All Exams  >   SSC CGL  >   General Intelligence and Reasoning for SSC CGL  >   All Questions

All questions of Statement and Conclusions for SSC CGL Exam

Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer :
Statements : To cultivate interest in reading, the school has made it compulsory from June this year for each student to read two books per week and submit a weekly report on the books.
Conclusions :
I. Interest in reading can be created by force.
II. Some students will eventually develop interest in reading.
  • a)
    Only conclusion I follows
  • b)
    Only conclusion II follows
  • c)
    Either I or II follows
  • d)
    Neither I nor II follows
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Pranab Goyal answered
Understanding the Statement
The statement indicates that the school has implemented a policy to encourage reading by mandating students to read two books weekly and submit reports. This is a strategic approach to foster a reading culture among students.
Analyzing the Conclusions
- Conclusion I: Interest in reading can be created by force.
- This conclusion suggests that imposing rules will inherently create an interest in reading. However, interest is usually a personal and intrinsic feeling. While some students might comply with the reading requirement, it doesn’t guarantee that they will genuinely develop an interest in reading. Thus, this conclusion is not valid.
- Conclusion II: Some students will eventually develop an interest in reading.
- This conclusion is more plausible. By being exposed to books regularly, students may discover genres or stories that resonate with them. Over time, some may cultivate a genuine interest in reading. This aligns with the idea that sustained exposure can lead to engagement, making this conclusion valid.
Final Assessment
Given the analysis of both conclusions:
- Only Conclusion II is supported by the information provided in the statement.
- Conclusion I lacks a strong basis as interest cannot be forcibly created.
Correct Answer
Thus, the correct answer is option 'B': Only conclusion II follows.

Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer :
Statements : Use "Kraft" colours. They add colour to our life. - An advertisement.
Conclusions :
I. Catchy slogans do not attract people.
II. People like dark colours.
  • a)
    Only conclusion I follows
  • b)
    Only conclusion II follows
  • c)
    Either I or II follows
  • d)
    Neither I nor II follows
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Arnav Saini answered
Understanding the Statement and Conclusions
The statement presents an advertisement for "Kraft" colours, claiming they add colour to our life. Let's analyze the conclusions drawn from this statement.
Conclusion I: Catchy slogans do not attract people.
- This conclusion suggests that the effectiveness of catchy slogans is negated.
- However, the statement does not provide evidence or context to support this assertion.
- The advertisement itself implies that catchy slogans can attract attention, as it’s designed to promote a product.
Conclusion II: People like dark colours.
- This conclusion assumes a preference for dark colours without any direct reference in the statement.
- The phrase "Kraft colours" could encompass a wide range of colours, not limited to dark shades.
- The statement emphasizes the positive impact of colours on life but does not specify which colours are preferred.
Why Both Conclusions are Incorrect
- Neither conclusion logically follows from the statement provided.
- The advertisement does not make claims regarding the effectiveness of slogans or specific colour preferences.
- Therefore, both conclusions lack sufficient support and cannot be deduced from the statement.
Final Verdict
- Based on the analysis, the correct answer is option 'D' - neither conclusion I nor II follows.
- This indicates that the conclusions do not logically connect with the statement made in the advertisement.
In summary, critical evaluation of the statement and conclusions shows that assumptions made in the conclusions do not align with the information provided in the advertisement.

Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer :
Statements : Only good singers are invited in the conference. No one without sweet voice is a good singer.
Conclusions :
I. All invited singers in the conference have sweet voice.
II. Those singers who do not have sweet voice are not invited in the conference.
  • a)
    Only conclusion I follows
  • b)
    Only conclusion II follows
  • c)
    Either I or II follows
  • d)
    Both I and II follow
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Understanding the Statements
The provided statements are:
- Statement 1: Only good singers are invited to the conference.
- Statement 2: No one without a sweet voice is a good singer.
These statements help us deduce certain conclusions about the relationship between good singers, sweet voices, and conference invitations.
Analyzing the Conclusions
The conclusions drawn from the statements are:
- Conclusion I: All invited singers in the conference have sweet voices.
- Conclusion II: Those singers who do not have sweet voices are not invited to the conference.
Validity of Conclusion I
- Since "only good singers are invited" and "no one without a sweet voice is a good singer," we can infer:
- All good singers must have sweet voices.
- Hence, all singers invited to the conference (who are good singers) must possess a sweet voice.
Thus, Conclusion I is valid.
Validity of Conclusion II
- The second conclusion states that singers who lack sweet voices are not invited.
- Given that only good singers (who must have sweet voices) are invited, it follows logically that any singer without a sweet voice cannot be a good singer and therefore cannot be invited.
Thus, Conclusion II is also valid.
Final Evaluation
Both conclusions logically follow from the statements provided:
- Conclusion I is true because invited singers are good singers, and all good singers have sweet voices.
- Conclusion II is true because singers without sweet voices cannot be good singers and, therefore, cannot be invited.
Correct Answer
Since both conclusions are valid, the correct answer is option 'D': Both I and II follow.

Chapter doubts & questions for Statement and Conclusions - General Intelligence and Reasoning for SSC CGL 2025 is part of SSC CGL exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the SSC CGL exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for SSC CGL 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.

Chapter doubts & questions of Statement and Conclusions - General Intelligence and Reasoning for SSC CGL in English & Hindi are available as part of SSC CGL exam. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SSC CGL Exam by signing up for free.

Top Courses SSC CGL