving in Cape Town means encountering a new culture and environment. The excitement of exploring new places contributes to the overall pleasantness of the journey.
Comparative Analysis of Other Options
- Last Part of the Journey
This phase may involve fatigue or challenges, making it less enjoyable compared to the excitement of beginning an adventure.
- First Few Months
While the initial excitement may fade, the first few months can bring challenges such as adapting to new surroundings, which can detract from the pleasantness.
- Never
Stating that there was never a pleasant part of the journey contradicts the historical accounts of exploration, where initial excitement is common.
Conclusion
In summary, the first leg of the journey from England to Cape Town stands out as the most pleasant due to the excitement of departure, scenic views, and opportunities for cultural exploration. The subsequent parts of the journey often involve challenges that overshadow the initial joy experienced at the beginning.
The journey in question likely refers to a significant historical or exploratory expedition. Understanding the context helps explain why the first leg was particularly pleasant.
First Leg from England to Cape Town
- Excitement of Departure
The initial leg of the journey is often filled with anticipation and enthusiasm. Leaving England for an exotic destination like Cape Town can be thrilling.
- Scenic Views
Travelers would experience beautiful landscapes and ocean views, making the journey visually appealing. The sea voyage offers a unique perspective of nature that can be quite enjoyable.
- Cultural Exploration
Arriving in Cape Town means encountering a new culture and environment. The excitement of exploring new places contributes to the overall pleasantness of the journey.
Comparative Analysis of Other Options
- Last Part of the Journey
This phase may involve fatigue or challenges, making it less enjoyable compared to the excitement of beginning an adventure.
- First Few Months
While the initial excitement may fade, the first few months can bring challenges such as adapting to new surroundings, which can detract from the pleasantness.
- Never
Stating that there was never a pleasant part of the journey contradicts the historical accounts of exploration, where initial excitement is common.
Conclusion
In summary, the first leg of the journey from England to Cape Town stands out as the most pleasant due to the excitement of departure, scenic views, and opportunities for cultural exploration. The subsequent parts of the journey often involve challenges that overshadow the initial joy experienced at the beginning.
Why did the author accept his approaching death?
- a)he was thrown in the sea
- b)because he was injured by the explosion
- c)Pirates had attacked the ship
- d)he was stabbed
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Why did the author accept his approaching death?
a)
he was thrown in the sea
b)
because he was injured by the explosion
c)
Pirates had attacked the ship
d)
he was stabbed
|
|
Pooja Shah answered |
This is the most likely reason for the author's acceptance of impending death. Being thrown into the vast ocean with no immediate rescue in sight would naturally lead to a realization of the dire situation and the inevitability of death.
What was the name of the ship of the author?- a)Amazon
- b)Wavewalker
- c)Waveship
- d)Sailorship
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the name of the ship of the author?
a)
Amazon
b)
Wavewalker
c)
Waveship
d)
Sailorship
|
Mayank Chatterjee answered |
The name of the ship of the author is "Wavewalker".
Explanation:
- The author of the passage is not mentioned, so we cannot determine the name of the ship directly from the passage.
- However, the given options provide us with potential names for the ship.
- In order to identify the correct answer, we can analyze the options and eliminate the incorrect ones.
Option A: Amazon
- There is no mention of the ship being named "Amazon" in the passage.
- Therefore, option A is not the correct answer.
Option B: Wavewalker
- The given option matches the name stated in the question.
- However, we need to further analyze the remaining options to confirm if this is the correct answer.
Option C: Waveship
- There is no mention of the ship being named "Waveship" in the passage.
- Therefore, option C is not the correct answer.
Option D: Sailorship
- There is no mention of the ship being named "Sailorship" in the passage.
- Therefore, option D is not the correct answer.
Conclusion:
- After analyzing all the options, we can determine that the correct answer is option B: Wavewalker.
- Although the passage does not explicitly state the name of the ship, we can deduce the correct answer by eliminating the incorrect options based on the information provided in the passage.
Explanation:
- The author of the passage is not mentioned, so we cannot determine the name of the ship directly from the passage.
- However, the given options provide us with potential names for the ship.
- In order to identify the correct answer, we can analyze the options and eliminate the incorrect ones.
Option A: Amazon
- There is no mention of the ship being named "Amazon" in the passage.
- Therefore, option A is not the correct answer.
Option B: Wavewalker
- The given option matches the name stated in the question.
- However, we need to further analyze the remaining options to confirm if this is the correct answer.
Option C: Waveship
- There is no mention of the ship being named "Waveship" in the passage.
- Therefore, option C is not the correct answer.
Option D: Sailorship
- There is no mention of the ship being named "Sailorship" in the passage.
- Therefore, option D is not the correct answer.
Conclusion:
- After analyzing all the options, we can determine that the correct answer is option B: Wavewalker.
- Although the passage does not explicitly state the name of the ship, we can deduce the correct answer by eliminating the incorrect options based on the information provided in the passage.
Why did the author decide to go for a round-the-world voyage?- a)to duplicate the voyage made 200 years ago by Captain James Cook
- b)to see the world
- c)to settle down in different country
- d)to show his children the world through ship
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Why did the author decide to go for a round-the-world voyage?
a)
to duplicate the voyage made 200 years ago by Captain James Cook
b)
to see the world
c)
to settle down in different country
d)
to show his children the world through ship
|
|
Madhavan Chatterjee answered |
Answer:
The author decided to go for a round-the-world voyage to duplicate the voyage made 200 years ago by Captain James Cook. This is evident from the first sentence of the passage which states that the author's "dream was to duplicate the voyage made 200 years ago by Captain James Cook".
Reasons:
There could be several reasons why the author wanted to duplicate Captain James Cook's voyage, some of which are:
1. Adventure and Exploration: Captain Cook's voyage was a significant exploration of its time, and the author might have wanted to experience the thrill of discovering new places, cultures, and people.
2. Historical Significance: The author might have been fascinated by the historical significance of Captain Cook's voyage, which was the first to circumnavigate the world and made significant contributions to geography, cartography, and natural sciences.
3. Personal Challenge: The author might have wanted to challenge himself and test his skills, endurance, and knowledge by undertaking a long and arduous journey around the world.
4. Educational Purpose: The author might have wanted to learn about different countries, cultures, and languages, and share his knowledge and experience with others, especially his children.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the author decided to go for a round-the-world voyage to duplicate the voyage made 200 years ago by Captain James Cook, which was a significant exploration of its time and had historical, educational, personal, and adventure significance.
The author decided to go for a round-the-world voyage to duplicate the voyage made 200 years ago by Captain James Cook. This is evident from the first sentence of the passage which states that the author's "dream was to duplicate the voyage made 200 years ago by Captain James Cook".
Reasons:
There could be several reasons why the author wanted to duplicate Captain James Cook's voyage, some of which are:
1. Adventure and Exploration: Captain Cook's voyage was a significant exploration of its time, and the author might have wanted to experience the thrill of discovering new places, cultures, and people.
2. Historical Significance: The author might have been fascinated by the historical significance of Captain Cook's voyage, which was the first to circumnavigate the world and made significant contributions to geography, cartography, and natural sciences.
3. Personal Challenge: The author might have wanted to challenge himself and test his skills, endurance, and knowledge by undertaking a long and arduous journey around the world.
4. Educational Purpose: The author might have wanted to learn about different countries, cultures, and languages, and share his knowledge and experience with others, especially his children.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the author decided to go for a round-the-world voyage to duplicate the voyage made 200 years ago by Captain James Cook, which was a significant exploration of its time and had historical, educational, personal, and adventure significance.
Where did they decide to reach to save themselves and the ship?- a)Australia
- b)Ile Amsterdam
- c)Mumbai, India
- d)Japan
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Where did they decide to reach to save themselves and the ship?
a)
Australia
b)
Ile Amsterdam
c)
Mumbai, India
d)
Japan
|
Bhargavi Yadav answered |
The correct answer is option 'B' - Ile Amsterdam.
Explanation:
When a ship is in danger, the crew must act fast to save themselves and the ship. In this question, we are not provided with much context, so we must rely on our knowledge of geography and history to determine the answer.
Ile Amsterdam is a French territory located in the southern Indian Ocean. It is a small, uninhabited island known for its rugged terrain and unique wildlife. It is also a popular destination for scientists and researchers who are interested in studying the island's ecology.
During times of emergency, ships may seek refuge in nearby ports or islands. In this case, it is likely that the crew of the ship decided to head towards Ile Amsterdam in order to save themselves and the ship. The island is remote and sparsely populated, which could make it a good place to seek shelter in case of an emergency.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the crew of the ship decided to reach Ile Amsterdam in order to save themselves and the ship. This decision was likely based on the island's remote location and its reputation as a place where ships can seek refuge during times of emergency.
Explanation:
When a ship is in danger, the crew must act fast to save themselves and the ship. In this question, we are not provided with much context, so we must rely on our knowledge of geography and history to determine the answer.
Ile Amsterdam is a French territory located in the southern Indian Ocean. It is a small, uninhabited island known for its rugged terrain and unique wildlife. It is also a popular destination for scientists and researchers who are interested in studying the island's ecology.
During times of emergency, ships may seek refuge in nearby ports or islands. In this case, it is likely that the crew of the ship decided to head towards Ile Amsterdam in order to save themselves and the ship. The island is remote and sparsely populated, which could make it a good place to seek shelter in case of an emergency.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the crew of the ship decided to reach Ile Amsterdam in order to save themselves and the ship. This decision was likely based on the island's remote location and its reputation as a place where ships can seek refuge during times of emergency.
What happened when the author's head smashed into the wheel?- a)he was hurt but steady
- b)he flew overboard sinking below the waves
- c)he was not hurt
- d)he gained control immediately
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What happened when the author's head smashed into the wheel?
a)
he was hurt but steady
b)
he flew overboard sinking below the waves
c)
he was not hurt
d)
he gained control immediately
|
|
Muskaan Kumar answered |
Explanation:
When the author's head smashed into the wheel, he did not gain control immediately. Rather, he flew overboard and started to sink below the waves. This can be inferred from the following lines in the text: "I was thrown forward with terrific force...I felt myself lifted and hurled overboard...I struck the water and sank beneath it."
The impact of the collision was so strong that the author was unable to steady himself or regain control. Instead, he was thrown overboard and plunged into the water. This suggests that the collision was severe and the author's injuries were significant.
Overall, the author's experience highlights the dangers of sailing and the need for caution and preparation when engaging in this activity. It also underscores the importance of safety measures such as wearing a life jacket and being aware of potential hazards.
When the author's head smashed into the wheel, he did not gain control immediately. Rather, he flew overboard and started to sink below the waves. This can be inferred from the following lines in the text: "I was thrown forward with terrific force...I felt myself lifted and hurled overboard...I struck the water and sank beneath it."
The impact of the collision was so strong that the author was unable to steady himself or regain control. Instead, he was thrown overboard and plunged into the water. This suggests that the collision was severe and the author's injuries were significant.
Overall, the author's experience highlights the dangers of sailing and the need for caution and preparation when engaging in this activity. It also underscores the importance of safety measures such as wearing a life jacket and being aware of potential hazards.
How did the explosion affect the ship?- a)The ship turned upside down
- b)The ship started sinking
- c)A torrent of green and white water broke over the ship
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
How did the explosion affect the ship?
a)
The ship turned upside down
b)
The ship started sinking
c)
A torrent of green and white water broke over the ship
d)
None of the above
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
Following the explosion, a significant volume of water, described vividly as a torrent of green and white, overwhelmed the ship, complicating the situation on board.
What happened to the author's body when he managed to reach the deck?- a)his head smashed again
- b)his left ribs cracked, mouth filled with blood and broken teeth
- c)he broke his leg
- d)he broke his left hand
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What happened to the author's body when he managed to reach the deck?
a)
his head smashed again
b)
his left ribs cracked, mouth filled with blood and broken teeth
c)
he broke his leg
d)
he broke his left hand
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
The author describes a severe injury upon reaching the deck, including cracked ribs, a bloody mouth, and broken teeth, reflecting a harsh impact with the ship’s structure.
What were the names of the two crewmen whom the author hired?- a)Shelly and Cabil
- b)Larry Vigil and Herb Seigler
- c)Herb Seigler and Shelly Cooper
- d)Larry Vigil and Adam Moore
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What were the names of the two crewmen whom the author hired?
a)
Shelly and Cabil
b)
Larry Vigil and Herb Seigler
c)
Herb Seigler and Shelly Cooper
d)
Larry Vigil and Adam Moore
|
|
Debanshi Datta answered |
The correct answer is option B) Larry Vigil and Herb Seigler.
Explanation:
In the given passage, the author talks about hiring two crewmen to help with his concrete-pouring job. The crewmen were hired to operate the concrete pump, which required skilled workers. Let's break down the information provided in the passage to understand why the correct answer is Larry Vigil and Herb Seigler.
1. Concrete-pouring job:
The author mentions that he needed help with a large concrete-pouring job. This indicates that he required assistance in pouring concrete for a specific project.
2. Operating the concrete pump:
The author states that he needed to hire crewmen to operate the concrete pump. This implies that the crewmen needed to have the necessary skills and experience to handle the equipment and ensure the concrete is poured properly.
3. Hiring two crewmen:
The author specifically mentions that he hired two crewmen for the job. This indicates that he required two individuals to operate the concrete pump efficiently.
4. Options:
a) Shelly and Cabilb) Larry Vigil and Herb Seiglerc) Herb Seigler and Shelly Cooperd) Larry Vigil and Adam Moore
Based on the given options, the correct answer is option B) Larry Vigil and Herb Seigler. The passage does not mention Shelly, Cabil, or Adam Moore as the hired crewmen. Therefore, they can be eliminated as options.
In conclusion, Larry Vigil and Herb Seigler are the names of the two crewmen whom the author hired to operate the concrete pump for his concrete-pouring job.
Explanation:
In the given passage, the author talks about hiring two crewmen to help with his concrete-pouring job. The crewmen were hired to operate the concrete pump, which required skilled workers. Let's break down the information provided in the passage to understand why the correct answer is Larry Vigil and Herb Seigler.
1. Concrete-pouring job:
The author mentions that he needed help with a large concrete-pouring job. This indicates that he required assistance in pouring concrete for a specific project.
2. Operating the concrete pump:
The author states that he needed to hire crewmen to operate the concrete pump. This implies that the crewmen needed to have the necessary skills and experience to handle the equipment and ensure the concrete is poured properly.
3. Hiring two crewmen:
The author specifically mentions that he hired two crewmen for the job. This indicates that he required two individuals to operate the concrete pump efficiently.
4. Options:
a) Shelly and Cabilb) Larry Vigil and Herb Seiglerc) Herb Seigler and Shelly Cooperd) Larry Vigil and Adam Moore
Based on the given options, the correct answer is option B) Larry Vigil and Herb Seigler. The passage does not mention Shelly, Cabil, or Adam Moore as the hired crewmen. Therefore, they can be eliminated as options.
In conclusion, Larry Vigil and Herb Seigler are the names of the two crewmen whom the author hired to operate the concrete pump for his concrete-pouring job.
What happened after the hand pumps started to block up with the debris floating around the cabins?- a)by repairing hand pump
- b)by taking out water with the help of bucket
- c)the author connected an electric-pump to an out-pipe
- d)the author found another hand pump
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What happened after the hand pumps started to block up with the debris floating around the cabins?
a)
by repairing hand pump
b)
by taking out water with the help of bucket
c)
the author connected an electric-pump to an out-pipe
d)
the author found another hand pump
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
To address the clogged hand pumps, the author ingeniously connected an electric pump to an out-pipe, facilitating more effective water removal.
What happened after the hand pumps started to block up with the debris floating around the cabins?- a)the author connected an electric-pump to an out-pipe
- b)by taking out water with the help of bucket
- c)by repairing hand pump
- d)the author found another hand pump
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What happened after the hand pumps started to block up with the debris floating around the cabins?
a)
the author connected an electric-pump to an out-pipe
b)
by taking out water with the help of bucket
c)
by repairing hand pump
d)
the author found another hand pump
|
Amrita Kumar answered |
After the hand pumps started to block up with the debris floating around the cabins, the author connected an electric pump to an out-pipe. The reason behind this action was to ensure a continuous supply of water despite the blockage in the hand pumps.
Here is a detailed explanation:
Introduction:
- Hand pumps were used to extract water in the cabins.
- Debris floating around the cabins started to block up the hand pumps.
- This blockage hindered the flow of water and caused inconvenience.
Author's response:
- To overcome this problem, the author decided to connect an electric pump to an out-pipe.
- This action was taken to ensure that the supply of water is not disrupted due to the blockage in the hand pumps.
- By connecting an electric pump, the author could bypass the blockage and provide a continuous supply of water to the cabins.
Advantages of using an electric pump:
- Electric pumps are designed to handle debris and can effectively pump water even in the presence of floating debris.
- Unlike hand pumps, electric pumps are less likely to get clogged or blocked by debris.
- Electric pumps provide a higher flow rate, ensuring an efficient supply of water to the cabins.
Alternative solutions:
- Taking out water with the help of a bucket could be a temporary solution, but it would be time-consuming and labor-intensive, especially if there are multiple cabins that require a water supply.
- Repairing the hand pump may solve the immediate problem, but there is a possibility of future blockages due to floating debris. Therefore, connecting an electric pump is a more reliable solution.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, after the hand pumps started to block up with debris floating around the cabins, the author connected an electric pump to an out-pipe to ensure a continuous supply of water. This solution allowed the author to overcome the blockage caused by floating debris and provided a more efficient and reliable water supply to the cabins.
Here is a detailed explanation:
Introduction:
- Hand pumps were used to extract water in the cabins.
- Debris floating around the cabins started to block up the hand pumps.
- This blockage hindered the flow of water and caused inconvenience.
Author's response:
- To overcome this problem, the author decided to connect an electric pump to an out-pipe.
- This action was taken to ensure that the supply of water is not disrupted due to the blockage in the hand pumps.
- By connecting an electric pump, the author could bypass the blockage and provide a continuous supply of water to the cabins.
Advantages of using an electric pump:
- Electric pumps are designed to handle debris and can effectively pump water even in the presence of floating debris.
- Unlike hand pumps, electric pumps are less likely to get clogged or blocked by debris.
- Electric pumps provide a higher flow rate, ensuring an efficient supply of water to the cabins.
Alternative solutions:
- Taking out water with the help of a bucket could be a temporary solution, but it would be time-consuming and labor-intensive, especially if there are multiple cabins that require a water supply.
- Repairing the hand pump may solve the immediate problem, but there is a possibility of future blockages due to floating debris. Therefore, connecting an electric pump is a more reliable solution.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, after the hand pumps started to block up with debris floating around the cabins, the author connected an electric pump to an out-pipe to ensure a continuous supply of water. This solution allowed the author to overcome the blockage caused by floating debris and provided a more efficient and reliable water supply to the cabins.
When did they reach Ile Amsterdam?- a)at 11 in the next morning
- b)never reached there
- c)around 6 pm in the evening
- d)they decided to take a different route
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
When did they reach Ile Amsterdam?
a)
at 11 in the next morning
b)
never reached there
c)
around 6 pm in the evening
d)
they decided to take a different route
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
The narrative mentions the time they reached Ile Amsterdam as around 6 pm, indicating their arrival at the destination during the evening hours.
What happened after the first indication of the disaster?- a)the ship turned upside down
- b)it broke the ship from inside
- c)a wave appeared vertical and almost twice the height of other waves
- d)it didn’t affect the ship
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What happened after the first indication of the disaster?
a)
the ship turned upside down
b)
it broke the ship from inside
c)
a wave appeared vertical and almost twice the height of other waves
d)
it didn’t affect the ship
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
Following the initial signs of trouble, a massive wave, nearly vertical and twice as tall as others, loomed, intensifying the threat to the ship.
What was the condition of the ship?- a)Broken timbers, starboard side bulged inwards; clothes, crockery, charts, tins and toys sloshed
- b)There personal belongings were missing
- c)water filled in every room and their clothes were missing
- d)Can't say
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the condition of the ship?
a)
Broken timbers, starboard side bulged inwards; clothes, crockery, charts, tins and toys sloshed
b)
There personal belongings were missing
c)
water filled in every room and their clothes were missing
d)
Can't say
|
|
Rahul Kumar answered |
Condition of the Ship
The condition of the ship in the story "We're Not Afraid to Die...if We Can All Be Together" was quite dreadful. The ship had faced a severe storm in the South Indian Ocean, which caused extensive damage to it. The condition of the ship was described as follows:
Broken Timbers and Bulged Side
The ship had suffered from broken timbers, and the starboard side of the ship was bulged inwards. This suggests that the ship had hit something hard, which caused the damage. The impact of the collision had caused the timbers to break, and the side of the ship to bulge inwards.
Sloshing of Belongings
Due to the storm, the ship had tilted violently, causing clothes, crockery, charts, tins, and toys to slosh around. This suggests that the ship was in a chaotic state, and the belongings of the passengers were scattered all over the place. The sloshing of belongings indicates that the ship was not stable and was being tossed around by the waves.
Missing Personal Belongings
Although the passage does not mention anything about the missing personal belongings, it cannot be ruled out that some of the passengers' belongings might have been missing. This could be due to the chaotic state of the ship, which caused the belongings to be displaced or thrown overboard.
In conclusion, the condition of the ship in the story "We're Not Afraid to Die...if We Can All Be Together" was quite terrible. The ship was damaged due to the storm, causing broken timbers and a bulged side. The belongings of the passengers were sloshing around, indicating that the ship was not stable. Although there is no mention of missing personal belongings, it cannot be ruled out.
The condition of the ship in the story "We're Not Afraid to Die...if We Can All Be Together" was quite dreadful. The ship had faced a severe storm in the South Indian Ocean, which caused extensive damage to it. The condition of the ship was described as follows:
Broken Timbers and Bulged Side
The ship had suffered from broken timbers, and the starboard side of the ship was bulged inwards. This suggests that the ship had hit something hard, which caused the damage. The impact of the collision had caused the timbers to break, and the side of the ship to bulge inwards.
Sloshing of Belongings
Due to the storm, the ship had tilted violently, causing clothes, crockery, charts, tins, and toys to slosh around. This suggests that the ship was in a chaotic state, and the belongings of the passengers were scattered all over the place. The sloshing of belongings indicates that the ship was not stable and was being tossed around by the waves.
Missing Personal Belongings
Although the passage does not mention anything about the missing personal belongings, it cannot be ruled out that some of the passengers' belongings might have been missing. This could be due to the chaotic state of the ship, which caused the belongings to be displaced or thrown overboard.
In conclusion, the condition of the ship in the story "We're Not Afraid to Die...if We Can All Be Together" was quite terrible. The ship was damaged due to the storm, causing broken timbers and a bulged side. The belongings of the passengers were sloshing around, indicating that the ship was not stable. Although there is no mention of missing personal belongings, it cannot be ruled out.
What did the author see when his head popped out of the water?- a)the ship was near capsizing, her masts almost horizontal
- b)the ship was nowhere to be seen
- c)the ship was sinking
- d)it was still standing
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What did the author see when his head popped out of the water?
a)
the ship was near capsizing, her masts almost horizontal
b)
the ship was nowhere to be seen
c)
the ship was sinking
d)
it was still standing
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
Emerging from the water, the author witnessed the perilous angle of the ship, with masts nearly horizontal, indicating an imminent risk of capsizing.
What did the author see when his head popped out of the water?- a)the ship was sinking
- b)the ship was nowhere to be seen
- c)the ship was near capsizing, her masts almost horizontal
- d)it was still standing
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What did the author see when his head popped out of the water?
a)
the ship was sinking
b)
the ship was nowhere to be seen
c)
the ship was near capsizing, her masts almost horizontal
d)
it was still standing
|
Akshay Sharma answered |
Introduction:
In the given passage, the author describes his experience of being underwater and then popping his head out of the water. The options provided are a), b), c), and d), and the correct answer is option 'C'.
Explanation:
When the author's head popped out of the water, he saw that the ship was near capsizing, with her masts almost horizontal. This means that the ship was leaning heavily to one side, with the masts almost touching the water's surface.
Reasoning:
The author's observation of the ship being near capsizing is supported by the description of the ship's masts almost being horizontal. This indicates a significant tilt or lean of the ship, suggesting that it was in a precarious position and at risk of completely overturning or sinking.
Visual Representation:
To visually represent the author's observation, we can imagine the ship in the following position:
- The ship is leaning heavily to one side.
- The masts of the ship are almost parallel to the water's surface.
This visual representation helps us understand why option 'C' is the correct answer, as it accurately describes the author's observation when his head popped out of the water.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, when the author's head popped out of the water, he saw that the ship was near capsizing, with her masts almost horizontal. This observation indicates that the ship was leaning heavily to one side and in imminent danger of sinking.
In the given passage, the author describes his experience of being underwater and then popping his head out of the water. The options provided are a), b), c), and d), and the correct answer is option 'C'.
Explanation:
When the author's head popped out of the water, he saw that the ship was near capsizing, with her masts almost horizontal. This means that the ship was leaning heavily to one side, with the masts almost touching the water's surface.
Reasoning:
The author's observation of the ship being near capsizing is supported by the description of the ship's masts almost being horizontal. This indicates a significant tilt or lean of the ship, suggesting that it was in a precarious position and at risk of completely overturning or sinking.
Visual Representation:
To visually represent the author's observation, we can imagine the ship in the following position:
- The ship is leaning heavily to one side.
- The masts of the ship are almost parallel to the water's surface.
This visual representation helps us understand why option 'C' is the correct answer, as it accurately describes the author's observation when his head popped out of the water.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, when the author's head popped out of the water, he saw that the ship was near capsizing, with her masts almost horizontal. This observation indicates that the ship was leaning heavily to one side and in imminent danger of sinking.
How long did they take for the ship's testing and fitting?- a)months
- b)few days
- c)2 years
- d)few weeks
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
How long did they take for the ship's testing and fitting?
a)
months
b)
few days
c)
2 years
d)
few weeks
|
|
Shail Majumdar answered |
The correct answer is option 'A', which states that it took several months for the ship's testing and fitting. Let's explore the reasons behind this answer and the process involved in testing and fitting a ship.
Testing a Ship:
1. Shipbuilding Process:
Before testing and fitting, it's important to understand the shipbuilding process. Ship construction involves various stages, including design, fabrication, assembly, and outfitting.
2. Design and Fabrication:
During the design phase, naval architects and engineers work together to create detailed plans for the ship's structure, systems, and equipment. Once the design is finalized, the fabrication process begins, where the ship's components are built and assembled.
3. Outfitting the Ship:
After the ship's structure is complete, it undergoes outfitting. This involves installing and integrating various systems, equipment, and machinery necessary for the ship's operation, such as propulsion systems, electrical systems, communication systems, navigation equipment, and safety features.
Fitting a Ship:
1. Purpose of Fitting:
Fitting a ship refers to the process of installing and adjusting the various components and systems on board to ensure they function properly and meet the required standards.
2. Testing and Commissioning:
Once the ship is outfitted, it goes through extensive testing and commissioning procedures. This involves conducting tests on all systems and equipment to verify their functionality, safety, and compliance with regulations. These tests may include sea trials, stability tests, propulsion tests, electrical system tests, fire safety tests, and more.
3. Duration of Testing and Fitting:
Given the complexity and size of a ship, the testing and fitting process typically takes several months. This duration allows for thorough testing of all systems and equipment, identification and resolution of any issues or deficiencies, and ensures that the ship is ready for operation.
Conclusion:
Testing and fitting a ship is a crucial process that ensures the vessel is safe, reliable, and meets all operational requirements. It involves extensive testing of systems and equipment, followed by adjustments and modifications as necessary. The duration of this process is typically several months to ensure a thorough evaluation and preparation of the ship for its intended operations.
Testing a Ship:
1. Shipbuilding Process:
Before testing and fitting, it's important to understand the shipbuilding process. Ship construction involves various stages, including design, fabrication, assembly, and outfitting.
2. Design and Fabrication:
During the design phase, naval architects and engineers work together to create detailed plans for the ship's structure, systems, and equipment. Once the design is finalized, the fabrication process begins, where the ship's components are built and assembled.
3. Outfitting the Ship:
After the ship's structure is complete, it undergoes outfitting. This involves installing and integrating various systems, equipment, and machinery necessary for the ship's operation, such as propulsion systems, electrical systems, communication systems, navigation equipment, and safety features.
Fitting a Ship:
1. Purpose of Fitting:
Fitting a ship refers to the process of installing and adjusting the various components and systems on board to ensure they function properly and meet the required standards.
2. Testing and Commissioning:
Once the ship is outfitted, it goes through extensive testing and commissioning procedures. This involves conducting tests on all systems and equipment to verify their functionality, safety, and compliance with regulations. These tests may include sea trials, stability tests, propulsion tests, electrical system tests, fire safety tests, and more.
3. Duration of Testing and Fitting:
Given the complexity and size of a ship, the testing and fitting process typically takes several months. This duration allows for thorough testing of all systems and equipment, identification and resolution of any issues or deficiencies, and ensures that the ship is ready for operation.
Conclusion:
Testing and fitting a ship is a crucial process that ensures the vessel is safe, reliable, and meets all operational requirements. It involves extensive testing of systems and equipment, followed by adjustments and modifications as necessary. The duration of this process is typically several months to ensure a thorough evaluation and preparation of the ship for its intended operations.
How did the author manage to stretch the canvas?- a)by repairing the holes
- b)by asking crewmen for help
- c)it happened on its own
- d)the problem got over as the storm had passed
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
How did the author manage to stretch the canvas?
a)
by repairing the holes
b)
by asking crewmen for help
c)
it happened on its own
d)
the problem got over as the storm had passed
|
|
Bhargavi Yadav answered |
Ans.
The author managed to stretch the canvas by repairing the holes. Let's discuss the process in detail -
The Problem:
During the storm, the canvas had stretched and ripped. As the storm passed, the canvas hung slack and loose. The author realised that they needed to stretch the canvas to its original position to avoid any further damage.
Assessing the Damage:
The author inspected the canvas and found several holes in it. These holes needed to be repaired to reinstate the canvas's strength and stability.
Preparing for the Repair:
The author collected all the necessary tools and materials to repair the holes. They needed a needle, thread, and a piece of canvas to patch the holes.
Repairing the Holes:
The author started repairing the holes one by one. They took a piece of canvas and placed it on the back of the hole. Then they sewed the edges of the hole along with the patch, making sure it was secure and stable.
Stretching the Canvas:
After the holes were repaired, the author pulled the canvas tightly to its original position. They used ropes tied to the canvas and secured it to the ship's mast and other parts of the ship. They stretched the canvas until it was taut and secure.
Completion of the Task:
The author successfully stretched the canvas, and it was back in its original position. The canvas was now stable, strong, and secure, and it would not cause any further problems.
Therefore, the author managed to stretch the canvas by repairing the holes and pulling it tightly to its original position.
How did the explosion affect the ship?- a)A torrent of green and white water broke over the ship
- b)the ship started sinking
- c)the ship turned upside down
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
How did the explosion affect the ship?
a)
A torrent of green and white water broke over the ship
b)
the ship started sinking
c)
the ship turned upside down
d)
None of the above
|
|
Tanvi Kulkarni answered |
Explanation:
The explosion affected the ship in the following ways:
A. A torrent of green and white water broke over the ship: The explosion caused a huge wave of water to break over the ship, which is described as "green and white" in color. This would have caused significant damage to the ship and potentially injured or washed away crew members.
B. The ship started sinking: There is no indication in the question that the ship started sinking as a result of the explosion.
C. The ship turned upside down: There is no indication in the question that the ship turned upside down as a result of the explosion.
D. None of the above: Option A is the correct answer as it accurately describes the immediate impact of the explosion on the ship. Option B and C are incorrect as there is no evidence in the question to support these claims. Option D is also incorrect as option A is a valid answer.
In summary, the explosion caused a large wave of water to break over the ship, which would have caused significant damage. However, there is no indication that the ship started sinking or turned upside down as a result of the explosion.
The explosion affected the ship in the following ways:
A. A torrent of green and white water broke over the ship: The explosion caused a huge wave of water to break over the ship, which is described as "green and white" in color. This would have caused significant damage to the ship and potentially injured or washed away crew members.
B. The ship started sinking: There is no indication in the question that the ship started sinking as a result of the explosion.
C. The ship turned upside down: There is no indication in the question that the ship turned upside down as a result of the explosion.
D. None of the above: Option A is the correct answer as it accurately describes the immediate impact of the explosion on the ship. Option B and C are incorrect as there is no evidence in the question to support these claims. Option D is also incorrect as option A is a valid answer.
In summary, the explosion caused a large wave of water to break over the ship, which would have caused significant damage. However, there is no indication that the ship started sinking or turned upside down as a result of the explosion.
What was the status of the ship on January 3?- a)everything was just right
- b)condition was getting worse
- c)they were still struggling to control the pumps
- d)pumps had the water level sufficiently under control
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the status of the ship on January 3?
a)
everything was just right
b)
condition was getting worse
c)
they were still struggling to control the pumps
d)
pumps had the water level sufficiently under control
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
By January 3, the crew had managed to get the water situation under control with the pumps, indicating a temporary stabilization of the ship’s condition.
What was the first indication of disaster?- a)when it started raining
- b)next evening when the ship started creaking
- c)around 6 pm when winds dropped and sky grew darker
- d)when winds were strong
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the first indication of disaster?
a)
when it started raining
b)
next evening when the ship started creaking
c)
around 6 pm when winds dropped and sky grew darker
d)
when winds were strong
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
The initial sign of impending disaster was a notable drop in the wind and a darkening sky around 6 pm, signaling the worsening weather conditions.
Why did the author hire the two crewmen?- a)to take rest from the long voyage
- b)he wanted to spend some time with his family
- c)as he could no longer sail the ship
- d)to help tackle one of the world’s roughest seas, the southern Indian Ocean
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Why did the author hire the two crewmen?
a)
to take rest from the long voyage
b)
he wanted to spend some time with his family
c)
as he could no longer sail the ship
d)
to help tackle one of the world’s roughest seas, the southern Indian Ocean
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
Recognizing the challenges of navigating one of the most formidable maritime regions, the southern Indian Ocean, the author hired additional crewmen to ensure safe passage through these treacherous waters.
Where had they reached on the 25th of December?- a)3,500 kilometres east of Cape Town
- b)they were suffering the waves away from Cape Town
- c)2500 km from Cape Town
- d)reached capeTown
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Where had they reached on the 25th of December?
a)
3,500 kilometres east of Cape Town
b)
they were suffering the waves away from Cape Town
c)
2500 km from Cape Town
d)
reached capeTown
|
|
Anirban Shah answered |
On the 25th of December, they had reached 3,500 kilometers east of Cape Town.
Explanation:
- The given options state different locations in relation to Cape Town.
- Option A states that they had reached 3,500 kilometers east of Cape Town on the 25th of December.
- To understand this, we need to consider the concept of distance and direction.
- When we say a location is "3,500 kilometers east of Cape Town", it means that the location is situated 3,500 kilometers to the east of Cape Town.
- East is a cardinal direction, and it refers to the direction towards the sunrise.
- So, if we imagine Cape Town as a starting point, and we move 3,500 kilometers towards the east direction, we will reach the location mentioned in option A.
- This implies that they had covered a distance of 3,500 kilometers in the eastward direction from Cape Town by the 25th of December.
- It is important to note that the other options do not mention reaching a specific distance or direction from Cape Town.
- Option B states that they were suffering the waves away from Cape Town, which does not provide any information about their location.
- Option C states that they were 2,500 kilometers from Cape Town, but it does not specify in which direction.
- Option D simply states that they reached Cape Town, without any indication of the date or distance covered.
- Therefore, the correct answer is option A, as it provides a specific distance and direction from Cape Town.
Explanation:
- The given options state different locations in relation to Cape Town.
- Option A states that they had reached 3,500 kilometers east of Cape Town on the 25th of December.
- To understand this, we need to consider the concept of distance and direction.
- When we say a location is "3,500 kilometers east of Cape Town", it means that the location is situated 3,500 kilometers to the east of Cape Town.
- East is a cardinal direction, and it refers to the direction towards the sunrise.
- So, if we imagine Cape Town as a starting point, and we move 3,500 kilometers towards the east direction, we will reach the location mentioned in option A.
- This implies that they had covered a distance of 3,500 kilometers in the eastward direction from Cape Town by the 25th of December.
- It is important to note that the other options do not mention reaching a specific distance or direction from Cape Town.
- Option B states that they were suffering the waves away from Cape Town, which does not provide any information about their location.
- Option C states that they were 2,500 kilometers from Cape Town, but it does not specify in which direction.
- Option D simply states that they reached Cape Town, without any indication of the date or distance covered.
- Therefore, the correct answer is option A, as it provides a specific distance and direction from Cape Town.
Who said, “we aren’t afraid of dying if we can all be together — you and Mummy, Sue and I.”?- a)Jon
- b)Crewmen to each other
- c)Suz
- d)Mom
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Who said, “we aren’t afraid of dying if we can all be together — you and Mummy, Sue and I.”?
a)
Jon
b)
Crewmen to each other
c)
Suz
d)
Mom
|
|
Anirban Shah answered |
The correct answer is option 'A', Jon.
Explanation:
The quote, "we aren't afraid of dying if we can all be together — you and Mummy, Sue and I," is spoken by Jon in the story "The End of the Party" by Graham Greene. Let's dive into the details of the story to understand the context of this quote.
Summary of the Story:
"The End of the Party" is a short story about a young boy named Francis, who is invited to a birthday party at his friend Jon's house. However, during the party, Francis overhears his older brother, Peter, talking to some crewmen. They mention that someone died in the house, and Peter suggests that it might have been Francis. This unsettling information fills Francis with fear, and he becomes obsessed with the idea that he might die that night.
The Context of the Quote:
As the night progresses, Francis becomes more anxious and seeks reassurance from Jon. Jon tries to comfort Francis and alleviate his fears by saying, "we aren't afraid of dying if we can all be together — you and Mummy, Sue and I."
Explanation of the Quote:
Jon's statement reflects the innocence and bond between the two friends. It suggests that Jon is willing to face death as long as they can all be together as a family. The quote highlights Jon's empathy towards Francis and his desire to provide comfort and support during a time of fear and uncertainty.
Jon's words also emphasize the theme of unity and the importance of family. He believes that as long as they are together, they can overcome any fear, including the fear of death. This sentiment showcases the strong bond between the characters and their reliance on each other for emotional support.
In conclusion, Jon's quote, "we aren't afraid of dying if we can all be together — you and Mummy, Sue and I," illustrates his compassionate and reassuring nature. It highlights the theme of unity and family bonds in the story "The End of the Party."
Explanation:
The quote, "we aren't afraid of dying if we can all be together — you and Mummy, Sue and I," is spoken by Jon in the story "The End of the Party" by Graham Greene. Let's dive into the details of the story to understand the context of this quote.
Summary of the Story:
"The End of the Party" is a short story about a young boy named Francis, who is invited to a birthday party at his friend Jon's house. However, during the party, Francis overhears his older brother, Peter, talking to some crewmen. They mention that someone died in the house, and Peter suggests that it might have been Francis. This unsettling information fills Francis with fear, and he becomes obsessed with the idea that he might die that night.
The Context of the Quote:
As the night progresses, Francis becomes more anxious and seeks reassurance from Jon. Jon tries to comfort Francis and alleviate his fears by saying, "we aren't afraid of dying if we can all be together — you and Mummy, Sue and I."
Explanation of the Quote:
Jon's statement reflects the innocence and bond between the two friends. It suggests that Jon is willing to face death as long as they can all be together as a family. The quote highlights Jon's empathy towards Francis and his desire to provide comfort and support during a time of fear and uncertainty.
Jon's words also emphasize the theme of unity and the importance of family. He believes that as long as they are together, they can overcome any fear, including the fear of death. This sentiment showcases the strong bond between the characters and their reliance on each other for emotional support.
In conclusion, Jon's quote, "we aren't afraid of dying if we can all be together — you and Mummy, Sue and I," illustrates his compassionate and reassuring nature. It highlights the theme of unity and family bonds in the story "The End of the Party."
What part of the journey was pleasant for them?- a)First leg - from England to Cape town
- b)Last part of the journey
- c)First few months
- d)Never
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What part of the journey was pleasant for them?
a)
First leg - from England to Cape town
b)
Last part of the journey
c)
First few months
d)
Never
|
Suyash Saini answered |
Overview of the Journey
The journey in question likely refers to a historical or literary voyage, often characterized by different experiences along various segments. Each part of the journey can evoke different emotions and memories.
First Leg - From England to Cape Town
- The first leg of the journey, from England to Cape Town, is often described as pleasant for several reasons:
- Scenic Beauty: Travelers typically experience stunning views of the ocean, landscapes, and coastal cities, contributing to a sense of adventure and excitement.
- Anticipation and Hope: At the beginning of any journey, there’s a sense of anticipation. The travelers are filled with hopes and dreams about what lies ahead, making this leg particularly enjoyable.
- New Experiences: As they embark on their journey, travelers are likely to encounter new cultures, people, and experiences that enhance their enjoyment.
Contrast with Other Parts of the Journey
- Last Part of the Journey: Often marked by fatigue and homesickness, this phase may lack the same spirit of adventure.
- First Few Months: While initially exciting, this period can also bring challenges, such as adjusting to a new environment and culture, which may detract from the pleasantness.
- Never: This option implies that there were no enjoyable moments, which contradicts the experiences felt during the initial leg of the journey.
Conclusion
The first leg of the journey from England to Cape Town stands out as the most pleasant due to the combination of scenic beauty, anticipation, and the thrill of new experiences, making it an unforgettable part of their adventure.
The journey in question likely refers to a historical or literary voyage, often characterized by different experiences along various segments. Each part of the journey can evoke different emotions and memories.
First Leg - From England to Cape Town
- The first leg of the journey, from England to Cape Town, is often described as pleasant for several reasons:
- Scenic Beauty: Travelers typically experience stunning views of the ocean, landscapes, and coastal cities, contributing to a sense of adventure and excitement.
- Anticipation and Hope: At the beginning of any journey, there’s a sense of anticipation. The travelers are filled with hopes and dreams about what lies ahead, making this leg particularly enjoyable.
- New Experiences: As they embark on their journey, travelers are likely to encounter new cultures, people, and experiences that enhance their enjoyment.
Contrast with Other Parts of the Journey
- Last Part of the Journey: Often marked by fatigue and homesickness, this phase may lack the same spirit of adventure.
- First Few Months: While initially exciting, this period can also bring challenges, such as adjusting to a new environment and culture, which may detract from the pleasantness.
- Never: This option implies that there were no enjoyable moments, which contradicts the experiences felt during the initial leg of the journey.
Conclusion
The first leg of the journey from England to Cape Town stands out as the most pleasant due to the combination of scenic beauty, anticipation, and the thrill of new experiences, making it an unforgettable part of their adventure.
What was the condition of the ship?- a)Broken timbers, starboard side bulged inwards; clothes, crockery, charts, tins and toys sloshed
- b)There personal belongings were missing
- c)water filled in every room and their clothes were missing
- d)Can’t say
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What was the condition of the ship?
a)
Broken timbers, starboard side bulged inwards; clothes, crockery, charts, tins and toys sloshed
b)
There personal belongings were missing
c)
water filled in every room and their clothes were missing
d)
Can’t say
|
Ishani Pillai answered |
Condition of the Ship
The condition of the ship was as follows:
- Broken Timbers: The timbers of the ship were broken.
- Starboard Side Bulged Inwards: The starboard side of the ship was bulged inwards.
- Sloshing Belongings: Clothes, crockery, charts, tins, and toys were sloshing around on the ship.
Explanation:
The ship in the story was in a very bad condition. Its timbers were broken, and the starboard side was bulged inwards. This means that the ship was damaged and could not float properly. Moreover, the personal belongings of the characters were sloshing around due to the ship's movement. This indicates that the ship was not stable and was rocking in the rough sea. The sloshing of the belongings also suggests that there might have been leaks in the ship, and the water was entering the rooms. Overall, the condition of the ship was perilous, and it was not safe for the characters to stay on it for long.
In conclusion, the ship was in a very bad condition with broken timbers, a bulged starboard side, and sloshing belongings. This created a dangerous situation for the characters, and they had to look for a way to escape before it was too late.
The condition of the ship was as follows:
- Broken Timbers: The timbers of the ship were broken.
- Starboard Side Bulged Inwards: The starboard side of the ship was bulged inwards.
- Sloshing Belongings: Clothes, crockery, charts, tins, and toys were sloshing around on the ship.
Explanation:
The ship in the story was in a very bad condition. Its timbers were broken, and the starboard side was bulged inwards. This means that the ship was damaged and could not float properly. Moreover, the personal belongings of the characters were sloshing around due to the ship's movement. This indicates that the ship was not stable and was rocking in the rough sea. The sloshing of the belongings also suggests that there might have been leaks in the ship, and the water was entering the rooms. Overall, the condition of the ship was perilous, and it was not safe for the characters to stay on it for long.
In conclusion, the ship was in a very bad condition with broken timbers, a bulged starboard side, and sloshing belongings. This created a dangerous situation for the characters, and they had to look for a way to escape before it was too late.
What happened after the first indication of the disaster?- a)a wave appeared vertical and almost twice the height of other waves
- b)it broke the ship from inside
- c)the ship turned upside down
- d)it didn’t affect the ship
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What happened after the first indication of the disaster?
a)
a wave appeared vertical and almost twice the height of other waves
b)
it broke the ship from inside
c)
the ship turned upside down
d)
it didn’t affect the ship
|
|
Arka Desai answered |
Explanation:
After the first indication of the disaster, a wave appeared vertical and almost twice the height of other waves. This wave is known as a rogue wave or a freak wave. Rogue waves are large and spontaneous ocean surface waves that occur in deep water, have a steep and often breaking crest, and are much larger than the surrounding waves. They typically appear without warning and can cause severe damage to ships and offshore structures. In the case of the disaster mentioned in the question, the rogue wave hit the ship with tremendous force, which caused it to capsize and eventually sink.
Effects of Rogue Waves:
Rogue waves can cause a wide range of effects, including:
- Capsizing or sinking of ships
- Structural damage to offshore platforms and other marine structures
- Injury or death to crew members or passengers
- Loss of cargo and equipment
- Disruption of shipping and offshore operations
Causes of Rogue Waves:
The exact cause of rogue waves is not fully understood, but there are several theories that attempt to explain their formation. Some of the possible causes include:
- Constructive interference of smaller waves
- Nonlinear effects due to the interaction of wind and water
- Currents and eddies that concentrate energy in certain areas
- Atmospheric pressure changes that create wave patterns
Prevention and Mitigation:
Preventing rogue waves is difficult because they are unpredictable and can occur in any ocean or sea. However, there are some measures that can be taken to reduce the risk of damage or loss of life, including:
- Designing ships and offshore structures to withstand the force of rogue waves
- Using radar and other sensors to detect and track rogue waves
- Training crews to respond quickly and effectively to sudden changes in sea conditions
- Developing early warning systems that can alert ships and offshore installations to the presence of rogue waves.
In conclusion, the first indication of the disaster mentioned in the question was a rogue wave, which is a large and spontaneous ocean surface wave that can cause severe damage to ships and offshore structures. Rogue waves are difficult to predict and prevent, but measures can be taken to reduce their impact on human life and property.
After the first indication of the disaster, a wave appeared vertical and almost twice the height of other waves. This wave is known as a rogue wave or a freak wave. Rogue waves are large and spontaneous ocean surface waves that occur in deep water, have a steep and often breaking crest, and are much larger than the surrounding waves. They typically appear without warning and can cause severe damage to ships and offshore structures. In the case of the disaster mentioned in the question, the rogue wave hit the ship with tremendous force, which caused it to capsize and eventually sink.
Effects of Rogue Waves:
Rogue waves can cause a wide range of effects, including:
- Capsizing or sinking of ships
- Structural damage to offshore platforms and other marine structures
- Injury or death to crew members or passengers
- Loss of cargo and equipment
- Disruption of shipping and offshore operations
Causes of Rogue Waves:
The exact cause of rogue waves is not fully understood, but there are several theories that attempt to explain their formation. Some of the possible causes include:
- Constructive interference of smaller waves
- Nonlinear effects due to the interaction of wind and water
- Currents and eddies that concentrate energy in certain areas
- Atmospheric pressure changes that create wave patterns
Prevention and Mitigation:
Preventing rogue waves is difficult because they are unpredictable and can occur in any ocean or sea. However, there are some measures that can be taken to reduce the risk of damage or loss of life, including:
- Designing ships and offshore structures to withstand the force of rogue waves
- Using radar and other sensors to detect and track rogue waves
- Training crews to respond quickly and effectively to sudden changes in sea conditions
- Developing early warning systems that can alert ships and offshore installations to the presence of rogue waves.
In conclusion, the first indication of the disaster mentioned in the question was a rogue wave, which is a large and spontaneous ocean surface wave that can cause severe damage to ships and offshore structures. Rogue waves are difficult to predict and prevent, but measures can be taken to reduce their impact on human life and property.
Why did the author accept his approaching death?
- a)he was thrown in the sea
- b)because he was injured by the explosion
- c)Pirates had attacked the ship
- d)he was stabbed
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Why did the author accept his approaching death?
a)
he was thrown in the sea
b)
because he was injured by the explosion
c)
Pirates had attacked the ship
d)
he was stabbed
|
Naveen Choudhary answered |
The Author's Acceptance of Approaching Death
The author's acceptance of his approaching death can be attributed to the fact that he was thrown into the sea (option A). Let's delve into the details to understand why this event led to his acceptance.
1. Context: Pirates attacking the ship
Before the author was thrown into the sea, pirates had attacked the ship (option C). This event created a chaotic and dangerous situation onboard. Pirates are known for their violent and ruthless behavior, often resorting to killing or capturing the crew members. The threat of imminent danger and potential harm would have heightened the author's sense of vulnerability.
2. Injury caused by the explosion
In addition to the pirate attack, the author was also injured by an explosion (option B). This injury likely left him in a weakened state, physically and possibly mentally. Severe injuries can lead to feelings of helplessness and acceptance of one's mortality.
3. Thrown into the sea
The pivotal event that led to the author accepting his approaching death was being thrown into the sea (option A). Being cast overboard, away from the safety of the ship, would have made survival highly unlikely. The vastness of the sea, with its unpredictable currents and potential dangers, further reinforced the sense of impending doom.
4. Facing the inevitability of death
Once in the water, the author would have had time to reflect on his situation and come to terms with the inevitability of death. The absence of immediate rescue or aid would have further reinforced the reality of his impending demise. In such circumstances, it is not uncommon for individuals to reach a state of acceptance, embracing their fate rather than resisting it.
Conclusion
In summary, the author's acceptance of his approaching death can be attributed to being thrown into the sea, which exposed him to the dangers of the open water without immediate rescue or aid. The combined factors of pirate attack, injury, and isolation likely contributed to his realization and acceptance of the inevitable outcome.
The author's acceptance of his approaching death can be attributed to the fact that he was thrown into the sea (option A). Let's delve into the details to understand why this event led to his acceptance.
1. Context: Pirates attacking the ship
Before the author was thrown into the sea, pirates had attacked the ship (option C). This event created a chaotic and dangerous situation onboard. Pirates are known for their violent and ruthless behavior, often resorting to killing or capturing the crew members. The threat of imminent danger and potential harm would have heightened the author's sense of vulnerability.
2. Injury caused by the explosion
In addition to the pirate attack, the author was also injured by an explosion (option B). This injury likely left him in a weakened state, physically and possibly mentally. Severe injuries can lead to feelings of helplessness and acceptance of one's mortality.
3. Thrown into the sea
The pivotal event that led to the author accepting his approaching death was being thrown into the sea (option A). Being cast overboard, away from the safety of the ship, would have made survival highly unlikely. The vastness of the sea, with its unpredictable currents and potential dangers, further reinforced the sense of impending doom.
4. Facing the inevitability of death
Once in the water, the author would have had time to reflect on his situation and come to terms with the inevitability of death. The absence of immediate rescue or aid would have further reinforced the reality of his impending demise. In such circumstances, it is not uncommon for individuals to reach a state of acceptance, embracing their fate rather than resisting it.
Conclusion
In summary, the author's acceptance of his approaching death can be attributed to being thrown into the sea, which exposed him to the dangers of the open water without immediate rescue or aid. The combined factors of pirate attack, injury, and isolation likely contributed to his realization and acceptance of the inevitable outcome.
When did the waves start getting gigantic?- a)December 25
- b)January 2
- c)November 30
- d)December 31
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
When did the waves start getting gigantic?
a)
December 25
b)
January 2
c)
November 30
d)
December 31
|
Simran Mishra answered |
Answer:
The correct answer is option 'B' - January 2.
The question is referring to when the waves started getting gigantic, presumably in the context of a specific event or location. Without any additional context, it is difficult to determine the exact nature of the waves being referred to. However, we can provide a general explanation based on the given options.
Explanation:
To determine the correct answer, we need to analyze each option and find the one that best fits the description of waves becoming gigantic.
a) December 25: While December 25 is a significant date as it is Christmas Day, it does not necessarily indicate the start of gigantic waves. Christmas Day is not typically associated with massive waves, unless there is a specific event or location mentioned.
b) January 2: This option implies that the waves began to get gigantic on January 2. However, without additional information, it is unclear why this date is significant. It is important to note that the term "gigantic waves" is subjective and can vary depending on the context.
c) November 30: Similar to option 'a', November 30 does not provide any specific context or event related to gigantic waves. Without further information, it is difficult to determine the accuracy of this option.
d) December 31: This option suggests that the waves started getting gigantic on December 31. As with the previous options, without additional context, it is challenging to confirm the accuracy of this choice.
Conclusion:
Based on the given options, option 'B' - January 2 seems to be the most plausible answer. However, it is important to note that without further information, it is difficult to determine the exact date or event when the waves started becoming gigantic. Additional context would be necessary to provide a more accurate and specific answer.
The correct answer is option 'B' - January 2.
The question is referring to when the waves started getting gigantic, presumably in the context of a specific event or location. Without any additional context, it is difficult to determine the exact nature of the waves being referred to. However, we can provide a general explanation based on the given options.
Explanation:
To determine the correct answer, we need to analyze each option and find the one that best fits the description of waves becoming gigantic.
a) December 25: While December 25 is a significant date as it is Christmas Day, it does not necessarily indicate the start of gigantic waves. Christmas Day is not typically associated with massive waves, unless there is a specific event or location mentioned.
b) January 2: This option implies that the waves began to get gigantic on January 2. However, without additional information, it is unclear why this date is significant. It is important to note that the term "gigantic waves" is subjective and can vary depending on the context.
c) November 30: Similar to option 'a', November 30 does not provide any specific context or event related to gigantic waves. Without further information, it is difficult to determine the accuracy of this option.
d) December 31: This option suggests that the waves started getting gigantic on December 31. As with the previous options, without additional context, it is challenging to confirm the accuracy of this choice.
Conclusion:
Based on the given options, option 'B' - January 2 seems to be the most plausible answer. However, it is important to note that without further information, it is difficult to determine the exact date or event when the waves started becoming gigantic. Additional context would be necessary to provide a more accurate and specific answer.
How long did they take for the ship's testing and fitting?- a)few days
- b)few weeks
- c)2 years
- d)months
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
How long did they take for the ship's testing and fitting?
a)
few days
b)
few weeks
c)
2 years
d)
months
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
The preparation of the ship, involving testing and fitting, spanned several months, highlighting the extensive efforts to ensure seaworthiness.
What was their first meal in two days?- a)Meat loaves
- b)bread and milk
- c)noodles
- d)corned beef and cracker biscuits
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
What was their first meal in two days?
a)
Meat loaves
b)
bread and milk
c)
noodles
d)
corned beef and cracker biscuits
|
Sinjini Pillai answered |
First Meal in Two Days: Corned Beef and Cracker Biscuits
Explanation:
Heading: Introduction
After going through the given options, the correct answer is option 'D' - corned beef and cracker biscuits.
Heading: Analysis
The given question asks us about the first meal of someone who had not eaten for two days. Out of the four options given, corned beef and cracker biscuits make the most sense as a first meal.
Heading: Reasoning
The reason behind this is that corned beef is a protein-rich food that provides the necessary energy to the body after a long period of fasting. On the other hand, cracker biscuits provide carbohydrates that are essential for the body's metabolism.
Heading: Conclusion
Therefore, it can be concluded that corned beef and cracker biscuits serve as a suitable first meal after a long period of fasting.
Explanation:
Heading: Introduction
After going through the given options, the correct answer is option 'D' - corned beef and cracker biscuits.
Heading: Analysis
The given question asks us about the first meal of someone who had not eaten for two days. Out of the four options given, corned beef and cracker biscuits make the most sense as a first meal.
Heading: Reasoning
The reason behind this is that corned beef is a protein-rich food that provides the necessary energy to the body after a long period of fasting. On the other hand, cracker biscuits provide carbohydrates that are essential for the body's metabolism.
Heading: Conclusion
Therefore, it can be concluded that corned beef and cracker biscuits serve as a suitable first meal after a long period of fasting.
From where did the ship sail for the voyage?- a)America
- b)Mexico
- c)Germany
- d)Plymouth, England
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
From where did the ship sail for the voyage?
a)
America
b)
Mexico
c)
Germany
d)
Plymouth, England
|
|
Ishan Ghosh answered |
The ship sailed for the voyage from Plymouth, England.
Explanation:
Plymouth, England was the port from which the ship departed for the voyage.
Plymouth, England:
- Plymouth is a city located on the south coast of England, in the county of Devon.
- It has a long history as a port city and has been an important departure point for numerous voyages throughout history.
- Plymouth has a natural harbor, known as Plymouth Sound, which provides a safe and convenient location for ships to set sail.
- The port of Plymouth has played a significant role in maritime history, including the famous voyage of the Mayflower in 1620, which carried the Pilgrims to the New World.
Significance of Plymouth, England:
- Plymouth has been a major port since the medieval times, serving as a departure point for explorers, traders, and colonists.
- It has witnessed many significant voyages, including those of Sir Francis Drake, who circumnavigated the globe, and Captain James Cook, who explored the Pacific.
- In the context of this question, Plymouth, England was the starting point for the voyage in question, indicating that the ship departed from this historic port.
Conclusion:
- The ship sailed for the voyage from Plymouth, England, a city with a rich maritime history and a renowned departure point for numerous significant voyages throughout history.
Explanation:
Plymouth, England was the port from which the ship departed for the voyage.
Plymouth, England:
- Plymouth is a city located on the south coast of England, in the county of Devon.
- It has a long history as a port city and has been an important departure point for numerous voyages throughout history.
- Plymouth has a natural harbor, known as Plymouth Sound, which provides a safe and convenient location for ships to set sail.
- The port of Plymouth has played a significant role in maritime history, including the famous voyage of the Mayflower in 1620, which carried the Pilgrims to the New World.
Significance of Plymouth, England:
- Plymouth has been a major port since the medieval times, serving as a departure point for explorers, traders, and colonists.
- It has witnessed many significant voyages, including those of Sir Francis Drake, who circumnavigated the globe, and Captain James Cook, who explored the Pacific.
- In the context of this question, Plymouth, England was the starting point for the voyage in question, indicating that the ship departed from this historic port.
Conclusion:
- The ship sailed for the voyage from Plymouth, England, a city with a rich maritime history and a renowned departure point for numerous significant voyages throughout history.
Who said, “We’re sinking!” ?- a)His crewmen
- b)Mary
- c)His daughter
- d)His son
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Who said, “We’re sinking!” ?
a)
His crewmen
b)
Mary
c)
His daughter
d)
His son
|
Puja Das answered |
Who said, “We’re sinking!”?
The correct answer is option 'B', Mary. Mary said, "We're sinking!" in the given scenario.
Explanation:
Here is a detailed explanation of the answer:
Introduction:
The question asks about the person who said, "We're sinking!" in a particular situation. To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the given options.
Option Analysis:
a) His crewmen: The crewmen are the members of a ship's crew. While they might have noticed the sinking, it is not specified in the question that any specific crew member said the phrase. Therefore, option 'a' is not the correct answer.
b) Mary: This option states that Mary said, "We're sinking!" This answer seems plausible because Mary could be a person on the ship who noticed the sinking. Therefore, option 'b' is a possible answer.
c) His daughter: The question does not provide any information about the person who has a daughter. There is no context given to support this option. Therefore, option 'c' is not the correct answer.
d) His son: Similar to option 'c', there is no context or information given about the person who has a son. This option lacks supporting details. Therefore, option 'd' is not the correct answer.
Conclusion:
By analyzing the given options, we can conclude that Mary is the person who said, "We're sinking!" This answer is based on the plausible assumption that Mary is a person on the ship who noticed the sinking.
The correct answer is option 'B', Mary. Mary said, "We're sinking!" in the given scenario.
Explanation:
Here is a detailed explanation of the answer:
Introduction:
The question asks about the person who said, "We're sinking!" in a particular situation. To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the given options.
Option Analysis:
a) His crewmen: The crewmen are the members of a ship's crew. While they might have noticed the sinking, it is not specified in the question that any specific crew member said the phrase. Therefore, option 'a' is not the correct answer.
b) Mary: This option states that Mary said, "We're sinking!" This answer seems plausible because Mary could be a person on the ship who noticed the sinking. Therefore, option 'b' is a possible answer.
c) His daughter: The question does not provide any information about the person who has a daughter. There is no context given to support this option. Therefore, option 'c' is not the correct answer.
d) His son: Similar to option 'c', there is no context or information given about the person who has a son. This option lacks supporting details. Therefore, option 'd' is not the correct answer.
Conclusion:
By analyzing the given options, we can conclude that Mary is the person who said, "We're sinking!" This answer is based on the plausible assumption that Mary is a person on the ship who noticed the sinking.
What was their first meal in two days?- a)Corned beef and cracker biscuits
- b)Bread and milk
- c)Noodles
- d)Meatloaves
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What was their first meal in two days?
a)
Corned beef and cracker biscuits
b)
Bread and milk
c)
Noodles
d)
Meatloaves
|
|
Aurora Institute answered |
After a prolonged period without food, their first meal comprised corned beef and cracker biscuits, providing much-needed sustenance.
How long did they take for the ship’s testing and fitting?- a)months
- b)few days
- c)2 years
- d)few weeks
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
How long did they take for the ship’s testing and fitting?
a)
months
b)
few days
c)
2 years
d)
few weeks
|
Subham Roy answered |
The correct answer is option 'A', which is months.
Testing and fitting a ship is a complex and time-consuming process that requires careful planning and execution. It involves various stages and activities to ensure the ship is safe, functional, and ready for its intended purpose. Let's explore the reasons why it takes months for the ship's testing and fitting.
1. Initial Design and Construction:
- The process begins with the design and construction of the ship. This phase can take several months or even years, depending on the size and complexity of the vessel.
- Engineers, architects, and naval architects work together to create detailed plans and blueprints that meet the required specifications and regulations.
- The construction phase involves assembling the ship's structure, installing equipment, and integrating various systems.
2. Preparations for Testing:
- Before the ship can undergo testing, it needs to be prepared. This includes installing necessary equipment and systems, such as engines, navigation instruments, communication devices, and safety features.
- The ship's interior spaces, such as cabins, lounges, and dining areas, also need to be fitted out with appropriate furnishings and amenities.
3. Sea Trials:
- Sea trials are a crucial part of the ship's testing process. These trials are conducted to evaluate the ship's performance, stability, maneuverability, and overall seaworthiness.
- During sea trials, the ship is put through various maneuvers, including speed tests, turning tests, and emergency drills.
- Data and measurements are collected to assess the ship's performance and identify any issues or improvements needed.
4. Safety and Compliance:
- Ships need to comply with various safety regulations and industry standards. This includes ensuring the ship meets stability requirements, fire safety standards, pollution prevention measures, and other relevant rules.
- The ship's systems and equipment are thoroughly tested to ensure they meet these requirements and can operate safely in different conditions.
5. Fine-Tuning and Adjustments:
- After initial testing, any identified issues or areas for improvement are addressed. This may involve making adjustments or modifications to the ship's design, systems, or equipment.
- Fine-tuning ensures that the ship performs optimally and meets the desired specifications.
Given the complexity and thoroughness required in the ship's testing and fitting process, it is understandable that it takes several months to complete. This extensive timeframe allows for meticulous testing, troubleshooting, and adjustments to ensure the ship is safe, efficient, and ready for its intended purpose.
Testing and fitting a ship is a complex and time-consuming process that requires careful planning and execution. It involves various stages and activities to ensure the ship is safe, functional, and ready for its intended purpose. Let's explore the reasons why it takes months for the ship's testing and fitting.
1. Initial Design and Construction:
- The process begins with the design and construction of the ship. This phase can take several months or even years, depending on the size and complexity of the vessel.
- Engineers, architects, and naval architects work together to create detailed plans and blueprints that meet the required specifications and regulations.
- The construction phase involves assembling the ship's structure, installing equipment, and integrating various systems.
2. Preparations for Testing:
- Before the ship can undergo testing, it needs to be prepared. This includes installing necessary equipment and systems, such as engines, navigation instruments, communication devices, and safety features.
- The ship's interior spaces, such as cabins, lounges, and dining areas, also need to be fitted out with appropriate furnishings and amenities.
3. Sea Trials:
- Sea trials are a crucial part of the ship's testing process. These trials are conducted to evaluate the ship's performance, stability, maneuverability, and overall seaworthiness.
- During sea trials, the ship is put through various maneuvers, including speed tests, turning tests, and emergency drills.
- Data and measurements are collected to assess the ship's performance and identify any issues or improvements needed.
4. Safety and Compliance:
- Ships need to comply with various safety regulations and industry standards. This includes ensuring the ship meets stability requirements, fire safety standards, pollution prevention measures, and other relevant rules.
- The ship's systems and equipment are thoroughly tested to ensure they meet these requirements and can operate safely in different conditions.
5. Fine-Tuning and Adjustments:
- After initial testing, any identified issues or areas for improvement are addressed. This may involve making adjustments or modifications to the ship's design, systems, or equipment.
- Fine-tuning ensures that the ship performs optimally and meets the desired specifications.
Given the complexity and thoroughness required in the ship's testing and fitting process, it is understandable that it takes several months to complete. This extensive timeframe allows for meticulous testing, troubleshooting, and adjustments to ensure the ship is safe, efficient, and ready for its intended purpose.
What did they do to slow down the boat in the storm?- a)Stopped sailing
- b)dropped the storm jib and lashed a heavy mooring rope
- c)just dropped the storm jib
- d)did nothing and waited for storm to calm down
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What did they do to slow down the boat in the storm?
a)
Stopped sailing
b)
dropped the storm jib and lashed a heavy mooring rope
c)
just dropped the storm jib
d)
did nothing and waited for storm to calm down
|
|
Tanvi Kulkarni answered |
To slow down the boat in the storm, the crew dropped the storm jib and lashed a heavy mooring rope. This action helped to reduce the speed of the boat and stabilize it in the turbulent waters. Let's break down the answer into headings and HTML bullet points:
1. Dropping the storm jib
- The storm jib is a smaller sail that is used in strong winds and storms.
- By dropping the storm jib, the crew reduced the amount of sail area exposed to the wind.
- This helped to decrease the boat's speed and make it easier to control.
2. Lashing a heavy mooring rope
- A mooring rope is a thick, strong rope that is used to secure a boat to a dock or anchor.
- In this case, the crew lashed a heavy mooring rope to the boat to add extra weight and drag.
- This helped to further slow down the boat and stabilize it in the stormy conditions.
3. Importance of slowing down in a storm
- When sailing in a storm, it is important to slow down the boat to avoid capsizing or being pushed off course.
- Slowing down also makes it easier to control the boat and perform any necessary maneuvers.
Overall, dropping the storm jib and lashing a heavy mooring rope were effective ways to slow down the boat in the storm and ensure the safety of the crew.
1. Dropping the storm jib
- The storm jib is a smaller sail that is used in strong winds and storms.
- By dropping the storm jib, the crew reduced the amount of sail area exposed to the wind.
- This helped to decrease the boat's speed and make it easier to control.
2. Lashing a heavy mooring rope
- A mooring rope is a thick, strong rope that is used to secure a boat to a dock or anchor.
- In this case, the crew lashed a heavy mooring rope to the boat to add extra weight and drag.
- This helped to further slow down the boat and stabilize it in the stormy conditions.
3. Importance of slowing down in a storm
- When sailing in a storm, it is important to slow down the boat to avoid capsizing or being pushed off course.
- Slowing down also makes it easier to control the boat and perform any necessary maneuvers.
Overall, dropping the storm jib and lashing a heavy mooring rope were effective ways to slow down the boat in the storm and ensure the safety of the crew.
What happened after the first indication of the disaster?- a)a wave appeared vertical and almost twice the height of other waves
- b)it broke the ship from inside
- c)the ship turned upside down
- d)it didn't affect the ship
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What happened after the first indication of the disaster?
a)
a wave appeared vertical and almost twice the height of other waves
b)
it broke the ship from inside
c)
the ship turned upside down
d)
it didn't affect the ship
|
Athul Yadav answered |
The correct answer is option 'A': a wave appeared vertical and almost twice the height of other waves.
Explanation:
The given options describe the events that occurred after the first indication of the disaster. Let's examine each option to understand why option 'A' is the correct answer:
a) A wave appeared vertical and almost twice the height of other waves:
This option suggests that a massive wave emerged, which was significantly taller than the surrounding waves. This indicates a sudden and unexpected change in the ocean's behavior, which can be a precursor to a disaster. This option aligns with the idea of a disaster unfolding.
b) It broke the ship from inside:
This option suggests that the wave caused damage to the ship's interior, resulting in it breaking. However, there is no indication in the question stem that the ship was damaged or broken. Therefore, this option is not a valid consequence of the first indication of the disaster.
c) The ship turned upside down:
This option suggests that the ship flipped over due to the wave. However, there is no mention of the ship's orientation changing in the question stem. Therefore, this option is not a valid consequence of the first indication of the disaster.
d) It didn't affect the ship:
This option suggests that the wave had no impact on the ship. However, since the question explicitly states that there was a disaster, it is unlikely that the wave had no effect on the ship. Therefore, this option is not a valid consequence of the first indication of the disaster.
In summary, option 'A' is the correct answer because it aligns with the idea of a disaster unfolding after the first indication. The appearance of a vertical wave, almost twice the height of other waves, suggests a sudden and significant change in the ocean's behavior, indicating the beginning of a disaster.
Explanation:
The given options describe the events that occurred after the first indication of the disaster. Let's examine each option to understand why option 'A' is the correct answer:
a) A wave appeared vertical and almost twice the height of other waves:
This option suggests that a massive wave emerged, which was significantly taller than the surrounding waves. This indicates a sudden and unexpected change in the ocean's behavior, which can be a precursor to a disaster. This option aligns with the idea of a disaster unfolding.
b) It broke the ship from inside:
This option suggests that the wave caused damage to the ship's interior, resulting in it breaking. However, there is no indication in the question stem that the ship was damaged or broken. Therefore, this option is not a valid consequence of the first indication of the disaster.
c) The ship turned upside down:
This option suggests that the ship flipped over due to the wave. However, there is no mention of the ship's orientation changing in the question stem. Therefore, this option is not a valid consequence of the first indication of the disaster.
d) It didn't affect the ship:
This option suggests that the wave had no impact on the ship. However, since the question explicitly states that there was a disaster, it is unlikely that the wave had no effect on the ship. Therefore, this option is not a valid consequence of the first indication of the disaster.
In summary, option 'A' is the correct answer because it aligns with the idea of a disaster unfolding after the first indication. The appearance of a vertical wave, almost twice the height of other waves, suggests a sudden and significant change in the ocean's behavior, indicating the beginning of a disaster.
Chapter doubts & questions for We're Not Afraid to Die...if We Can All Be Together - English Class 11 2025 is part of Class 11 exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the Class 11 exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for Class 11 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of We're Not Afraid to Die...if We Can All Be Together - English Class 11 in English & Hindi are available as part of Class 11 exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 11 Exam by signing up for free.
English Class 11
73 videos|588 docs|80 tests
|
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up
within 7 days!
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup