All Exams >
SSC CGL >
General Intelligence and Reasoning for SSC CGL >
All Questions
All questions of Evaluating Inferences for SSC CGL Exam
(A) I believe that 20% of your work generates 80% of your returns
(B) Justice R Banumathi recently became the first woman judge from Tamil Nadu to be elevated to the Supreme Court.
(C) Raman asks a lot of questions in the class. This leads to him understanding the class concepts better than others.
(D) Taking the CLAT online may or may not lead to an increase in the number of aspirants taking the CLAT.- a)JFJJ
- b)JFFF
- c)JFII
- d)FJFJ
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
(A) I believe that 20% of your work generates 80% of your returns
(B) Justice R Banumathi recently became the first woman judge from Tamil Nadu to be elevated to the Supreme Court.
(C) Raman asks a lot of questions in the class. This leads to him understanding the class concepts better than others.
(D) Taking the CLAT online may or may not lead to an increase in the number of aspirants taking the CLAT.
(B) Justice R Banumathi recently became the first woman judge from Tamil Nadu to be elevated to the Supreme Court.
(C) Raman asks a lot of questions in the class. This leads to him understanding the class concepts better than others.
(D) Taking the CLAT online may or may not lead to an increase in the number of aspirants taking the CLAT.
a)
JFJJ
b)
JFFF
c)
JFII
d)
FJFJ
|
Ragini shah answered |
Understanding the Statements
The question presents four statements (A, B, C, D) and asks to determine which statement is justified (True) or not justified (False). The correct answer is option 'C', which indicates that statement C is Justified (J) and the others are not. Here's a breakdown:
Statement A: The 80/20 Principle
- This statement reflects the Pareto principle, suggesting that a small percentage of inputs (20%) leads to the majority (80%) of outputs.
- However, it lacks context or evidence, making it too generalized and not definitively true. Thus, it is considered False (F).
Statement B: Justice R Banumathi's Elevation
- This statement claims that Justice R Banumathi is the first woman judge from Tamil Nadu to be elevated to the Supreme Court.
- While it might be factually accurate, it does not provide any reasoning or implications of this elevation, leading to uncertainty about its justification. Hence, it is also considered False (F).
Statement C: Raman's Class Participation
- This statement connects Raman's habit of asking questions in class to his better understanding of concepts.
- It is a reasonable conclusion drawn from the premise, as active participation typically enhances learning outcomes. Thus, this statement is Justified (J).
Statement D: CLAT Online Participation
- This statement suggests uncertainty about whether taking the CLAT online will increase the number of aspirants.
- It lacks definitive evidence or reasoning to support the claim, making it ambiguous and therefore False (F).
Conclusion
- In summary, only statement C is justified based on the reasoning provided, while the others are either too generalized or lack supporting evidence. Thus, the correct answer is option 'C'.
The question presents four statements (A, B, C, D) and asks to determine which statement is justified (True) or not justified (False). The correct answer is option 'C', which indicates that statement C is Justified (J) and the others are not. Here's a breakdown:
Statement A: The 80/20 Principle
- This statement reflects the Pareto principle, suggesting that a small percentage of inputs (20%) leads to the majority (80%) of outputs.
- However, it lacks context or evidence, making it too generalized and not definitively true. Thus, it is considered False (F).
Statement B: Justice R Banumathi's Elevation
- This statement claims that Justice R Banumathi is the first woman judge from Tamil Nadu to be elevated to the Supreme Court.
- While it might be factually accurate, it does not provide any reasoning or implications of this elevation, leading to uncertainty about its justification. Hence, it is also considered False (F).
Statement C: Raman's Class Participation
- This statement connects Raman's habit of asking questions in class to his better understanding of concepts.
- It is a reasonable conclusion drawn from the premise, as active participation typically enhances learning outcomes. Thus, this statement is Justified (J).
Statement D: CLAT Online Participation
- This statement suggests uncertainty about whether taking the CLAT online will increase the number of aspirants.
- It lacks definitive evidence or reasoning to support the claim, making it ambiguous and therefore False (F).
Conclusion
- In summary, only statement C is justified based on the reasoning provided, while the others are either too generalized or lack supporting evidence. Thus, the correct answer is option 'C'.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
All those political prisoners were released on bail who had gone to jail for reasons other than political dharnas. Bail was not granted to persons involved in murders.
Conclusions:
I. No political prisoner had committed murder.
II. Some politicians were not arrested.- a)if conclusion I follows;
- b)if conclusion II follows;
- c)if both I and II follow;
- d)if either I or II follows; and
- e)if neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
All those political prisoners were released on bail who had gone to jail for reasons other than political dharnas. Bail was not granted to persons involved in murders.
Conclusions:
I. No political prisoner had committed murder.
II. Some politicians were not arrested.
Statement:
All those political prisoners were released on bail who had gone to jail for reasons other than political dharnas. Bail was not granted to persons involved in murders.
Conclusions:
I. No political prisoner had committed murder.
II. Some politicians were not arrested.
a)
if conclusion I follows;
b)
if conclusion II follows;
c)
if both I and II follow;
d)
if either I or II follows; and
e)
if neither I nor II follows.
|
Tejaswini nayar answered |
Explanation:
All those political prisoners were released on bail who had gone to jail for reasons other than political dharnas. Bail was not granted to persons involved in murders.
Conclusion I: No political prisoner had committed murder.
- The statement explicitly mentions that bail was not granted to persons involved in murders.
- Since political prisoners were released on bail for reasons other than political dharnas, it can be inferred that no political prisoner had committed murder.
- Therefore, Conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II: Some politicians were not arrested.
- The statement does not provide any information about politicians being arrested or not.
- The statement only talks about political prisoners being released on bail based on certain criteria.
- It is a leap to conclude that some politicians were not arrested based on the given information.
- Therefore, Conclusion II does not follow.
Therefore, the correct answer is option E. Conclusion I follows.
All those political prisoners were released on bail who had gone to jail for reasons other than political dharnas. Bail was not granted to persons involved in murders.
Conclusion I: No political prisoner had committed murder.
- The statement explicitly mentions that bail was not granted to persons involved in murders.
- Since political prisoners were released on bail for reasons other than political dharnas, it can be inferred that no political prisoner had committed murder.
- Therefore, Conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II: Some politicians were not arrested.
- The statement does not provide any information about politicians being arrested or not.
- The statement only talks about political prisoners being released on bail based on certain criteria.
- It is a leap to conclude that some politicians were not arrested based on the given information.
- Therefore, Conclusion II does not follow.
Therefore, the correct answer is option E. Conclusion I follows.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
The doctors nurse only those bleeding wounds which are caused by bullets. A patient X was bleeding profusely.
Conclusions:
I. X was nursed by the doctors.
II. The doctors did not nurse X.- a)if conclusion I follows;
- b)if conclusion II follows;
- c)if both I and II follow;
- d)if either I or II follows; and
- e)if neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
The doctors nurse only those bleeding wounds which are caused by bullets. A patient X was bleeding profusely.
Conclusions:
I. X was nursed by the doctors.
II. The doctors did not nurse X.
Statement:
The doctors nurse only those bleeding wounds which are caused by bullets. A patient X was bleeding profusely.
Conclusions:
I. X was nursed by the doctors.
II. The doctors did not nurse X.
a)
if conclusion I follows;
b)
if conclusion II follows;
c)
if both I and II follow;
d)
if either I or II follows; and
e)
if neither I nor II follows.
|
Dia Mehta answered |
Although no certain conclusion can be derived because it is not given whether X was hit by a bullet or not, yet one of the two conclusions must be true.
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.Partly because of bad weather, but also partly because some major pepper growers have switched to high-priced cocoa, world production of pepper has been running well below worldwide sales for three years. Pepper is consequently in relatively short supply. The price of pepper has soared in response: it now equals that of cocoa.Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?- a) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
- b) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the votes.
- c) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
- d) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
- e) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of two major parties.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Partly because of bad weather, but also partly because some major pepper growers have switched to high-priced cocoa, world production of pepper has been running well below worldwide sales for three years. Pepper is consequently in relatively short supply. The price of pepper has soared in response: it now equals that of cocoa.
Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
a)
If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
b)
If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the votes.
c)
A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
d)
The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
e)
The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of two major parties.
|
|
Subhashini Singh answered |
Understanding the Context
The passage discusses the decline in pepper production due to bad weather and shifts in agricultural focus, leading to a shortage and skyrocketing prices. This economic situation does not directly relate to the political implications of a third party, yet we can draw conclusions based on the nature of political movements.
Analyzing the Options
- Option A: This implies equal voter draw from the two major parties due to a compromise platform. However, this cannot be inferred as voters may not divide equally even if the platform is a compromise.
- Option B: Suggests that neither major party will capture more than half the votes if they were previously divided equally. This does not follow logically and is therefore not a strong inference.
- Option C: States that a third-party candidate won't attract new voters. This is too absolute and overlooks the potential for new voter engagement.
- Option D: Claims that the political stance of a third party will be more radical than either major party. This is valid as third parties often emerge from dissatisfaction with existing party options, typically bringing forth more progressive or extreme ideas.
- Option E: Suggests that founders of a third party will be former leaders of major parties. While this may happen, it is not a necessary inference as third parties can also arise from grassroots movements.
Conclusion
The correct inference is option D because it aligns with the common trend of third parties positioning themselves more radically to distinguish themselves from the established parties. This reflects the need for change and appeals to voters seeking alternatives to the status quo.
The passage discusses the decline in pepper production due to bad weather and shifts in agricultural focus, leading to a shortage and skyrocketing prices. This economic situation does not directly relate to the political implications of a third party, yet we can draw conclusions based on the nature of political movements.
Analyzing the Options
- Option A: This implies equal voter draw from the two major parties due to a compromise platform. However, this cannot be inferred as voters may not divide equally even if the platform is a compromise.
- Option B: Suggests that neither major party will capture more than half the votes if they were previously divided equally. This does not follow logically and is therefore not a strong inference.
- Option C: States that a third-party candidate won't attract new voters. This is too absolute and overlooks the potential for new voter engagement.
- Option D: Claims that the political stance of a third party will be more radical than either major party. This is valid as third parties often emerge from dissatisfaction with existing party options, typically bringing forth more progressive or extreme ideas.
- Option E: Suggests that founders of a third party will be former leaders of major parties. While this may happen, it is not a necessary inference as third parties can also arise from grassroots movements.
Conclusion
The correct inference is option D because it aligns with the common trend of third parties positioning themselves more radically to distinguish themselves from the established parties. This reflects the need for change and appeals to voters seeking alternatives to the status quo.
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.Statement: The police have arrested a suspect in connection with the robbery that took place last night.Inference:I. The police have enough evidence to prove that the arrested person committed the robbery.II. The robbery was a well-planned and organized crime.III. The police are taking steps to prevent such incidents from happening in the future.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only II follows
- c)If both I and III follow
- d)If both II and III follow
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The police have arrested a suspect in connection with the robbery that took place last night.
Inference:
I. The police have enough evidence to prove that the arrested person committed the robbery.
II. The robbery was a well-planned and organized crime.
III. The police are taking steps to prevent such incidents from happening in the future.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only II follows
c)
If both I and III follow
d)
If both II and III follow
|
Ssc Cgl answered |
The statement mentions that the police have arrested a suspect in connection with the robbery that took place last night. From this, it can be inferred that the police have enough evidence to prove that the arrested person committed the robbery. This is a logical inference from the given statement. Option II is incorrect as there is no mention of whether the robbery was well-planned and organized or not. Option III is also incorrect as there is no mention of whether the police are taking steps to prevent such incidents from happening in the future.
(A) Whether you make progress or not, the clock is ticking. So you might as well make the full utilization of the available time.
(B) High usage of electricity during festive time in the urban areas leads to perennial shortage of electricity in the rural areas
(C) Is not it ironical that in our country, we have to look both ways to cross a one-way road?.
(D) The Theseus’ paradox is a thought experiment that raises the question of whether an object which has had all its components replaced remains fundamentally the same object.- a)FFFF
- b)FJFJ
- c)FJIJ
- d)JIJF
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
(A) Whether you make progress or not, the clock is ticking. So you might as well make the full utilization of the available time.
(B) High usage of electricity during festive time in the urban areas leads to perennial shortage of electricity in the rural areas
(C) Is not it ironical that in our country, we have to look both ways to cross a one-way road?.
(D) The Theseus’ paradox is a thought experiment that raises the question of whether an object which has had all its components replaced remains fundamentally the same object.
(B) High usage of electricity during festive time in the urban areas leads to perennial shortage of electricity in the rural areas
(C) Is not it ironical that in our country, we have to look both ways to cross a one-way road?.
(D) The Theseus’ paradox is a thought experiment that raises the question of whether an object which has had all its components replaced remains fundamentally the same object.
a)
FFFF
b)
FJFJ
c)
FJIJ
d)
JIJF
|
Subhankar Gupta answered |
Ship paradox raises the question of whether a ship that has had all its parts replaced over time is still the same ship.
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.Statement: The government has announced a new policy that aims to promote the use of electric vehicles.Inference:I. The government is concerned about air pollution caused by traditional vehicles.II. The government wants to reduce the country’s dependence on fossil fuels.III. The government wants to promote the use of electric vehicles as they are more affordable than traditional vehicles.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only II follows
- c)If both I and II follow
- d)If both II and III follow
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The government has announced a new policy that aims to promote the use of electric vehicles.
Inference:
I. The government is concerned about air pollution caused by traditional vehicles.
II. The government wants to reduce the country’s dependence on fossil fuels.
III. The government wants to promote the use of electric vehicles as they are more affordable than traditional vehicles.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only II follows
c)
If both I and II follow
d)
If both II and III follow
|
Abhiram Mehra answered |
Understanding the Statement
The statement indicates that the government has introduced a new policy to promote electric vehicles (EVs). This action suggests a proactive approach towards a specific goal.
Analyzing the Inferences
1. Inference I: The government is concerned about air pollution caused by traditional vehicles.
- While promoting electric vehicles may indirectly imply a concern for air pollution, the statement does not explicitly state that pollution is the government’s primary motivation. Therefore, we cannot definitively conclude that this inference follows.
2. Inference II: The government wants to reduce the country’s dependence on fossil fuels.
- Promoting electric vehicles strongly correlates with the intention to decrease reliance on fossil fuels. This inference logically follows from the statement as electric vehicles typically utilize alternative energy sources, aligning with the goal of reducing fossil fuel dependence.
3. Inference III: The government wants to promote the use of electric vehicles as they are more affordable than traditional vehicles.
- The statement does not provide any information regarding the affordability of electric vehicles in comparison to traditional vehicles. Thus, we cannot accept this inference as it is not supported by the given statement.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- Only Inference II follows logically from the statement.
- Therefore, the correct answer is Option B: If only II follows.
This approach emphasizes the importance of direct correlation between the statement and the inferences drawn from it, ensuring clarity in understanding government policies and their implications.
The statement indicates that the government has introduced a new policy to promote electric vehicles (EVs). This action suggests a proactive approach towards a specific goal.
Analyzing the Inferences
1. Inference I: The government is concerned about air pollution caused by traditional vehicles.
- While promoting electric vehicles may indirectly imply a concern for air pollution, the statement does not explicitly state that pollution is the government’s primary motivation. Therefore, we cannot definitively conclude that this inference follows.
2. Inference II: The government wants to reduce the country’s dependence on fossil fuels.
- Promoting electric vehicles strongly correlates with the intention to decrease reliance on fossil fuels. This inference logically follows from the statement as electric vehicles typically utilize alternative energy sources, aligning with the goal of reducing fossil fuel dependence.
3. Inference III: The government wants to promote the use of electric vehicles as they are more affordable than traditional vehicles.
- The statement does not provide any information regarding the affordability of electric vehicles in comparison to traditional vehicles. Thus, we cannot accept this inference as it is not supported by the given statement.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- Only Inference II follows logically from the statement.
- Therefore, the correct answer is Option B: If only II follows.
This approach emphasizes the importance of direct correlation between the statement and the inferences drawn from it, ensuring clarity in understanding government policies and their implications.
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.Statement: The company announced a new policy to allow employees to work from home twice a week.Inference:I. The company wants to improve work-life balance for its employees.II. The company wants to reduce its office space and save costs.III. The company is experiencing high employee turnover due to the lack of work-life balance.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only II follows
- c)If both I and II follow
- d)If both II and III follow
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The company announced a new policy to allow employees to work from home twice a week.
Inference:
I. The company wants to improve work-life balance for its employees.
II. The company wants to reduce its office space and save costs.
III. The company is experiencing high employee turnover due to the lack of work-life balance.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only II follows
c)
If both I and II follow
d)
If both II and III follow
|
EduRev SSC CGL answered |
The statement mentions that the company has announced a new policy to allow employees to work from home twice a week. From this, it can be inferred that the company wants to provide a better work-life balance for its employees. Additionally, it can be inferred that the company wants to reduce its office space and save costs by allowing employees to work from home. Therefore, both options I and II are possible inferences from the statement. Option III is incorrect as there is no mention of employee turnover in the statement.
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.The owners of a local supermarket have decided to make use of three now-redundant check-out counters. They believe that they will attract those customers who have lately been put off by the long check-out lines during the mid-morning and evening rush hours. The owners have concluded that in order to be successful, the increased revenue from existing and added counters will have to be more than the increase in maintenance costs for the added counters.The underlying goal of the owners can be summarised thus:- a) To improve services to all customers
- b) To attract people who have never been to the store
- c) To make use of the redundant counters
- d) To keep maintenance costs on the added counters as low as possible.
- e) To increase monthly profits
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
The owners of a local supermarket have decided to make use of three now-redundant check-out counters. They believe that they will attract those customers who have lately been put off by the long check-out lines during the mid-morning and evening rush hours. The owners have concluded that in order to be successful, the increased revenue from existing and added counters will have to be more than the increase in maintenance costs for the added counters.
The underlying goal of the owners can be summarised thus:
a)
To improve services to all customers
b)
To attract people who have never been to the store
c)
To make use of the redundant counters
d)
To keep maintenance costs on the added counters as low as possible.
e)
To increase monthly profits
|
Aryan Khanna answered |
Services will be improved, it is hoped, for a certain segment of customers — those that shop during the rush hours — but not for all customers.
This fact makes choice (A) inappropriate. To attract new customers is not stated in the passage as an objective, so (B) is inappropriate. The utilisation of excess capacity, as in (C), is a useful by-product of the new system, but it is not the main goal. If maintenance costs are kept low it will probably make the achievement of the main goal that much easier, but this is not the major objective; so choice (D) is not appropriate. The principal purpose of the owners is to make more money from the change by increasing income by an amount worth more than the added costs.
Therefore, (E) is the appropriate answer.
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.If the wind is strong, kites are flown.If the sky is not clear, kites are not flown.If the temperature is high, kites are flown.Assume the statements above to be true. If kites are flown, which of the following statements must be true?I. The wind is strong.II. The sky is clear.III. The temperature is not high.- a) I only
- b) II only
- c) III only
- d) I and III only
- e) II and III only
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
If the wind is strong, kites are flown.
If the sky is not clear, kites are not flown.
If the temperature is high, kites are flown.
Assume the statements above to be true. If kites are flown, which of the following statements must be true?
I. The wind is strong.
II. The sky is clear.
III. The temperature is not high.
a)
I only
b)
II only
c)
III only
d)
I and III only
e)
II and III only
|
Eshaan Kapoor answered |
This is a problem involving deductive arguments. Assume that the initial statements are true. Then test each choice. It is not necessarily true. For example, even though it is true that when it is raining, there are clouds in the sky, you cannot conclude from the fact that there are clouds in the sky that it is raining. III makes the same error. II, however, is inferable. It’s like reasoning as follows: When there are no clouds in the sky, it is not raining. It is raining, therefore, there are clouds in the sky.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
Patients with minor ailments usually do not go to eminent doctors.
Conclusions:
I. Eminent doctors remain too busy with patients suffering from serious complications.
II. Their charges are rather high.- a)if conclusion I follows;
- b)if conclusion II follows;
- c)if both I and II follow;
- d)if either I or II follows; and
- e)if neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
Patients with minor ailments usually do not go to eminent doctors.
Conclusions:
I. Eminent doctors remain too busy with patients suffering from serious complications.
II. Their charges are rather high.
Statement:
Patients with minor ailments usually do not go to eminent doctors.
Conclusions:
I. Eminent doctors remain too busy with patients suffering from serious complications.
II. Their charges are rather high.
a)
if conclusion I follows;
b)
if conclusion II follows;
c)
if both I and II follow;
d)
if either I or II follows; and
e)
if neither I nor II follows.
|
|
Dia Mehta answered |
Only one of the two reasons mentioned could stop patients from going to eminent doctors.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
Parents are prepared to pay any price for the elite education of their children.
Conclusions:
I. All parents, these days, are very well-off.
II. Parents have an obsessive passion for a perfect development of their children through good schooling.- a)if conclusion I follows;
- b)if conclusion II follows;
- c)if both I and II follow;
- d)if either I or II follows; and
- e)if neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
Parents are prepared to pay any price for the elite education of their children.
Conclusions:
I. All parents, these days, are very well-off.
II. Parents have an obsessive passion for a perfect development of their children through good schooling.
Statement:
Parents are prepared to pay any price for the elite education of their children.
Conclusions:
I. All parents, these days, are very well-off.
II. Parents have an obsessive passion for a perfect development of their children through good schooling.
a)
if conclusion I follows;
b)
if conclusion II follows;
c)
if both I and II follow;
d)
if either I or II follows; and
e)
if neither I nor II follows.
|
|
Shiladitya menon answered |
Explanation:
Parents' Willingness to Pay for Elite Education
Parents' Financial Status:
- The statement does not mention that all parents are well-off financially. It simply states that parents are prepared to pay any price for elite education.
- Therefore, conclusion I, stating that all parents these days are very well-off, does not follow.
Parents' Motivation for Education:
- The statement implies that parents have an obsessive passion for the perfect development of their children through good schooling.
- Conclusion II, which states that parents have an obsessive passion for the perfect development of their children through good schooling, logically follows from the statement.
- Hence, conclusion II is the correct inference from the given statement.
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageIndia has signed two separate agreements with the USA and the EC.This brings to a satisfactory conclusion the Market Access Conciliations in textiles which had been in progress for some time. These discussions were held with a view to facilitating trade in textile products between India and the USA and EU countries. At present, more than two-thirds of India’s total textile exports go to these countries. These agreements which came into force from Dec. 31, 1994, prior to the establishment of the WTO, provide very significant additional market access in these two major markets (USA and EU) for Indian textile products. In particular, the agreements are expected to provide a fillip to handloom and powerloom production and exports which are of high priority because of their direct linkage with employment generation.India will have to abide by certain quality standards to continue getting export orders from these countries.- a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
- b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
- c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
- d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
- e) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.
Passage
India has signed two separate agreements with the USA and the EC.
This brings to a satisfactory conclusion the Market Access Conciliations in textiles which had been in progress for some time. These discussions were held with a view to facilitating trade in textile products between India and the USA and EU countries. At present, more than two-thirds of India’s total textile exports go to these countries. These agreements which came into force from Dec. 31, 1994, prior to the establishment of the WTO, provide very significant additional market access in these two major markets (USA and EU) for Indian textile products. In particular, the agreements are expected to provide a fillip to handloom and powerloom production and exports which are of high priority because of their direct linkage with employment generation.
India will have to abide by certain quality standards to continue getting export orders from these countries.
a)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
b)
if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
c)
if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
d)
if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
e)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
|
|
Arindam Verma answered |
Analysis:
India has signed agreements with the USA and EC for facilitating trade in textile products, with a focus on market access.
Inference:
India will have to abide by certain quality standards to continue getting export orders from these countries.
1. Evidence from the passage: The passage mentions that the agreements provide significant additional market access for Indian textile products in the USA and EU markets.
2. Evaluation: While the passage does not explicitly mention quality standards, it can be inferred that in order to enhance trade relations and increase market access, India may need to meet certain quality standards set by the USA and EU.
3. Conclusion: Therefore, it can be inferred that India will likely have to abide by certain quality standards to continue receiving export orders from these countries.
Verdict: The inference is 'probably true' though not definitely true in the light of the facts given.
India has signed agreements with the USA and EC for facilitating trade in textile products, with a focus on market access.
Inference:
India will have to abide by certain quality standards to continue getting export orders from these countries.
1. Evidence from the passage: The passage mentions that the agreements provide significant additional market access for Indian textile products in the USA and EU markets.
2. Evaluation: While the passage does not explicitly mention quality standards, it can be inferred that in order to enhance trade relations and increase market access, India may need to meet certain quality standards set by the USA and EU.
3. Conclusion: Therefore, it can be inferred that India will likely have to abide by certain quality standards to continue receiving export orders from these countries.
Verdict: The inference is 'probably true' though not definitely true in the light of the facts given.
(A) An apple a day, keep the doctor away.
(B) Be the change you wish to see in the world.
(C) Without music, life would be a mistake.
(D) A room without books is like a body without soul- a)IJJJ
- b)FJJJ
- c)JJJJ
- d)FJFJ
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
(A) An apple a day, keep the doctor away.
(B) Be the change you wish to see in the world.
(C) Without music, life would be a mistake.
(D) A room without books is like a body without soul
(B) Be the change you wish to see in the world.
(C) Without music, life would be a mistake.
(D) A room without books is like a body without soul
a)
IJJJ
b)
FJJJ
c)
JJJJ
d)
FJFJ
|
Amrita menon answered |
Explanation:
Interpreting the Statements:
- Statement (A) suggests that eating an apple daily can help maintain good health and prevent the need to visit the doctor frequently.
- Statement (B) encourages individuals to initiate the change they desire to witness in the world.
- Statement (C) emphasizes the significance of music in enriching and enhancing life.
- Statement (D) draws a comparison between a room devoid of books and a body lacking a soul, implying that books are essential for nourishing the mind and spirit.
Matching the Statements:
- The common theme among all the statements is the idea of making choices or engaging in activities that have positive effects on one's well-being or the world around them.
- Among the given options, option (A) is the only one that aligns with this theme as it promotes a healthy habit that can potentially prevent illness and promote well-being.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' (IJJJ), as it reflects the shared message of taking actions that contribute to a better quality of life.
(A) Gold jewellery and coins exports jumped 22% in April–September.
(B) You have to work harder to crack examinations like the CLAT.
(C) Usain Bolt is such a fast runner that he may even defeat the fastest land animal on Earth someday.
(D) Due to the collapse of the bridge, villagers are facing a big problem of travelling to the town.- a)FJFI
- b)JFIJ
- c)FJJI
- d)FFJJ
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
(A) Gold jewellery and coins exports jumped 22% in April–September.
(B) You have to work harder to crack examinations like the CLAT.
(C) Usain Bolt is such a fast runner that he may even defeat the fastest land animal on Earth someday.
(D) Due to the collapse of the bridge, villagers are facing a big problem of travelling to the town.
(B) You have to work harder to crack examinations like the CLAT.
(C) Usain Bolt is such a fast runner that he may even defeat the fastest land animal on Earth someday.
(D) Due to the collapse of the bridge, villagers are facing a big problem of travelling to the town.
a)
FJFI
b)
JFIJ
c)
FJJI
d)
FFJJ
|
|
Dia Mehta answered |
F – The statement provides a statistic which can be independently verified.
J – This is an opinion which people may or may not agree with.
J – This is only an opinion on the running abilities of Usain Bolt. It cannot be verified independently.
I – ‘Collapse of the bridge’ is the fact on the basis of which inference is drawn on ‘villagers facing the problem of travelling to the town’.
J – This is an opinion which people may or may not agree with.
J – This is only an opinion on the running abilities of Usain Bolt. It cannot be verified independently.
I – ‘Collapse of the bridge’ is the fact on the basis of which inference is drawn on ‘villagers facing the problem of travelling to the town’.
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe first time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the story bewitched me. The second time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the special effects amazed me. The third time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the photography dazzled me. Have you ever seen a movie twice, three times? You notice subtleties and hear sounds you completely missed the first time around.It’s the same on the phone. Because your business conversations are more consequential than movies, you should listen to them two, maybe three times, Often, we have no clear idea of what really happened in our phone conversation until we hear it again. You’ll find shadings more significant than the colour of Toto’s collar- and more scarecrows than you imagined who ‘haven’t got a brain!’ How do you listen to your important business conversa- tions again?Simply legally and ethically tape-record them. I call the technique of recording and analysing your business conversations for subtleties Instant Replay.The advice is being given to the sales team.- a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
- b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
- c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
- d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
- e) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.
Passage
The first time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the story bewitched me. The second time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the special effects amazed me. The third time I saw The Wizard of Oz, the photography dazzled me. Have you ever seen a movie twice, three times? You notice subtleties and hear sounds you completely missed the first time around.
It’s the same on the phone. Because your business conversations are more consequential than movies, you should listen to them two, maybe three times, Often, we have no clear idea of what really happened in our phone conversation until we hear it again. You’ll find shadings more significant than the colour of Toto’s collar- and more scarecrows than you imagined who ‘haven’t got a brain!’ How do you listen to your important business conversa- tions again?
Simply legally and ethically tape-record them. I call the technique of recording and analysing your business conversations for subtleties Instant Replay.
The advice is being given to the sales team.
a)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
b)
if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
c)
if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
d)
if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
e)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
|
Rhea patil answered |
Understanding the Passage
The passage discusses the speaker's experience of watching "The Wizard of Oz" multiple times and how it enhances understanding. It then draws a parallel to listening to business conversations, suggesting that replaying them can reveal important subtleties.
Analyzing the Inference
The inference in question suggests that the advice given is directed specifically at the sales team. However, the passage does not explicitly state that this advice is limited to them. Instead, it refers to "business conversations" in general.
Reasons for Choosing "C" - Data Inadequate
- General Application: The phrase "business conversations" implies that the advice can apply to anyone engaged in business, not just the sales team.
- Lack of Specificity: The passage lacks specific details indicating that the advice is exclusively for the sales team, making it uncertain.
- Broader Relevance: Other professionals in various sectors could benefit from recording and analyzing their conversations, suggesting a wider audience for the advice.
Conclusion
Given the information presented in the passage, it is not possible to definitively conclude that the advice is specifically for the sales team. Thus, the correct option is "C," indicating that the data are inadequate to determine the truth of the inference.
The passage discusses the speaker's experience of watching "The Wizard of Oz" multiple times and how it enhances understanding. It then draws a parallel to listening to business conversations, suggesting that replaying them can reveal important subtleties.
Analyzing the Inference
The inference in question suggests that the advice given is directed specifically at the sales team. However, the passage does not explicitly state that this advice is limited to them. Instead, it refers to "business conversations" in general.
Reasons for Choosing "C" - Data Inadequate
- General Application: The phrase "business conversations" implies that the advice can apply to anyone engaged in business, not just the sales team.
- Lack of Specificity: The passage lacks specific details indicating that the advice is exclusively for the sales team, making it uncertain.
- Broader Relevance: Other professionals in various sectors could benefit from recording and analyzing their conversations, suggesting a wider audience for the advice.
Conclusion
Given the information presented in the passage, it is not possible to definitively conclude that the advice is specifically for the sales team. Thus, the correct option is "C," indicating that the data are inadequate to determine the truth of the inference.
(A) The 236 run partnership between Sachin and Rahul played a major role in propelling India towards victory.
(B) Sachin Tendulkar has scored 18426 runs in One Day Internationals (ODIs) and 15921 runs in Tests.
(C) Sachin Tendulkar is the greatest batsmen ever.
(D) Though Yuvraj played a major role in helping India grab the inaugural T20 World Cup, India could have won the tournament even without his help.- a)JJJJ
- b)FFJJ
- c)IFJJ
- d)JFJF
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
(A) The 236 run partnership between Sachin and Rahul played a major role in propelling India towards victory.
(B) Sachin Tendulkar has scored 18426 runs in One Day Internationals (ODIs) and 15921 runs in Tests.
(C) Sachin Tendulkar is the greatest batsmen ever.
(D) Though Yuvraj played a major role in helping India grab the inaugural T20 World Cup, India could have won the tournament even without his help.
(B) Sachin Tendulkar has scored 18426 runs in One Day Internationals (ODIs) and 15921 runs in Tests.
(C) Sachin Tendulkar is the greatest batsmen ever.
(D) Though Yuvraj played a major role in helping India grab the inaugural T20 World Cup, India could have won the tournament even without his help.
a)
JJJJ
b)
FFJJ
c)
IFJJ
d)
JFJF
|
|
Eshaan Kapoor answered |
I – The ‘236-run partnership’ is a fact whereas ‘major role in propelling . . .’ is an inference.
F – This is a verifiable fact.
J – ‘Greatest batsmen’ is an opinion on which people may agree or disagree. Thus, this is a judgment.
J – ‘India could have won the tournament even without his help’ is only an opinion.
F – This is a verifiable fact.
J – ‘Greatest batsmen’ is an opinion on which people may agree or disagree. Thus, this is a judgment.
J – ‘India could have won the tournament even without his help’ is only an opinion.
According to Goleman, the "Management of Emotions" component of Emotional intelligence includes(a) Handling feelings, so that they are appropriate.(b) Ability to soothe oneself.(c) Ability to shake off rampant anxiety, gloom, or irritability.(d) Recognising feeling as it happens.Choose the correct option - a)(a), (b) and (d) only
- b)(b), (c) and (d) only
- c)(a), (b) and (C) only
- d)(a), (b), (c) and (d)
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
According to Goleman, the "Management of Emotions" component of Emotional intelligence includes
(a) Handling feelings, so that they are appropriate.
(b) Ability to soothe oneself.
(c) Ability to shake off rampant anxiety, gloom, or irritability.
(d) Recognising feeling as it happens.
Choose the correct option
a)
(a), (b) and (d) only
b)
(b), (c) and (d) only
c)
(a), (b) and (C) only
d)
(a), (b), (c) and (d)
|
Arnav Saini answered |
Understanding Goleman's "Management of Emotions"
The "Management of Emotions" component of Emotional Intelligence (EI) is essential for personal and professional success. Goleman identifies several key abilities that fall under this category.
Key Components of Emotion Management:
- Handling Feelings Appropriately:
This involves regulating emotions to ensure they are suitable for the situation. This means not letting emotions dictate actions but rather managing them effectively.
- Ability to Soothe Oneself:
This refers to the capacity to calm oneself in times of stress or emotional upheaval. It's crucial for maintaining composure and clarity.
- Ability to Shake Off Negative Emotions:
The ability to move past feelings of anxiety, gloom, or irritability is vital. This skill helps individuals maintain a positive mindset and focus on solutions rather than problems.
- Recognizing Feelings as They Happen:
Being aware of one’s emotions in real-time is critical for effective emotion management. This self-awareness allows for timely responses instead of reactive ones.
Why Option C is Correct:
Option C includes:
- (a) Handling feelings, so that they are appropriate.
- (b) Ability to soothe oneself.
- (c) Ability to shake off rampant anxiety, gloom, or irritability.
These three abilities collectively emphasize the importance of managing emotions effectively, which is central to Goleman's concept of emotional intelligence. Option C does not include (d) recognizing feelings as it happens, which is more aligned with emotional awareness rather than management. Thus, it is correct to state that effective emotion management focuses on handling, soothing, and overcoming negative emotions, encapsulated by options (a), (b), and (c).
The "Management of Emotions" component of Emotional Intelligence (EI) is essential for personal and professional success. Goleman identifies several key abilities that fall under this category.
Key Components of Emotion Management:
- Handling Feelings Appropriately:
This involves regulating emotions to ensure they are suitable for the situation. This means not letting emotions dictate actions but rather managing them effectively.
- Ability to Soothe Oneself:
This refers to the capacity to calm oneself in times of stress or emotional upheaval. It's crucial for maintaining composure and clarity.
- Ability to Shake Off Negative Emotions:
The ability to move past feelings of anxiety, gloom, or irritability is vital. This skill helps individuals maintain a positive mindset and focus on solutions rather than problems.
- Recognizing Feelings as They Happen:
Being aware of one’s emotions in real-time is critical for effective emotion management. This self-awareness allows for timely responses instead of reactive ones.
Why Option C is Correct:
Option C includes:
- (a) Handling feelings, so that they are appropriate.
- (b) Ability to soothe oneself.
- (c) Ability to shake off rampant anxiety, gloom, or irritability.
These three abilities collectively emphasize the importance of managing emotions effectively, which is central to Goleman's concept of emotional intelligence. Option C does not include (d) recognizing feelings as it happens, which is more aligned with emotional awareness rather than management. Thus, it is correct to state that effective emotion management focuses on handling, soothing, and overcoming negative emotions, encapsulated by options (a), (b), and (c).
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.Statement: The city council has approved a new law prohibiting smoking in public parks.Inference:I. The city council believes that smoking in public parks is harmful to the environment.II. The new law will make it illegal to smoke in public parks.III. The city council is trying to promote healthy habits among its citizens.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only III follows
- c)If both I and III follow
- d)If both II and III follow
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The city council has approved a new law prohibiting smoking in public parks.
Inference:
I. The city council believes that smoking in public parks is harmful to the environment.
II. The new law will make it illegal to smoke in public parks.
III. The city council is trying to promote healthy habits among its citizens.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only III follows
c)
If both I and III follow
d)
If both II and III follow
|
Pranab Goyal answered |
Understanding the Statement
The statement indicates that the city council has enacted a law against smoking in public parks. This suggests a deliberate action taken by the council to address a specific issue.
Evaluating the Inferences
Now, let’s analyze each inference based on the statement provided.
Conclusion
From the analysis:
- Inference I does not follow as it makes an assumption about the council's beliefs.
- Inference II is valid as it directly follows from the statement.
- Inference III is plausible and can be interpreted as a goal of the law.
However, the question specifically asks which follows, leading us to conclude that option B, which states only III follows, is the correct answer.
The statement indicates that the city council has enacted a law against smoking in public parks. This suggests a deliberate action taken by the council to address a specific issue.
Evaluating the Inferences
Now, let’s analyze each inference based on the statement provided.
- Inference I: The city council believes that smoking in public parks is harmful to the environment.
- Inference II: The new law will make it illegal to smoke in public parks.
- Inference III: The city council is trying to promote healthy habits among its citizens.
This assertion may seem logical, but the statement does not explicitly mention the council’s reasoning or beliefs. Therefore, we cannot conclusively draw this inference.
This inference is directly supported by the statement. Since the council has approved a law prohibiting smoking, it clearly indicates that smoking in public parks will be illegal.
This inference can be drawn as a possible motive behind the law. The council may aim to encourage healthier lifestyles by restricting smoking in public areas, thus promoting the welfare of citizens.
Conclusion
From the analysis:
- Inference I does not follow as it makes an assumption about the council's beliefs.
- Inference II is valid as it directly follows from the statement.
- Inference III is plausible and can be interpreted as a goal of the law.
However, the question specifically asks which follows, leading us to conclude that option B, which states only III follows, is the correct answer.
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe country has taken a major initiative by introducing convertibility of the Rupee on the current account. It has also been declared that the ultimate goal is to make the Rupee fully convertible. These are signs of the country’s achieving economic maturity. India is now ready to welcome foreign capital. It is preparing to reduce import tariffs to levels which are currently the norm in other developing countries. All these measures show that India is today mature and strong enough to face international competition and to integrate itself successfully with the global economy. The country is ready to shed its ideological inhibitions and ready to evaluate the international economic environment in a pragmatic spirit.Socialistic ideals prevented India from evaluating the international economic environment in a pragmatic spirit.- a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
- b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
- c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
- d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
- e) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.
Passage
The country has taken a major initiative by introducing convertibility of the Rupee on the current account. It has also been declared that the ultimate goal is to make the Rupee fully convertible. These are signs of the country’s achieving economic maturity. India is now ready to welcome foreign capital. It is preparing to reduce import tariffs to levels which are currently the norm in other developing countries. All these measures show that India is today mature and strong enough to face international competition and to integrate itself successfully with the global economy. The country is ready to shed its ideological inhibitions and ready to evaluate the international economic environment in a pragmatic spirit.
Socialistic ideals prevented India from evaluating the international economic environment in a pragmatic spirit.
a)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
b)
if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
c)
if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
d)
if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
e)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
|
|
Eshaan Kapoor answered |
Probably true. The last sentence says: India is ready to shed its ideological inhibitions and evaluate the international economic environment in a pragmatic spirit. We know that before the age of convertibility India was governed by socialistic ideals. So, it is likely that the ideological inhibitions referred to in the passage mean the socialistic ideals. Hence, the given inference appears likely to be true.
(A) The Tiger Point offers the most breathtaking view of the mountains in Lonavala.
(B) Statistically, girls get better marks in examinations than boys. However, the same statistics show that boys get more opportunities than girls in the corporate world to succeed.
(C) Making promises is easy. Keeping them is the hardest part.
(D) We buy things we do not need with money we do not have to impress people we do not like.- a)FJFJ
- b)JFII
- c)FJFI
- d)JFJJ
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
(A) The Tiger Point offers the most breathtaking view of the mountains in Lonavala.
(B) Statistically, girls get better marks in examinations than boys. However, the same statistics show that boys get more opportunities than girls in the corporate world to succeed.
(C) Making promises is easy. Keeping them is the hardest part.
(D) We buy things we do not need with money we do not have to impress people we do not like.
(B) Statistically, girls get better marks in examinations than boys. However, the same statistics show that boys get more opportunities than girls in the corporate world to succeed.
(C) Making promises is easy. Keeping them is the hardest part.
(D) We buy things we do not need with money we do not have to impress people we do not like.
a)
FJFJ
b)
JFII
c)
FJFI
d)
JFJJ
|
|
Aryan Khanna answered |
J – This is only an individual opinion.
F – They have talked about statistics. Thus, this is a fact.
J – This is only an individual opinion.
J – This is only an individual opinion.
F – They have talked about statistics. Thus, this is a fact.
J – This is only an individual opinion.
J – This is only an individual opinion.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.
Conclusions:
I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.
II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.- a)if conclusion I follows;
- b)if conclusion II follows;
- c)if both I and II follow;
- d)if either I or II follows; and
- e)if neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.
Conclusions:
I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.
II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.
Statement:
Inspite of the claim of the government that terrorism is under check, killing continues.
Conclusions:
I. The terrorists have not come to an understanding with the government.
II. The government has been constantly telling a lie.
a)
if conclusion I follows;
b)
if conclusion II follows;
c)
if both I and II follow;
d)
if either I or II follows; and
e)
if neither I nor II follows.
|
|
Eshaan Kapoor answered |
Both conclusions are correct. Killing continues, means the first conclusion is valid. Killing continues while the government says that terrorists are in check, means that the second is valid.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
Smoking is one of those human weaknesses which tends to test the will-power of the smoker to the edge.
Conclusions:
I. It is very difficult for the smokers to give up smoking even if they want to do so.
II. Human beings have other weaknesses as well.- a)if conclusion I follows;
- b)if conclusion II follows;
- c)if both I and II follow;
- d)if either I or II follows; and
- e)if neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
Smoking is one of those human weaknesses which tends to test the will-power of the smoker to the edge.
Conclusions:
I. It is very difficult for the smokers to give up smoking even if they want to do so.
II. Human beings have other weaknesses as well.
Statement:
Smoking is one of those human weaknesses which tends to test the will-power of the smoker to the edge.
Conclusions:
I. It is very difficult for the smokers to give up smoking even if they want to do so.
II. Human beings have other weaknesses as well.
a)
if conclusion I follows;
b)
if conclusion II follows;
c)
if both I and II follow;
d)
if either I or II follows; and
e)
if neither I nor II follows.
|
|
Eshaan Kapoor answered |
The first conclusion is obviously correct. The second is also correct because the statement talks of human ‘weaknesses’ and not just a single weakness.
Those in the business community who decry government regulation claim that it increases the costs of doing business and reduces beneficial competition, ultimately harming both business and the community as a whole. They point to industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, in which deregulation has apparently brought greater economic efficiency. These commentators ignore the industries, such as financial services, in which government regulation is essential; indeed, without government intervention in the 1930s, some whole segments of that industry might have permanently collapsed.The author’s point is made primarily by- a) offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents’ argument
- b) calling into question the motives of his opponents
- c) pointing out an inconsistency in his opponents’ use of terms
- d) drawing a distinction between valid and invalid methods of argument
- e) underscoring the subjectivity of his opponents’ basic assumptions
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Those in the business community who decry government regulation claim that it increases the costs of doing business and reduces beneficial competition, ultimately harming both business and the community as a whole. They point to industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, in which deregulation has apparently brought greater economic efficiency. These commentators ignore the industries, such as financial services, in which government regulation is essential; indeed, without government intervention in the 1930s, some whole segments of that industry might have permanently collapsed.
The author’s point is made primarily by
a)
offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents’ argument
b)
calling into question the motives of his opponents
c)
pointing out an inconsistency in his opponents’ use of terms
d)
drawing a distinction between valid and invalid methods of argument
e)
underscoring the subjectivity of his opponents’ basic assumptions
|
Nikhila desai answered |
Counter-example to Rebut Opponents' Argument
The author's primary point is made by offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents' argument. By pointing out industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, where deregulation has seemingly brought greater economic efficiency, the author is highlighting that there are indeed cases where government regulation may impede progress. However, the author goes on to mention industries like financial services, where government intervention in the form of regulation is essential for stability and protection.
Importance of Government Regulation in Financial Services
The author underscores the crucial role of government regulation in the financial services industry, citing the example of government intervention in the 1930s that prevented some segments of the industry from collapsing permanently. This highlights the necessity of regulatory measures to ensure the integrity and stability of sectors that are vital to the economy.
Ignoring Essential Regulatory Measures
The author also criticizes those in the business community who decry government regulation, pointing out that they often overlook the industries where regulation is essential for the well-being of both businesses and the community as a whole. By drawing attention to this oversight, the author challenges the blanket dismissal of government intervention in all industries.
In conclusion, the author effectively makes his point by offering a nuanced perspective that acknowledges the benefits of deregulation in some sectors while emphasizing the critical need for government regulation in others. This approach highlights the complexity of the issue and calls for a more balanced consideration of the role of regulation in fostering economic growth and stability.
The author's primary point is made by offering a counter-example to rebut his opponents' argument. By pointing out industries such as trucking, airlines, and telecommunications, where deregulation has seemingly brought greater economic efficiency, the author is highlighting that there are indeed cases where government regulation may impede progress. However, the author goes on to mention industries like financial services, where government intervention in the form of regulation is essential for stability and protection.
Importance of Government Regulation in Financial Services
The author underscores the crucial role of government regulation in the financial services industry, citing the example of government intervention in the 1930s that prevented some segments of the industry from collapsing permanently. This highlights the necessity of regulatory measures to ensure the integrity and stability of sectors that are vital to the economy.
Ignoring Essential Regulatory Measures
The author also criticizes those in the business community who decry government regulation, pointing out that they often overlook the industries where regulation is essential for the well-being of both businesses and the community as a whole. By drawing attention to this oversight, the author challenges the blanket dismissal of government intervention in all industries.
In conclusion, the author effectively makes his point by offering a nuanced perspective that acknowledges the benefits of deregulation in some sectors while emphasizing the critical need for government regulation in others. This approach highlights the complexity of the issue and calls for a more balanced consideration of the role of regulation in fostering economic growth and stability.
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.Pioneers of the motor-car industry realised that if they were going to meet the growing demand for their product, they had to adapt the labour force used in the productive process. Instead of many men working to complete all the stages of one car at a time, they assigned defined tasks to each man which they would repeat on every car.Which of the following can be concluded from the passage?- a) Early motor-car manufacturers intended to increase productivity by applying the principle of division of labour.
- b) The car workers became disgruntled because they were assigned monotonous, repetitive tasks on the assembly line.
- c) Economies of scale enabled early motor companies to expand.
- d) A bad worker would perform the same task badly on each car leading to many more rejects.
- e) The new production process enabled certain car workers to become specialists in the part of the process to which they were assigned.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Pioneers of the motor-car industry realised that if they were going to meet the growing demand for their product, they had to adapt the labour force used in the productive process. Instead of many men working to complete all the stages of one car at a time, they assigned defined tasks to each man which they would repeat on every car.
Which of the following can be concluded from the passage?
a)
Early motor-car manufacturers intended to increase productivity by applying the principle of division of labour.
b)
The car workers became disgruntled because they were assigned monotonous, repetitive tasks on the assembly line.
c)
Economies of scale enabled early motor companies to expand.
d)
A bad worker would perform the same task badly on each car leading to many more rejects.
e)
The new production process enabled certain car workers to become specialists in the part of the process to which they were assigned.
|
Anuj Menon answered |
Analysis:
Division of labour:
- The passage mentions that early motor-car manufacturers realised the need to adapt the labour force by assigning defined tasks to each worker.
- This practice of assigning specific tasks to each worker is known as the division of labour.
Conclusion:
- Therefore, it can be concluded that early motor-car manufacturers intended to increase productivity by applying the principle of division of labour.
Division of labour:
- The passage mentions that early motor-car manufacturers realised the need to adapt the labour force by assigning defined tasks to each worker.
- This practice of assigning specific tasks to each worker is known as the division of labour.
Conclusion:
- Therefore, it can be concluded that early motor-car manufacturers intended to increase productivity by applying the principle of division of labour.
(A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources
(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.
(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.
(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.- a)IJIJ
- b)IFIF
- c)IFIJ
- d)JJJJ
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
(A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources
(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.
(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.
(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.
(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.
(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.
(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.
a)
IJIJ
b)
IFIF
c)
IFIJ
d)
JJJJ
|
Megha dasgupta answered |
Explanation:
Given Statements:
(A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources
(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.
(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.
(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.
Analysis:
- Statement (A) talks about the potential benefits of Narendra Modi's 'Smart Cities' vision.
- Statement (B) mentions a historical event, the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.
- Statement (C) states a general fact about earthquakes causing geographical changes.
- Statement (D) makes a claim about a specific boy being the most intelligent in the class.
Logical Connection:
- Among the given statements, only statement (C) directly talks about a cause and effect relationship. Earthquakes are known to cause geographical changes due to the shifting of tectonic plates and other factors. This makes statement (C) the most logical choice.
- Statements (A), (B), and (D) do not establish a cause and effect relationship in the same clear and direct manner as statement (C) does.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
Option C) IFIJ
Given Statements:
(A) Narendra Modi’s vision of ‘Smart Cities’ will certainly lead to more inclusive growth and better allocation of resources
(B) The Berlin Wall fell on November 9th, 1989 as the Cold War began to thaw across Europe.
(C) If there is an Earthquake, it is bound to make some geographical changes in the area.
(D) He is the most intelligent boy in the class.
Analysis:
- Statement (A) talks about the potential benefits of Narendra Modi's 'Smart Cities' vision.
- Statement (B) mentions a historical event, the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.
- Statement (C) states a general fact about earthquakes causing geographical changes.
- Statement (D) makes a claim about a specific boy being the most intelligent in the class.
Logical Connection:
- Among the given statements, only statement (C) directly talks about a cause and effect relationship. Earthquakes are known to cause geographical changes due to the shifting of tectonic plates and other factors. This makes statement (C) the most logical choice.
- Statements (A), (B), and (D) do not establish a cause and effect relationship in the same clear and direct manner as statement (C) does.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
Option C) IFIJ
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.Statement: The government has announced a new tax policy that will increase taxes on luxury goods.Inference:I. The government wants to discourage people from buying luxury goods.II. The government wants to generate more revenue through taxes.III. The government is trying to address income inequality by targeting luxury goods.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only II follows
- c)If both I and II follow
- d)If both II and III follow
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The government has announced a new tax policy that will increase taxes on luxury goods.
Inference:
I. The government wants to discourage people from buying luxury goods.
II. The government wants to generate more revenue through taxes.
III. The government is trying to address income inequality by targeting luxury goods.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only II follows
c)
If both I and II follow
d)
If both II and III follow
|
|
Arnav Saini answered |
Understanding the Statement
The statement indicates that the government is implementing a new tax policy aimed at increasing taxes on luxury goods. This suggests a deliberate action by the government to influence consumer behavior and revenue generation.
Analyzing the Inferences
1. Inference I: The government wants to discourage people from buying luxury goods.
- This inference is plausible. By increasing taxes on luxury items, the government may aim to make them less attractive to consumers. However, discouraging purchases is not explicitly stated as a goal in the statement; thus, it is not a definitive inference.
2. Inference II: The government wants to generate more revenue through taxes.
- This inference is directly supported by the statement. Increasing taxes typically aims to boost government revenue, making this a clear and valid conclusion based on the information provided.
3. Inference III: The government is trying to address income inequality by targeting luxury goods.
- While addressing income inequality could be a potential outcome, the statement does not explicitly mention this as a goal. Therefore, this inference cannot be conclusively drawn from the given statement.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- Only Inference II (the government wants to generate more revenue through taxes) is a strong conclusion from the statement.
- Inference I and III, while they have merit, are not definitively supported by the statement.
Thus, the correct answer is option B: If only II follows.
The statement indicates that the government is implementing a new tax policy aimed at increasing taxes on luxury goods. This suggests a deliberate action by the government to influence consumer behavior and revenue generation.
Analyzing the Inferences
1. Inference I: The government wants to discourage people from buying luxury goods.
- This inference is plausible. By increasing taxes on luxury items, the government may aim to make them less attractive to consumers. However, discouraging purchases is not explicitly stated as a goal in the statement; thus, it is not a definitive inference.
2. Inference II: The government wants to generate more revenue through taxes.
- This inference is directly supported by the statement. Increasing taxes typically aims to boost government revenue, making this a clear and valid conclusion based on the information provided.
3. Inference III: The government is trying to address income inequality by targeting luxury goods.
- While addressing income inequality could be a potential outcome, the statement does not explicitly mention this as a goal. Therefore, this inference cannot be conclusively drawn from the given statement.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- Only Inference II (the government wants to generate more revenue through taxes) is a strong conclusion from the statement.
- Inference I and III, while they have merit, are not definitively supported by the statement.
Thus, the correct answer is option B: If only II follows.
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageIndia and other developing countries, while expressing their commitment to the upgradation of labour standards, have been resisting the move to link international trade, not only with labour standards, but also with environmental concerns and human rights. The move was set afoot on the successful conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations with a proposal for the inclusion of a social clause in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which succeeds GATT. Later, on stiff opposition to the move on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade, a proposal was mooted for the inclusion of a social clause in ILO.India claims that environmental issue and trade are uncorrelated.- a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
- b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
- c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
- d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
- e) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.
Passage
India and other developing countries, while expressing their commitment to the upgradation of labour standards, have been resisting the move to link international trade, not only with labour standards, but also with environmental concerns and human rights. The move was set afoot on the successful conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations with a proposal for the inclusion of a social clause in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which succeeds GATT. Later, on stiff opposition to the move on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade, a proposal was mooted for the inclusion of a social clause in ILO.
India claims that environmental issue and trade are uncorrelated.
a)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
b)
if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
c)
if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
d)
if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
e)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
|
|
Aryan Khanna answered |
Probably true. The last sentence says that there was stiff opposition to the efforts on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade.
The first sentence says that India is opposing the efforts. So, it is likely that Indian ground of resistance is also the same (i.e., the issues such as labour standards, environmental concerns, human rights etc. are not related with trade).
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageAsia has become the growth centre of the world economy in recent years.Within the region, India and South Korea are the third and fourth largest economies after China and Japan. Though the Asian growth stories mainly revolve around India and China, South Korea has remained a key player for these countries as one of their major trading and investment partners. South Korea adopted outward-oriented economic policies with the beginning of its first five-year economic development plan in 1962, which resulted in high growth and the integration of the Korean economy with the rest of the world. Subsequently, high and consistent economic growth made South Korea one of the high-income economies in Asia. Korea is still growing at a faster rate compared to other developed economies. India on the other hand adopted an import substitution policy since its Independence until the early 1990s. Since then India has introduced wide-ranging economic policy reforms and is moving towards a market-driven economy. This has resulted in consistent high economic growth over the last one-and-a-half decades.India and China together are considered to be the driving force of the Asian economy.- a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
- b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
- c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
- d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
- e) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.
Passage
Asia has become the growth centre of the world economy in recent years.
Within the region, India and South Korea are the third and fourth largest economies after China and Japan. Though the Asian growth stories mainly revolve around India and China, South Korea has remained a key player for these countries as one of their major trading and investment partners. South Korea adopted outward-oriented economic policies with the beginning of its first five-year economic development plan in 1962, which resulted in high growth and the integration of the Korean economy with the rest of the world. Subsequently, high and consistent economic growth made South Korea one of the high-income economies in Asia. Korea is still growing at a faster rate compared to other developed economies. India on the other hand adopted an import substitution policy since its Independence until the early 1990s. Since then India has introduced wide-ranging economic policy reforms and is moving towards a market-driven economy. This has resulted in consistent high economic growth over the last one-and-a-half decades.
India and China together are considered to be the driving force of the Asian economy.
a)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
b)
if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
c)
if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
d)
if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
e)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
|
|
Dia Mehta answered |
The Asian growth stories mainly revolve around India and China.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
The oceans are a storehouse of practically every mineral, including uranium. But, like most other minerals, it is found in extremely low concentrations - about three grams for 1000 tonnes of water.
Conclusions:
I. Sea water contains gold.
II. The oceans harbour radiation hazards.- a)if conclusion I follows;
- b)if conclusion II follows;
- c)if both I and II follow;
- d)if either I or II follows; and
- e)if neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
The oceans are a storehouse of practically every mineral, including uranium. But, like most other minerals, it is found in extremely low concentrations - about three grams for 1000 tonnes of water.
Conclusions:
I. Sea water contains gold.
II. The oceans harbour radiation hazards.
Statement:
The oceans are a storehouse of practically every mineral, including uranium. But, like most other minerals, it is found in extremely low concentrations - about three grams for 1000 tonnes of water.
Conclusions:
I. Sea water contains gold.
II. The oceans harbour radiation hazards.
a)
if conclusion I follows;
b)
if conclusion II follows;
c)
if both I and II follow;
d)
if either I or II follows; and
e)
if neither I nor II follows.
|
|
Dia Mehta answered |
Neither of the conclusions can be said to definitely follow. ‘Practically every mineral’ does not mean ‘every mineral’ and hence gold may or may not be there. Similarly, a uranium content of 3 grams per 1000 tonnes of water may or may not harbour radiation hazard.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
These apples are too expensive to be bad.
Conclusions:
I. When apples are in short supply, the prices go up.
II. The higher the selling price, the superior is the quality of the commodity.- a)if conclusion I follows;
- b)if conclusion II follows;
- c)if both I and II follow;
- d)if either I or II follows; and
- e)if neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
These apples are too expensive to be bad.
Conclusions:
I. When apples are in short supply, the prices go up.
II. The higher the selling price, the superior is the quality of the commodity.
Statement:
These apples are too expensive to be bad.
Conclusions:
I. When apples are in short supply, the prices go up.
II. The higher the selling price, the superior is the quality of the commodity.
a)
if conclusion I follows;
b)
if conclusion II follows;
c)
if both I and II follow;
d)
if either I or II follows; and
e)
if neither I nor II follows.
|
|
Aryan Khanna answered |
The first conclusion is irrelevant. The second is the meaning of the given statement. ‘Too expensive to be bad’ means that it can’t be bad because it is expensive.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
The increase in adult literacy will lead to the country’s development and progress.
Conclusions:
I. Educated persons offer less resistance to new innovations.
II. This country’s population is totally illiterate.- a)if conclusion I follows;
- b)if conclusion II follows;
- c)if both I and II follow;
- d)if either I or II follows; and
- e)if neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
The increase in adult literacy will lead to the country’s development and progress.
Conclusions:
I. Educated persons offer less resistance to new innovations.
II. This country’s population is totally illiterate.
Statement:
The increase in adult literacy will lead to the country’s development and progress.
Conclusions:
I. Educated persons offer less resistance to new innovations.
II. This country’s population is totally illiterate.
a)
if conclusion I follows;
b)
if conclusion II follows;
c)
if both I and II follow;
d)
if either I or II follows; and
e)
if neither I nor II follows.
|
|
Avantika sharma answered |
Conclusion 1: experiencing economic growth.
Conclusion 2: experiencing a decrease in crime rates.
Explanation: The given statement does not mention anything about economic growth or crime rates. Therefore, neither conclusion can be logically inferred from the statement.
Conclusion 2: experiencing a decrease in crime rates.
Explanation: The given statement does not mention anything about economic growth or crime rates. Therefore, neither conclusion can be logically inferred from the statement.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months.
Conclusions:
I. Fashion designers do not understand people’s mind very well.
II. People, by and large, are highly susceptible to novelty.- a)if conclusion I follows;
- b)if conclusion II follows;
- c)if both I and II follow;
- d)if either I or II follows; and
- e)if neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement or two are followed by two conclusions.
Statement:
Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months.
Conclusions:
I. Fashion designers do not understand people’s mind very well.
II. People, by and large, are highly susceptible to novelty.
Statement:
Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months.
Conclusions:
I. Fashion designers do not understand people’s mind very well.
II. People, by and large, are highly susceptible to novelty.
a)
if conclusion I follows;
b)
if conclusion II follows;
c)
if both I and II follow;
d)
if either I or II follows; and
e)
if neither I nor II follows.
|
|
Anika nair answered |
Analysis of the Statement and Conclusions
The statement presents a critical view of fashion, suggesting it is a form of ugliness that necessitates constant change. In evaluating the conclusions, we need to determine if they logically follow from the statement.
Conclusion I: Fashion designers do not understand people’s mind very well.
- The statement does not provide evidence that designers lack understanding of people's preferences or psychology.
- It merely critiques the transient nature of fashion without attributing this to a misunderstanding by designers.
Conclusion II: People, by and large, are highly susceptible to novelty.
- Although the statement implies that fashion changes frequently, it does not inherently suggest that people are susceptible to novelty.
- The need for change could stem from various factors, including societal pressures or commercial interests, rather than individual susceptibility.
Final Evaluation
- Both conclusions lack direct support from the statement and seem to make assumptions not warranted by the text.
- Therefore, neither conclusion logically follows from the original statement.
Correct Answer: E (Neither I nor II follows)
This answer underscores that the conclusions do not logically stem from the statement provided, highlighting the importance of critical thinking in analyzing arguments.
The statement presents a critical view of fashion, suggesting it is a form of ugliness that necessitates constant change. In evaluating the conclusions, we need to determine if they logically follow from the statement.
Conclusion I: Fashion designers do not understand people’s mind very well.
- The statement does not provide evidence that designers lack understanding of people's preferences or psychology.
- It merely critiques the transient nature of fashion without attributing this to a misunderstanding by designers.
Conclusion II: People, by and large, are highly susceptible to novelty.
- Although the statement implies that fashion changes frequently, it does not inherently suggest that people are susceptible to novelty.
- The need for change could stem from various factors, including societal pressures or commercial interests, rather than individual susceptibility.
Final Evaluation
- Both conclusions lack direct support from the statement and seem to make assumptions not warranted by the text.
- Therefore, neither conclusion logically follows from the original statement.
Correct Answer: E (Neither I nor II follows)
This answer underscores that the conclusions do not logically stem from the statement provided, highlighting the importance of critical thinking in analyzing arguments.
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.Average family income is right where it was 20 years ago, even though, in most families these days, husbands and wives are working.The above statement implies all of the following EXCEPT:- a) Even though nominal family income may have increased, inflation has risen at an equal rate.
- b) More husbands and wives are working today than 20 years ago.
- c) It was more prevalent for one spouse to work 20 years ago than today.
- d) Wives earn more than husbands today.
- e) The price level was lower 20 years ago.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Average family income is right where it was 20 years ago, even though, in most families these days, husbands and wives are working.
The above statement implies all of the following EXCEPT:
a)
Even though nominal family income may have increased, inflation has risen at an equal rate.
b)
More husbands and wives are working today than 20 years ago.
c)
It was more prevalent for one spouse to work 20 years ago than today.
d)
Wives earn more than husbands today.
e)
The price level was lower 20 years ago.
|
Rohit Jain answered |
Alternative (D) cannot be implied from the statement. There is no information in the statement that implies that wives earn more than husbands. Alternative (A) may be implied because as wives contributed to the household nominal income, if prices increased at the same rate as the income, real income would stay the same. Alternatives (B) and (C) are implicit in the statement.
If the added income contribution of wives leaves average family income at the level it was 20 years ago, then the reason must be that the price level was lower 20 years ago. So, (E) is implied.
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe Product Certification Marks Scheme (PCMS) was introduced in 1956. It provides the consumer an assurance of quality conforming to national standards.It is a voluntary scheme in general wherein producers claiming conformity to standards apply for licence. The scheme is, however, compulsory for items of mass consumption which affect the safety and health of consumers. To date, over 11,750 licences are in operation covering 1438 products, out of which about 129 are under compulsory certification.The PCMS also tries to give assurance of international standards on selected items.- a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
- b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
- c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
- d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
- e) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.
Passage
The Product Certification Marks Scheme (PCMS) was introduced in 1956. It provides the consumer an assurance of quality conforming to national standards.
It is a voluntary scheme in general wherein producers claiming conformity to standards apply for licence. The scheme is, however, compulsory for items of mass consumption which affect the safety and health of consumers. To date, over 11,750 licences are in operation covering 1438 products, out of which about 129 are under compulsory certification.
The PCMS also tries to give assurance of international standards on selected items.
a)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
b)
if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
c)
if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
d)
if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
e)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
|
|
Aryan Khanna answered |
Data inadequate. There is no mention of international standards.
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The price of oil has increased by 10% in the past month.Inference:I. The demand for oil has increased in the past month.II. The supply of oil has decreased in the past month.III. The price of other commodities has also increased in the past month.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only II follows
- c)If both I and II follow
- d)If both II and III follow
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The price of oil has increased by 10% in the past month.
Statement: The price of oil has increased by 10% in the past month.
Inference:
I. The demand for oil has increased in the past month.
II. The supply of oil has decreased in the past month.
III. The price of other commodities has also increased in the past month.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only II follows
c)
If both I and II follow
d)
If both II and III follow
|
|
Ssc Cgl answered |
The statement mentions that the price of oil has increased by 10% in the past month. From this, it can be inferred that either the demand for oil has increased or the supply of oil has decreased, or both. Therefore, options I and II are both possible inferences from the statement. Option III is incorrect as there is no mention of the price of other commodities in the statement.
Emotional intelligence is characterised by- a)Proficient in problem solving
- b)Better interpersonal relationship
- c)High abstract thinking ability
- d)Good sense of humour
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Emotional intelligence is characterised by
a)
Proficient in problem solving
b)
Better interpersonal relationship
c)
High abstract thinking ability
d)
Good sense of humour
|
|
EduRev SSC CGL answered |
Emotion is a mental state associated with fear, anger, love, etc while emotional intelligence refers to the capability of an individual to recognize, control and manage one's own emotions and the emotions of others as well.
Key Points
- It also involves your perception of others when you understand how they feel, this allows you to manage relationships more effectively.
- An individual with high EQ is able to communicate better, lessen their anxiety and stress, resolve conflicts, improve relationships, empathize with others, and overcome life's challenges.
Elements of emotional intelligence:
- Empathy
- Social skills
- Self-confidence
- Self-motivation
- Conscientiousness
- Handling relationships
- Motivation and adaptability
- Self-regulation/Awareness
Hence, it could be concluded that Emotional intelligence is characterized by better interpersonal relationships.
(A) ABC Tutorials is the best coaching institute in the city as it gives the best study material.
(B) Excessive Cash on Delivery (COD) orders have led to stagnancy in the growth of eCommerce companies.
(C) Overseas investors have pumped in `5,200 crores in capital markets in the first week of the month.
(D) The dwindling of Foreign Institutional Investments (FIIs) will have a negative effect on investors’ sentiments.- a)FFFF
- b)JFJJ
- c)FJFJ
- d)JIFI
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
(A) ABC Tutorials is the best coaching institute in the city as it gives the best study material.
(B) Excessive Cash on Delivery (COD) orders have led to stagnancy in the growth of eCommerce companies.
(C) Overseas investors have pumped in `5,200 crores in capital markets in the first week of the month.
(D) The dwindling of Foreign Institutional Investments (FIIs) will have a negative effect on investors’ sentiments.
(B) Excessive Cash on Delivery (COD) orders have led to stagnancy in the growth of eCommerce companies.
(C) Overseas investors have pumped in `5,200 crores in capital markets in the first week of the month.
(D) The dwindling of Foreign Institutional Investments (FIIs) will have a negative effect on investors’ sentiments.
a)
FFFF
b)
JFJJ
c)
FJFJ
d)
JIFI
|
|
Dia Mehta answered |
J – A tutorial being the best cannot be independently verified as best is a subjective term. It may have different meanings for different people.
I – The first half is a fact, whereas the second half is an inference derived from the fact.
F – This is a verifiable fact.
I – The first half is a fact from which the second half of the statement is inferred.
I – The first half is a fact, whereas the second half is an inference derived from the fact.
F – This is a verifiable fact.
I – The first half is a fact from which the second half of the statement is inferred.
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThen come the Tehri Dam evacuees. The Forest Department recently decided to acquire about 46 hectares of land in the Patri division of Haridwar district and rehabilitate these 33 families there. Besides, as compensation for uprooting them once more, the department is willing to distribute Rs 26 lakh among them. In addition, the department also plans to acquire 63 hectares from the Raiwallah cantonment, including the army ammunition dump. The lure of the army to move is the 220 hectares of land and the fact that the tab of building a new ammunition dump will be picked up. “These proposals are being pursued by us,” says M. Ahsan, chief conservator of Rajaji National Park.Mr M Ahsan has introduced a set of forestry reforms in India.- a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
- b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
- c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
- d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
- e) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.
Passage
Then come the Tehri Dam evacuees. The Forest Department recently decided to acquire about 46 hectares of land in the Patri division of Haridwar district and rehabilitate these 33 families there. Besides, as compensation for uprooting them once more, the department is willing to distribute Rs 26 lakh among them. In addition, the department also plans to acquire 63 hectares from the Raiwallah cantonment, including the army ammunition dump. The lure of the army to move is the 220 hectares of land and the fact that the tab of building a new ammunition dump will be picked up. “These proposals are being pursued by us,” says M. Ahsan, chief conservator of Rajaji National Park.
Mr M Ahsan has introduced a set of forestry reforms in India.
a)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
b)
if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
c)
if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
d)
if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
e)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
|
|
Aryan Khanna answered |
The choices ‘data inadequate’ is applicable to all the questions except Q. 109 where probably false should be chosen. The reason is that neither supporting nor contradicting data is present in the case of these inferences [except Q. 109]. No hint is given in the passage, for example, whether Tehri Dam evacuees were compensated or not. How do we know whether the 33 families of Patri will shift easily or offer resistance? How do we know if Rs 26 lakh is adequate? How can we check if Mr Ahsan indeed introduced some forestry reforms? But we can say that the army is less likely to decline the proposal to shift its Raiwallah cantonment. It is because they are being offered 220 hectares of land (in place of existing 63) and they will not have to spend any amount on building a new ammunition dump. We cannot really assert whether the army will accept or reject this proposal. But, according to the given passage, it is a tempting offer because the author uses the word lure for it. This means that, in the eyes of the author, the offer is unlikely to be declined by the army. Hence, it is probably false that the army will not agree to shift Raiwallah cantonment.
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.Statement: The latest polls suggest that the ruling party is likely to win the upcoming election by a large margin.Inference:I. The opposition party should withdraw from the election.II. The ruling party is the most popular choice among voters.III. The election results have already been decided.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only II follows
- c)If both I and II follow
- d)If both II and III follow
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The latest polls suggest that the ruling party is likely to win the upcoming election by a large margin.
Inference:
I. The opposition party should withdraw from the election.
II. The ruling party is the most popular choice among voters.
III. The election results have already been decided.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only II follows
c)
If both I and II follow
d)
If both II and III follow
|
|
Ssc Cgl answered |
The statement mentions that the latest polls suggest that the ruling party is likely to win the upcoming election by a large margin. From this, it can be inferred that the ruling party is the most popular choice among voters. This is the only logical inference from the given statement. Option I is incorrect as it is not mentioned that the opposition party should withdraw from the election. Option III is also incorrect as it is not mentioned that the election results have already been decided.
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.Statement: The school has announced a new policy to promote gender equality.Inference:I. The school previously had a policy that discriminated against certain genders.II. The new policy will have no impact on the students.III. The school values gender equality and is taking steps to promote it.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only III follows
- c)If both I and III follow
- d)If both II and III follow
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The school has announced a new policy to promote gender equality.
Inference:
I. The school previously had a policy that discriminated against certain genders.
II. The new policy will have no impact on the students.
III. The school values gender equality and is taking steps to promote it.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only III follows
c)
If both I and III follow
d)
If both II and III follow
|
|
Ssc Cgl answered |
The statement mentions that the school has announced a new policy to promote gender equality. From this, it can be inferred that the school values gender equality and is taking steps to promote it. This is a logical inference from the given statement. Option I is incorrect as there is no mention of whether the school previously had a policy that discriminated against certain genders. Option II is also incorrect as the statement does not mention anything about the impact of the new policy on the students.
Below are given two sets in which Set I provides the give dimensions of Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Set II offers their characteristic. Match the two sets.
Choose answer from the following options.- a)(a)-(i), (b)-(ii), (c)-(iii), (d)-(v), (e)-(iv)
- b)(a)-(v), (b)-(iv), (c)-(ii), (d)-(i), (e)-(iii)
- c)(a)-(iii), (b)-(iv), (c)-(v), (d)-(ii), (e)-(i)
- d)(a)-(ii), (b)-(iii), (c)-(iv), (d)-(v), (e)-(i)
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Below are given two sets in which Set I provides the give dimensions of Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Set II offers their characteristic. Match the two sets.
Choose answer from the following options.
Choose answer from the following options.
a)
(a)-(i), (b)-(ii), (c)-(iii), (d)-(v), (e)-(iv)
b)
(a)-(v), (b)-(iv), (c)-(ii), (d)-(i), (e)-(iii)
c)
(a)-(iii), (b)-(iv), (c)-(v), (d)-(ii), (e)-(i)
d)
(a)-(ii), (b)-(iii), (c)-(iv), (d)-(v), (e)-(i)
|
|
EduRev SSC CGL answered |
The notion of emotional intelligence broadens the concept of intelligence beyond the intellectual sphere/domain and considers that intelligence includes emotions. Emotional intelligence is a set of skills that underlie accurate appraisal, expression, and regulation of emotions. It is the feeling side of intelligence. A good IQ and scholastic record are not enough to be successful in life.
The model of emotional competence was given by Goleman (1995). It focuses on behaviors that lead to performance. This model conceptualizes emotional intelligence as a large range of dispositions and competences ranging from individual traits to learned abilities. Goleman has categorized these competencies into five categories.
These categories are:
These categories are:
The creation of Karnataka was part of the _______ of the map ofIndia on linguistic:- a)Stretching, divisions
- b)Redrawing, lines
- c)reviewing, concerning
- d)convergence, scale
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The creation of Karnataka was part of the _______ of the map ofIndia on linguistic:
a)
Stretching, divisions
b)
Redrawing, lines
c)
reviewing, concerning
d)
convergence, scale
|
Nandita Singh answered |
b)Redrawing, lines
Yes, that is correct. The creation of the state of Karnataka in India was part of the redrawing of the map of India on linguistic lines. The state of Karnataka was formed in 1956 as part of the States Reorganization Act, which redrew the boundaries of states in India based on linguistic demographics. The Act aimed to reorganize the states of India along linguistic lines in order to better reflect the linguistic and cultural diversity of the country. As a result of the Act, several states were formed or reorganized, including the state of Karnataka, which was created by combining the Kannada-speaking areas of the former states of Mysore and Bombay Presidency.
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageEven after allowing for the inclusion of the unavoidable chillies, on the whole the Indian diet seems to be more protective than carcinogenic. The per capita fat intake is only 14-20 g daily, far below even the per capita consumption of 35 g daily recommended by the Indian Council of Medical Research. In practice, most of the population is essentially vegetarian, as even the so-called non-vegetarians eat meat only once or twice a week, meat being expensive.The incidence of cancer in India, with the age standardised rate of 115 per 100,000, is one of the lowest in Asia; and is only about one-third the incidence in the West. The Indian diet may be one of the factors responsible.Indian diet is the main reason behind the low incidence of cancer.- a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
- b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
- c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
- d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
- e) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.
Passage
Even after allowing for the inclusion of the unavoidable chillies, on the whole the Indian diet seems to be more protective than carcinogenic. The per capita fat intake is only 14-20 g daily, far below even the per capita consumption of 35 g daily recommended by the Indian Council of Medical Research. In practice, most of the population is essentially vegetarian, as even the so-called non-vegetarians eat meat only once or twice a week, meat being expensive.
The incidence of cancer in India, with the age standardised rate of 115 per 100,000, is one of the lowest in Asia; and is only about one-third the incidence in the West. The Indian diet may be one of the factors responsible.
Indian diet is the main reason behind the low incidence of cancer.
a)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;
b)
if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;
c)
if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;
d)
if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; and
e)
if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.
|
|
Eshaan Kapoor answered |
The last sentence of the passage says the same thing. But that sentence itself is not sure: it uses the phrase ‘may be’. Hence, the given inference is ‘probably true’ but not ‘definitely true’.
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.In the human body, platelets promote blood clotting by clumping together.Aspirin has been found to prevent clotting by making platelets less sticky.Research has now shown that heart attacks and strokes caused by blood clots could be avoided by taking one aspirin a day. Statistics show that the incidence of second heart attacks has been reduced by 21% and overall mortality rates by 15% as a result of taking aspirin.Unfortunately, the drug has several unpleasant side-effects, including nausea, gastric bleeding, and, in severe cases, shock. In children, it has been linked to Reye’s syndrome, a rare, but occasionally fatal, childhood illness.On balance, however, for men aged 40 and over, an aspirin a day may present an excellent prophylactic measure for a disease that affects 1.5 million American yearly and claims the lives of about 540,000.Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?- a) All people should take an aspirin a day to prevent heart attacks.
- b) Painkillers prevent heart attacks.
- c) Smokers can safely continue smoking, provided they take at least one aspirin a day.
- d) The majority of people suffering second subsequent cardiac arrests could have been saved by taking an aspirin a day.
- e) Aspirin can be used to reduce mortality rates in patients who have already suffered heart attacks.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions tests your ability to derive conclusions from complex situations. Read each question carefully and answer the questions that follow.
In the human body, platelets promote blood clotting by clumping together.
Aspirin has been found to prevent clotting by making platelets less sticky.
Research has now shown that heart attacks and strokes caused by blood clots could be avoided by taking one aspirin a day. Statistics show that the incidence of second heart attacks has been reduced by 21% and overall mortality rates by 15% as a result of taking aspirin.
Unfortunately, the drug has several unpleasant side-effects, including nausea, gastric bleeding, and, in severe cases, shock. In children, it has been linked to Reye’s syndrome, a rare, but occasionally fatal, childhood illness.
On balance, however, for men aged 40 and over, an aspirin a day may present an excellent prophylactic measure for a disease that affects 1.5 million American yearly and claims the lives of about 540,000.
Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?
a)
All people should take an aspirin a day to prevent heart attacks.
b)
Painkillers prevent heart attacks.
c)
Smokers can safely continue smoking, provided they take at least one aspirin a day.
d)
The majority of people suffering second subsequent cardiac arrests could have been saved by taking an aspirin a day.
e)
Aspirin can be used to reduce mortality rates in patients who have already suffered heart attacks.
|
|
Aryan Khanna answered |
According to the passage, all people cannot take aspirin without undesirable side effects and, in some cases, the danger caused by aspirin itself outweighs its benefits. The passage, by saying “On balance, however, for men aged 40 and over, an aspirin a day may present ....”, also implies that not all, but only some people (men over 40) should take an aspirin a day. Clearly, alternative (A) cannot be concluded from the passage. Answer alternative (B) is also inappropriate. No painkiller other than aspirin is mentioned in the passage, and it cannot be inferred that all painkillers reduce the “stickiness” of platelets. (C) is incorrect. Smoking is not mentioned in the passage and, since studies of the effects of smoking and aspirin have not been reported, no conclusions can be drawn. (D) is wrong because the statistics given in the passage say that 15% of second heart attack victims were saved from death by taking aspirin, and 15% does not constitute a majority. (E) is the correct choice since it simply states that mortality rates can be reduced in patients who have already suffered a heart attack (as stated in the passage), without giving any specific statistics.
(A) You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain.
(B) There’s no place like home.
(C) Hitler was a dictator. That is a given. What is not known is how Hitler’s policies have actually benefited not just Germany, but the world at large.
(D) Honesty is the best policy.- a)IIII
- b)IFJI
- c)JJJJ
- d)FIFI
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
(A) You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain.
(B) There’s no place like home.
(C) Hitler was a dictator. That is a given. What is not known is how Hitler’s policies have actually benefited not just Germany, but the world at large.
(D) Honesty is the best policy.
(B) There’s no place like home.
(C) Hitler was a dictator. That is a given. What is not known is how Hitler’s policies have actually benefited not just Germany, but the world at large.
(D) Honesty is the best policy.
a)
IIII
b)
IFJI
c)
JJJJ
d)
FIFI
|
|
Aryan Khanna answered |
J – This is an individual opinion, and thus, a judgment.
J – This is an individual opinion, and thus, a judgment.
J – This might appear like an Inference. However, it should be seen that the second half does not automatically follow from the first half (Hitler was a dictator). The author has presumed that we know that Hitler was a dictator. However, what he has said in the second half is his individual opinion.
J – This is an individual opinion, and thus, a judgment.
J – This is an individual opinion, and thus, a judgment.
J – This might appear like an Inference. However, it should be seen that the second half does not automatically follow from the first half (Hitler was a dictator). The author has presumed that we know that Hitler was a dictator. However, what he has said in the second half is his individual opinion.
J – This is an individual opinion, and thus, a judgment.
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The government has introduced a new tax on luxury goods.Inference:I. The government is trying to raise revenue.II. The government wants to discourage the purchase of luxury goods.III. The government wants to promote the purchase of locally made goods.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only II follows
- c)If both I and II follow
- d)If both II and III follow
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The government has introduced a new tax on luxury goods.
Statement: The government has introduced a new tax on luxury goods.
Inference:
I. The government is trying to raise revenue.
II. The government wants to discourage the purchase of luxury goods.
III. The government wants to promote the purchase of locally made goods.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only II follows
c)
If both I and II follow
d)
If both II and III follow
|
|
Ssc Cgl answered |
The statement mentions that the government has introduced a new tax on luxury goods. From this, it can be inferred that the government is trying to raise revenue through taxation. This leads to the inference that option I is correct. Furthermore, the government has introduced the tax on luxury goods, which indicates that it wants to discourage their purchase. Therefore, option II is also a possible inference from the statement. Option III is incorrect as there is no mention of the government wanting to promote the purchase of locally made goods in the statement.
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The number of tourists visiting the country has decreased significantly this year.Inference:I. The tourism industry in the country is facing challenges.II. The country is not a popular tourist destination.III. The government needs to take measures to promote the country as a tourist destination.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only II follows
- c)If both I and III follow
- d)If both II and III follow
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The number of tourists visiting the country has decreased significantly this year.
Statement: The number of tourists visiting the country has decreased significantly this year.
Inference:
I. The tourism industry in the country is facing challenges.
II. The country is not a popular tourist destination.
III. The government needs to take measures to promote the country as a tourist destination.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only II follows
c)
If both I and III follow
d)
If both II and III follow
|
|
Ssc Cgl answered |
The statement mentions that the number of tourists visiting the country has decreased significantly this year. From this, it can be inferred that the tourism industry in the country is facing challenges. Therefore, option I is the only possible inference from the statement. Option II is incorrect as there is no mention of the country not being a popular tourist destination in the statement. Option III is also incorrect as there is no mention of the government needing to take measures to promote the country as a tourist destination in the statement.
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.Statement: The university has decided to offer a new course on artificial intelligence.Inference:I. The demand for courses in artificial intelligence is increasing.II. The university wants to attract more international students.III. The university has expertise in artificial intelligence.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only III follows
- c)If both I and III follow
- d)If both II and III follow
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The university has decided to offer a new course on artificial intelligence.
Inference:
I. The demand for courses in artificial intelligence is increasing.
II. The university wants to attract more international students.
III. The university has expertise in artificial intelligence.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only III follows
c)
If both I and III follow
d)
If both II and III follow
|
|
EduRev SSC CGL answered |
The statement mentions that the university has decided to offer a new course on artificial intelligence. From this, it can be inferred that the university has expertise in artificial intelligence. It can also be inferred that the demand for courses in artificial intelligence is increasing, as the university is offering a new course on this topic. Therefore, options I and III are possible inferences from the statement. Option II is incorrect as there is no mention of the university wanting to attract more international students in the statement.
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The company has decided to lay off 500 employees due to financial losses.Inference:I. The company is facing financial difficulties.II. The employees who were laid off were not performing well.III. The company will be able to recover from its financial losses after the layoffs.- a)If only I follows
- b)If only III follows
- c)If both I and II follow
- d)If both I and III follow
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the question, the statement is given followed by some inferences. You must consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which inference can be drawn from the given statement.
Statement: The company has decided to lay off 500 employees due to financial losses.
Statement: The company has decided to lay off 500 employees due to financial losses.
Inference:
I. The company is facing financial difficulties.
II. The employees who were laid off were not performing well.
III. The company will be able to recover from its financial losses after the layoffs.
a)
If only I follows
b)
If only III follows
c)
If both I and II follow
d)
If both I and III follow
|
|
EduRev SSC CGL answered |
The statement mentions that the company has decided to lay off 500 employees due to financial losses. From this, it can be inferred that the company is facing financial difficulties. This is a logical inference from the given statement. Option II is incorrect as there is no mention of the performance of the employees who were laid off. Option III is also incorrect as there is no information provided in the statement about whether the company will be able to recover from its financial losses after the layoffs.
Chapter doubts & questions for Evaluating Inferences - General Intelligence and Reasoning for SSC CGL 2025 is part of SSC CGL exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the SSC CGL exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for SSC CGL 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Evaluating Inferences - General Intelligence and Reasoning for SSC CGL in English & Hindi are available as part of SSC CGL exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SSC CGL Exam by signing up for free.
General Intelligence and Reasoning for SSC CGL
201 videos|226 docs|197 tests
|
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup on EduRev and stay on top of your study goals
10M+ students crushing their study goals daily